Skip to main content

Former Green Bay Packers president, CEO Bob Harlan carved niche in team history
Green Bay Press Gazette

by Brett Christopherson on 1:15 PM, Nov. 3, 2011
quote:


The former Packers president, CEO and chairman was in town to appear as a guest on The Post-Crescent's weekly sports talk show "Clubhouse Live,"

Harlan invoked laughter throughout his hour on stage, spinning tales of the impromptu interview he had with Ron Wolf at a Denny's restaurant near Lambeau Field — four years before he would hire Wolf as the Packers' general manager — and the team trying to woo prized free agent Reggie White over dinner at a local Red Lobster.

"You could tell what kind of a budget we were on in those days," Harlan quipped.

He expressed his displeasure over the Brett Favre saga, saying he's "not happy with what Brett's done the last three years. It hasn't pleased me."

He considers the 1996 NFL title, Green Bay's first in 29 years, and the $295 million Lambeau Field renovation project he spearheaded as the accomplishments he holds most tightly.

"Our treasurer told me last year that if we did not have Lambeau Field (renovated) today, we would be either 31st or 32nd in the league (in revenue) with no future," Harlan said. "That $295 million project, if we wanted to do it today, because of the great increase in cost in both concrete and steel, that project would cost us $800 million."

It was Harlan who altered the organizational structure when he promised full football authority to Wolf. It was Harlan who understood a renovated stadium — one that could be used year-round — would provide a significant and critical revenue boost. It was Harlan who identified Thompson's ability to scout and draft. It was Harlan who put into motion the careful restoration of a franchise that's among the most envied in sports. continue
Nice article and worth the click. It's good to see just how much Bob Harlan is appreciated in GB, he deserves it. Here's the link to the Video

Here's the link to purchase his book from the pro shop:
Green and Gold Moments
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
"I always looked at the president of the Packers as a caretaker," Harlan said. "We do not own the team. Our responsibility is to go in there, take care of it and hopefully leave it in better shape than you found it.


I wish all our political leaders -- not to mention political parties -- had this inmind at all times. Oh, well...
quote:
Originally posted by Schaap:
The most important person in Packer history since Vince.


No question about this whatsoever. And a genuine, humane man to boot.

He should have his name emblazoned inside Lambeau inside Lambeau alongside Vince, Bart, and Nitschke.
and he carved it affordably. saw most of a 30 minute interview with Harlan on a local GB Sunday morning TV show. the renovation cost $295mil when they did it (doesn't that seem cheap as can be now?) and said if they were to do it right now it would cost over $800mil. Thanks again, Bob!
Harlan may have to lead the charge for the Packers to develop an even larger international audience:


"There's going to be a limit to how much growth you can create in the U.S. without new revenue channels," said Bill Glenn, senior vice president of The Marketing Arm, a Dallas-based sports marketing firm. "Unless we're talking pay-per-view for NFL games, I'm not sure where that comes from in the U.S. Jersey sponsorships? That doesn't create the kind of revenue the league is looking for.

"It's a very very challenging proposition for the NFL to have significant growth rates and keep within the domestic boundaries."
quote:
Originally posted by cuqui:

He should have his name emblazoned inside Lambeau inside Lambeau alongside Vince, Bart, and Nitschke.


Agreed. This team and organization was a mess when he took over. I wonder if they would even be around today if it wasn't for him?
quote:
"That doesn't create the kind of revenue the league is looking for. It's a very very challenging proposition for the NFL to have significant growth rates and keep within the domestic boundaries."


can I ask a simple stupid question here? why do they need significant growth rates? why must the balloon constantly enlarge?
only answer I got is: greed
quote:
Originally posted by Tdog:

Why do they need significant growth rates? why must the balloon constantly enlarge?


Its a very good question and it would be interesting to ask that of the NFL and/ or the teams (or any of the Econ majors on this board). Maybe its to pay for the player costs, maybe its to fund or pay for the new stadiums/ team debt or maybe its just greed.
quote:
Originally posted by Hungry5:
quote:
I wonder if they would even be around today if it wasn't for him?

They would be... but with a perennial door-mat/POS team that sells out every game.


Not sure without the stadium renovations that he spearheaded. Remember the tax payers didn't want to fund it (or some of it) and Harlan got it done.
quote:
Originally posted by Hungry5:
quote:
I wonder if they would even be around today if it wasn't for him?

They would be... but with a perennial door-mat/POS team that sells out every game.


Just what we need, another version of the Cubs.
The idea of contracting the Packers would have probably crossed the mind of the NFL big-boys if the last 20 years had been a continuation of the Gregg/Infante horror show. It probably would have started with the NFL coming to the team with some friendly advice on what they should do to build a more functional organization, and then concluding the visit with a veiled threat about contraction if things didn't change. We have to remember that even when the Packers began winning again in the 90s, there still was an owner who said he wanted to get rid of the Packers at a league meeting (because of the unique ownership structure). There certainly was a chance that something really bad would have happened if those 20 years of losing turned into 40+ years of losing, either contraction or a forced move to Milwaukee. What Harlan has done for the Packers is right on the same level with the contributions of Lambeau and Lombardi.
I doubt there was any way the Packers would've ever been 'contracted'. The league seems to want to avoid that at all costs, and there were as many teams that were in the same--or worse--condition.
I can't recall the Packers being in financial trouble during the "Gory Years"; I seem to remember they were on the bottom end of revenue-sharing for awhile, but were never in danger of folding.
quote:
there still was an owner who said he wanted to get rid of the Packers at a league meeting (because of the unique ownership structure).


You'll have to refresh my memory as to exactly which owner it was? I don't recall this at all.
quote:
Originally posted by Tdog:
quote:
"That doesn't create the kind of revenue the league is looking for. It's a very very challenging proposition for the NFL to have significant growth rates and keep within the domestic boundaries."


can I ask a simple stupid question here? why do they need significant growth rates? why must the balloon constantly enlarge?
only answer I got is: greed


I thought the exact same thing as you when I saw those quotes. No need for growth in my mind, but obviously others feel differently.
Actually, Jerry Jones really likes the Packers. The Packers pull their weight and are consistently in the top 10 in revenue.

It was teams like the Vikings he has a big problem with. Consistently in the bottom of the league in revenue. Which of course means his team the Cowboys is giving the Vikings (& other teams in the bottom of the league) money. That's what drives the greedy Jones crazy.
quote:
Originally posted by Boris:
quote:
there still was an owner who said he wanted to get rid of the Packers at a league meeting (because of the unique ownership structure).


You'll have to refresh my memory as to exactly which owner it was? I don't recall this at all.
It was just reported as "an owner" in all of the articles I've read. I'm looking for an article that references the quote, I'll see if I can find it. It's been discussed on this forum in the past, most people thought it was either Al Davis or Jerry Jones when speculating on who it was.
quote:
Originally posted by Timmy!:
I doubt there was any way the Packers would've ever been 'contracted'. The league seems to want to avoid that at all costs, and there were as many teams that were in the same--or worse--condition.
I can't recall the Packers being in financial trouble during the "Gory Years"; I seem to remember they were on the bottom end of revenue-sharing for awhile, but were never in danger of folding.
There were other bad teams back then, but few teams have ever experienced the level of abject suck the Packers had from 1973-1991. Not only were they bad on the field, but they were basically non-existent in the consciousness of the public (not saying the Packers didn't maintain a good following, but they were an afterthought on TV, magazines, NFL Films and in the minds of most football fans). If that rotten streak never turned around (running right up until the present day), there would definitely be some buzz about contracting the team or moving to Milwaukee. The other big factor in all of this is that a lot of the NFL owners hate seeing a community owned team in their billionaires club, that would have thrown a great deal of fuel onto the fire.
I highly doubt they would have been contracted but that stadium before the renovations would not have been the revenue source it now is. Harlan took the organization from the bottom to the top. If those stadium changes wouldn't have happened, I'm sure the moving threat would have come up.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×