Eliot Harrison prediction
Packers arriving
Inactive GBP -
23 CB
34 RB
52 LB
68 T
73 C/G
89 TE
99 DT
Inactive TEN - WR McBride, RB Fluellen, DB Riley, OLB Wallace, G Tretola, TE Amaro, DL Woods
Eliot Harrison prediction
Packers arriving
Inactive GBP -
23 CB
34 RB
52 LB
68 T
73 C/G
89 TE
99 DT
Inactive TEN - WR McBride, RB Fluellen, DB Riley, OLB Wallace, G Tretola, TE Amaro, DL Woods
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Pfft, I've seen better.
Titans have a good running game. Packers play run defense like they did against the Cowboys and it'll be a very long day.
Name calling and bullying, is that all you got?
The Packersβ defense embraces its No. 1 run ranking, but they have to be aware that six of their eight games have come against run offenses that rank 22nd or worse. It includes the New York Giants (32), Minnesota (31), Detroit (27) and Jacksonville (26).
In those six games, the Packers have held the opposition to 2.46 yards per carry and three touchdowns.
The Titans are similarly successful against weak competition.
Seven of the nine run defenses theyβve faced are ranked 17th or worse. They include Cleveland (31), Miami (30), Houston (28), Jacksonville (24) and Indianapolis (22).
In those seven games, they have rushed for 4.62 yards per carry and nine touchdowns.
Against the No. 8-ranked Vikings, however, they ran 22 times for 64 yards, a 2.9 average. Against the No. 5-ranked San Diego Chargers, they rushed 19 times for 80 yards, a 4.2 average.
Hungry5 posted:Name calling and bullying, is that all you got?
um, this is the internet
um, name calling and bullying are winning traits these days.
Oh. I forgot: Go Packers!
NFL Live showed all of the mistakes by Rodgers in the Colts game. Open receivers and missed opportunities, amazing how bad it has gotten for the ex-mvp. Obviously not all on him but the guy goes into a shell against man coverage. Kryptonite
I like the Packers in a 2nd half walk.
Rob Demovsky ESPN Staff Writer
Sounds like the Packers' offensive plan of switching personnel groups is here to stay. Coach Mike McCarthy said he's worked with 21 different personnel groups in his game plan this week. "The structure that we're in now is here to stay," McCarthy said Thursday. "But no-huddle is a very important component because we're very good at it when it's used the right amount of time."
Usually, the better team wins.....no matter how many different personnel groups they employ. Block better, tackle better, play better and usually you will win.
Starks active, Jackson inactive. Interesting.
Yes interesting. Either Jackson sucks or they figure Monty is considered better.
Edit: Fox announcer could not even remember the name of our "running back" who is back from injury.
Former. Considering ST and the multiple personnel groups McCarthy wants to employ.
Bird?
Hungry5 posted:Former. Considering ST and the multiple personnel groups McCarthy wants to employ.
Bird?
OMGOSH....it does kinda look like he's giving it don't it. And I for one don't blame him.....but shoot, he's got to do so much better. Come on Aaron......kick some arse will ya. Pleeeeeeaeeeeeeeeease!!!!!!!
Lots of Packers fans in attendance.
This could be a start of something good for the rest of the injury plagued season. ...or not. But I have high hopes none the less.
Bad decision by McCarthy already!
BOSTICK!!!!
unexpected, this is
Could have used Joe in Seattle.
No Bostick there.
Terrible throw.
lol
Rodgerd
Total waste of field position. Bad pass by AR.
And they piss it away anyway.
Let's establish the run. it's more important than winning
How many personnel groups did we use on that drive.....
Goodson... nice try but why feel compelled to hold the ball while you slid into the end zone?
οΏ½οΏ½
Is anyone other than Joe Thomas ready to play today?
At least 70% of posters on this site would have made that throw. This guy is an average QB at this stage.
LOLOLOLOL.
OMG!
So much for the vaunted run defense
Julius Peppers