Skip to main content

quote:
Hayward expects to start outside in 2013
foxsportswisconsin.com


"I want to start outside," Hayward told FOXSportsWisconsin.com. "I feel like I can be an outside guy now full-time."

When cornerbacks coach Joe Whitt concluded his season-ending exit interview with Hayward in January, the message was sent loud and clear that both starting spots will be up for grabs when players report back for training camp this summer.

"It'll be an open competition, and I'll be ready for it," said Hayward, a 2012 second-round pick. "I'll prove that I can play outside now and not just the slot."

"It's going to be an interesting competition to see who will be starting on the outside. If I don't start on the outside, I'm going to lock up my inside responsibilities, but I do want to start outside."
continue
Lots more past the click.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I was closer to the mindset of not messing with a good thing, especially with how much nickel the team plays and the need to have a shutdown slot corner. (Similar to the dilemma of whether or not to try upgrading your LT at the risk of losing an All-Pro RT.)

But as AP gladly showed the world, your corners will have to tackle in base. Hayward can still slide inside in Nickel as the article mentions, so I've come around to him playing outside in base if he's one of the best two CBs. I'm sure my gradual change of heart will help Capers sleep better.
I hope the hammy is healed, but I still see Hayward as a slot guy who can do some of the things that Woodson did around the LOS. Williams, Shields, House can battle for the outside spots



"However, as the Packers approached the playoffs, Hayward's playing time was down again. In the final five games (postseason included), Hayward was on the field for only 50.4 percent of the defensive snaps.

One reason for that, Hayward explained, was a left hamstring injury that had been bothering him -- and is still lingering nearly three months after the season ended.

"My leg was hurting toward the end of the year," Hayward said. "It wasn't too bad, but it's the type of hamstring thing that has to rest. I haven't been working out super, super hard because I'm trying to rest my legs. I'm not doing too much running right now, but I'm doing enough."
quote:
Originally posted by Satori:
I think GB was in nickle way more than base


66.8%

quote:
Rewind'12: Circling back on nickel usage
espn.go.com


As it turns out, the percentages of extra defensive backs were nearly identical in 2012. Once again, the Green Bay Packers led the NFL in nickel/dime use, and thus used their "base" 3-4 defense less than any other team.

On the other hand, you wonder if that heavy usage played a role in the Packers' vulnerability against power running teams, most notably the Minnesota Vikings and San Francisco 49ers. The Detroit Lions, on the other hand, can be fully excused from using extra defensive backs less than all but seven NFL teams. Their secondary depth was poor over the past two years, due in part to injuries. continue
How much of that had to do with losing so many LBs I don't know but they need to get better out of the base.
He was good in 2012, but let's not get carried away. Follow up tweet by PFF today:

Pro Football Focus‏@PFF9h
It's worth pointing out that @show_case29 had some truly ridiculous coverage numbers in 2012. From Wk10 onwards allowed 115 yards. TOTAL

See, after week 10 he gave up 115 yards in 6 weeks. That's 19 yards the guy is just giving away every game. So let's try and hold it together, ok?

I actually had to read the tweet twice, thought it was a typo.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×