Seeing reports in various sites that the trade will be for a mid-round selection in the 2019 draft from the Seahawks. Good trade.(I think)
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Sixth rounder?
The fact that Gutenkunst got a mid to late round pick for that scrub impresses the hell out of me.
Holy crap!!!!!!
Another pick to add to the trade for Mack.......
I think Hundley fits better there than in GB. All in all, itâs a good trade. Itâs not what was hoped for but itâs enough.
time for Kizer to step up
I'll believe they got anything more than a conditional 7th rounder when it's official. The guess is this trade has some contingencies in terms of whether Hundley makes the roster, is active for certain number of games, or has any playing time.
Rapoport is reporting it's a 6th rounder. Good for Gute.
The price of gum just went up in Seattle.
RochNyFan posted:The fact that Gutenkunst got a mid to late round pick for that scrub impresses the hell out of me.
No ****. Gargleflargin' just went up a notch in my book. Now get some tackle depth.
skully posted:time for Kizer to step up
I wonder if this means Boyle will make the 53? Still not counting on it.
When asked by reporters what he saw in quarterback Brett Hundley that would warrant any type of compensation to the Packers, Pete Carroll replied:
"Have you seen how that kid chews gum?"
Henry posted:skully posted:time for Kizer to step up
I wonder if this means Boyle will make the 53? Still not counting on it.
He will. Reports say he's made the 53.
skully posted:time for Kizer to step up
Time to play Boyle. Cut that useless Keizer.
https://twitter.com/robdemovsk...809118899486720?s=12
Boyle, bitches!
Thunderbird posted:When asked by reporters what he saw in quarterback Brett Hundley that would warrant any type of compensation to the Packers, Pete Carroll replied:
"Have you seen how that kid chews gum?"
Now this is just outright hysterical.......
Keep reading the media narrative about Hundley's improvement from last year that I frankly didn't see. Ecstatic the team has decided to move on.
Yes! My gosh, Gooterkiss is a miracle worker if this is finalized! ð
michiganjoe posted:Keep reading the media narrative about Hundley's improvement from last year that I frankly didn't see. Ecstatic the team has decided to move on.
Hundley fits the following mold: Dan Orlovsky, Scott Tolzien, Matt Barkley, Connor Cook, etc. He's a guy that looks good in warmups, doesn't cause any problems in the locker room, is no threat to the starter, and will stick around for a half dozen or so years and look good carrying a clipboard. If they come into a game and the defense has been schemed to stop the starter, they may look OK for a few series because the defenses have been schemed to stop the types of plays that Aaron Rodgers, Andrew Luck, etc. are capable of. As soon as they have to start a game where the defense can be designed to maximize their limitations (for example, Hundley not being able to hit a moving target or complete a pass more than 10 yards downfield), they are toast.
Sixth round pick confirmed.
Goodbye.
Good riddance.
TT got him in the 5th round. PACKERS get a 6th rounder for him. Still think this was a good trade for the PACKERS !!!!
MichiganPacker posted:michiganjoe posted:Keep reading the media narrative about Hundley's improvement from last year that I frankly didn't see. Ecstatic the team has decided to move on.
Hundley fits the following mold: Dan Orlovsky, Scott Tolzien, Matt Barkley, Connor Cook, etc. He's a guy that looks good in warmups, doesn't cause any problems in the locker room, is no threat to the starter, and will stick around for a half dozen or so years and look good carrying a clipboard. If they come into a game and the defense has been schemed to stop the starter, they may look OK for a few series because the defenses have been schemed to stop the types of plays that Aaron Rodgers, Andrew Luck, etc. are capable of. As soon as they have to start a game where the defense can be designed to maximize their limitations (for example, Hundley not being able to hit a moving target or complete a pass more than 10 yards downfield), they are toast.
You just insulted Dan Orlovsky, Scott Tolzien, Matt Barkley and Connor Cook....and perhaps even TJ Rubley. lol! I was at the Eagles game in 2013, the first game after Shea McClellan broke Rodgers' collarbone. Seneca Wallace played one series before leaving with a groin injury and Tolzien played the rest of the game, fresh off the practice squad. He did more in that game to impress me than Hundley did all of last year. Except when in came to chewing gum, of course. Hundley is the GOAT for that.
Herschel posted:Good riddance.
It's spelled "Riddens" let's get the history straight.
Whew! Finally!
He cost us a 5th, and netted us a 6th.
That's great maff.
He may be crazy but he ain't dumb, Craaaazy Guter comin' atcha.
Goldie posted:Thunderbird posted:When asked by reporters what he saw in quarterback Brett Hundley that would warrant any type of compensation to the Packers, Pete Carroll replied:
"Have you seen how that kid chews gum?"
Now this is just outright hysterical.......
Gutey is the master!
my sources tell me one detail was left out of early reports. We not only sent Hundley, but also had to pony up a case of Pabst blue ribbon.
RochNyFan posted:MichiganPacker posted:michiganjoe posted:Keep reading the media narrative about Hundley's improvement from last year that I frankly didn't see. Ecstatic the team has decided to move on.
Hundley fits the following mold: Dan Orlovsky, Scott Tolzien, Matt Barkley, Connor Cook, etc. He's a guy that looks good in warmups, doesn't cause any problems in the locker room, is no threat to the starter, and will stick around for a half dozen or so years and look good carrying a clipboard. If they come into a game and the defense has been schemed to stop the starter, they may look OK for a few series because the defenses have been schemed to stop the types of plays that Aaron Rodgers, Andrew Luck, etc. are capable of. As soon as they have to start a game where the defense can be designed to maximize their limitations (for example, Hundley not being able to hit a moving target or complete a pass more than 10 yards downfield), they are toast.
You just insulted Dan Orlovsky, Scott Tolzien, Matt Barkley and Connor Cook....and perhaps even TJ Rubley. lol! I was at the Eagles game in 2013, the first game after Shea McClellan broke Rodgers' collarbone. Seneca Wallace played one series before leaving with a groin injury and Tolzien played the rest of the game, fresh off the practice squad. He did more in that game to impress me than Hundley did all of last year. Except when in came to chewing gum, of course. Hundley is the GOAT for that.
All those guys sucked equal ass, Tolzien included. He was a painful watch. Itâs like comparing the suck to warts on your prick. None is better to look at than the other.
Great article on Boyle from Silverstein back in early May. Quite a sudden change in the types of QB's being acquired/brought in. Change from TT? From TT and MM? From MM?
"Since drafting Rodgers, the young quarterbacks the Packers have attempted to develop have been better in the classroom than on the football field. The club has invested time and effort into quarterbacks who are too short or too slow or too weak-armed to have much of a chance in the NFL."
I came here for the Rodgers contract review and read this. I love it.
Mcpacker64 posted:TT got him in the 5th round. PACKERS get a 6th rounder for him. Still think this was a good trade for the PACKERS !!!!
Not as good as CLE getting a starting DB for Kizer...
Tavis Smiley posteItâs like comparing the suck to warts on your prick. None is better to look at than the other.
I wish I could unread that. In any case, Viking Suck thread is a couple aisles over.
DH13 posted:Tavis Smiley posteItâs like comparing the suck to warts on your prick. None is better to look at than the other.
I wish I could unread that. In any case, Viking Suck thread is a couple aisles over.
If you are sporting genital warts, it's a good bet that they came from the Viking's Suck thread.
mr21mr21 posted:Mcpacker64 posted:TT got him in the 5th round. PACKERS get a 6th rounder for him. Still think this was a good trade for the PACKERS !!!!
Not as good as CLE getting a starting DB for Kizer...
Disagree - Packers also got higher in the draft in 2 rounds.
I also think Kizer will be decent as a backup in this league. At a minimum Kizer has gobs more talent than Hundley ever had.
