Salute to murdered police officers
This is how you show and get respect.
Thanks Ha Ha.
This probably wont make it to the main stream media because its not their agenda, which is too bad.
Salute to murdered police officers
This is how you show and get respect.
Thanks Ha Ha.
This probably wont make it to the main stream media because its not their agenda, which is too bad.
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Ha Ha is getting (or has gotten) a criminal justice degree. He also seems like a good guy (as best one can tell from twitter and charity work).
But it is a good point though, if every good thing doesn't make the front page, it clearly is a bias. We cannot let Ha Ha's attention to fallen officers be his personal opportunity to thank those who serve, it must be political as well.
And stop messing with statues
I really want to add something. But nothing's missing. It's such a rational response to a point trying to be made about something that isn't asking for a point to be made.
Show and "get" respect. Them other uppity niggers need to know their place. For today HaHa is one of them good niggers.
Do you think holidays and erecting statues in the 1920's as an open affront to civil rights supporting Jim Crow is also how you "get" respect?
Funny thing is there is no correlation between HaHa honoring police in the area he grew up in and protests against overall policing issues where a disproportionate amount of black people die.
Henry posted:Show and "get" respect. Them other uppity niggers need to know their place. For today HaHa is one of them good niggers.
Do you think holidays and erecting statues in the 1920's as an open affront to civil rights supporting Jim Crow is also how you "get" respect?
Funny thing is there is no correlation between HaHa honoring police in the area he grew up in and protests against overall policing issues where a disproportionate amount of black people die.
Because, of course it's impossible that black people are committing a disproportionate amount of crime, right?
But I didn't bring race into this, you did chief. Looks like you're a bit hypersensitive to the situation.
No of course you didn't bring race into this. Not at all. Nope. Wasn't the intent at all to start a new thread when you don't regularly post except to piss your pants about Murica.
And why do you think that is with all them crime committing individuals? Do you think there's a common thread? Please do share.
And what crime did Philando Castille commit when he was gunned down? I've done worse when I was younger and ended up laughing with the cops afterwards instead of getting gunned down.
Why is it in years past when the Left used non-violent means of protest they were pussies? Yet now when people have had enough of this **** you candy asses cry like a bunch of bitches. Were are all those tough guys now? Maybe you can answer that for me.
Clinton-Dix paying respect to slain officers won't make it to mainstream media because it's not their agenda.
Its likely this mention by Clinton-Dix won't make it to main stream media either. Which is good for you. It doesn't fit your agenda. And lord knows you love agendas.
The fact is Clinton-Dix is trying to be a difference maker. Raise awareness. Without pushing an agenda.
Im pretty sure he'd appreciate it if you stopped cherry picking his work trying to peddle your bull****.
Dude, slowly reach back, grab yer panties and un-wedge them from your crack.
I posted a positive act committed towards the police. I get that it's against your agenda, but thats too bad. You want to take statistics and twist them until they fit your agenda.
You do need some hypersensitivity training...
Is PFT, owned by NBC mainstream enough? Of course not.
HaHa's tribute is thoughtful and moving. More implied false equivalency takes away from his tribute.
That intentional ignorance, no intentional hate, is going to get destroyed.
Gdog posted:Dude, slowly reach back, grab yer panties and un-wedge them from your crack.
I posted a positive act committed towards the police. I get that it's against your agenda, but thats too bad. You want to take statistics and twist them until they fit your agenda.
You do need some hypersensitivity training...
You're getting called out because your intent is ****ing bull****. Go sell that **** in your weekly circle jerk of oppressed white guys.
Yes, how you "get" respect.
Oh, and if you're talking about twisting statistics now then answer my god damn questions.
I'm going to beat you like a rented mule.
ChilliJon posted:Clinton-Dix paying respect to slain officers won't make it to mainstream media because it's not their agenda.
Its likely this mention by Clinton-Dix won't make it to main stream media either. Which is good for you. It doesn't fit your agenda. And lord knows you love agendas.
The fact is Clinton-Dix is trying to be a difference maker. Raise awareness. Without pushing an agenda.
Im pretty sure he'd appreciate it if you stopped cherry picking his work trying to peddle your bull****.
Have you noticed how anyone that doesn't agree with the lefts agenda now is a racist?
Have you noticed you don't actually answer questions and respond without buzz phrases fed to you by the Bannon Tribune and Fox and Friends?
Henry posted:Have you noticed you don't actually answer questions and respond without buzz phrases fed to you by the Bannon Tribune and Fox and Friends?
You're a racist.
Gdog posted:Because, of course it's impossible that black people are committing a disproportionate amount of crime, right?
Nothing racist about this reply. Don't let these beta cuck snowflakes attack you, continue to fight back with facts like this.
Grave Digger posted:Gdog posted:Because, of course it's impossible that black people are committing a disproportionate amount of crime, right?
Nothing racist about this reply. Don't let these beta cuck snowflakes attack you, continue to fight back with facts like this.
So, statistics are racist?
Real ones aren't. Don't get bogged down in facts brother, keep fighting the good fight against the lamestream media.
Gdog posted:Henry posted:Have you noticed you don't actually answer questions and respond without buzz phrases fed to you by the Bannon Tribune and Fox and Friends?
You're a racist.
Are all of you Trump toadies this ****ing bad at context and humor?
I don't use "ist/ism" like those hothouse flowers in exlusive universities waiting for their balls to drop. I judge by individual merit. Right now you're pegging the simpleton coward range pretty hard.
You still haven't answered my questions.
Henry posted:Gdog posted:Henry posted:Have you noticed you don't actually answer questions and respond without buzz phrases fed to you by the Bannon Tribune and Fox and Friends?
You're a racist.
Are all of you Trump toadies this ****ing bad at context and humor?
I don't use "ist/ism" like those hothouse flowers in exlusive universities waiting for their balls to drop. I judge by individual merit. Right now you're pegging the simpleton coward range pretty hard.
Because I don't agree with you. I get it.
You and your lefty buds are all the same at this point. It's all about race.
No ****head. It's about class for the working man.
You still haven't answered my questions.
I bet you have one of them commie BA degrees and live in the suburbs.
BTW, you still haven't answered my questions.
Well this should ease your pain
1) Nice ****ing sources
2) Where's the context? Per capita? Suicide by cop vs. actual crime? You know, details you coward.
But as data scientists and policing experts often note, comparing how many or how often white people are killed by police to how many or how often black people are killed by the police is statistically dubious unless you first adjust for population.
According to the most recent census data, there are nearly 160 million more white people in America than there are black people. White people make up roughly 62 percent of the U.S. population but only about 49 percent of those who are killed by police officers. African Americans, however, account for 24 percent of those fatally shot and killed by the police despite being just 13 percent of the U.S. population. As The Post noted in a new analysis published last week, that means black Americans are 2.5 times as likely as white Americans to be shot and killed by police officers.
Should we pivot back to all them black criminals again?
BTW, you still haven't answered my questions.
Daryl Gates Fatheads are great for providing talking points. Not so much for providing answers to questions.
Henry posted:1) Nice ****ing sources
2) Where's the context? Per capita? Suicide by cop vs. actual crime? You know, details you coward.
But as data scientists and policing experts often note, comparing how many or how often white people are killed by police to how many or how often black people are killed by the police is statistically dubious unless you first adjust for population.
According to the most recent census data, there are nearly 160 million more white people in America than there are black people. White people make up roughly 62 percent of the U.S. population but only about 49 percent of those who are killed by police officers. African Americans, however, account for 24 percent of those fatally shot and killed by the police despite being just 13 percent of the U.S. population. As The Post noted in a new analysis published last week, that means black Americans are 2.5 times as likely as white Americans to be shot and killed by police officers.
Should we pivot back to all them black criminals again?
OK, so I'll let you choose the source. While you're carefully choosing your source, provide the stats showing per capita (because you like that) violent crime by race.
I'll be right here.
What part of data scientist and policing experts didn't you understand? Was that breakdown a little too hard to understand since it blew your out of context pie chart out of the water? It's basic math. Didn't your BA come with math skills?
Like I said, you still haven't answered my questions cupcake.
Too bad you have run off many of the other pusscakes around here Hank. I love watching these beatdowns.
Another nail.
Lots of interesting stats in that FBI report, eh?
Unfortunate stats for your agenda.
I guess math wasn't part of your BA package. I mean we aren't talking about a train leaves the station moving at 10 MPH . . .
Did you notice the FBI report was for arrests? Of course not. What would be interesting is to see who went to jail and who didn't. Want to do some more math?
Are you using your per capita math here?? Because if you are, we are looking at 2 different FBI reports
Didn't I just say that? Do you need me to give you Clif Notes on the last 3 posts?
You must've gotten the BA sans critical thinking as well.
You still haven't answered my questions.
Let's break it down:
1) You posted an out of context pie chart on police killings by race.
2) GD posted a 2014 report on total arrests. Are you seeing the difference here?
3) You stated the FBI report didn't support my agenda even though that isn't the issue you were bellyaching about.
4) To up the ante, I pulled a reputable report on 2014 incarceration by race, which shows blacks are imprisoned 6 TIMES more than whites.
Do you need me to slow it down for you? Maybe put on some Fox and Friends hand puppets?
You still haven't answered my questions.
You still haven't answered my questions.