Skip to main content

PFT posted penalty stats through the first 5 weeks of the season. And the increase in illegal contact and defensive holding calls over 2013 is pretty staggering. 

 

Illegal contact calls through week 5:

2013 - 15

2014 - 59

 

Defensive holding calls through week 5:

2013 - 52

2014 - 115

 

On one hand, the NFL had to do something after Seattle dared the NFL to not do something. The new rules stress defenses more than ever before though. Start doubling and quadrupling calls that award an automatic first down and it's not even marginally unfair for the defense. 

 

If the NFL is going to continue to force this agenda, fine. But completely overhaul the "automatic first down" policy. You can't award automatic first downs for illegal contact, defensive holding, and hands to the face anymore if the most marginal instances are drawing a flag. Nothing worse than an offense facing 3rd and 10 and picking up a first down for illegal contact. Mark off 5 yards and replay the down. Mark off 10 for hands to the face and holding. If that results in a 1st down, great. 

 

If the NFL continues to hand out automatic 1st downs for those defensive penalties then offensive holding, hands to the face and offensive PI should result in a loss of down. Need to come up with a way to balance these calls out. 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by ChilliJon:

 

 

If the NFL continues to hand out automatic 1st downs for those defensive penalties then offensive holding, hands to the face and offensive PI should result in a loss of down. Need to come up with a way to balance these calls out. 

Agree, I think that I have been seeing plenty of offensive PI's NOT called. However, maybe that would result in even more flags if they were called.

Originally Posted by PackerPatrick:
Originally Posted by ChilliJon:

 

 

If the NFL continues to hand out automatic 1st downs for those defensive penalties then offensive holding, hands to the face and offensive PI should result in a loss of down. Need to come up with a way to balance these calls out. 

Agree, I think that I have been seeing plenty of offensive PI's NOT called. However, maybe that would result in even more flags if they were called.

I'd love it if those changes were made, but it will never happen. The most we might see in terms of rule changes that favor defenses is eliminating some forms of blocking that tend to cause injuries. That wouldn't be to "balance things out", but because teams sink a great deal of money into guys like JJ Watt and Terrell Suggs, and owners don't like it when big money players are on IR. It's gotten to the point that even casual fans know records like Peyton Manning throwing for 55 TDs or the Broncos scoring 600 points on offense are just meaningless fluff manufactured straight from the league office (going by the way the rules were interpreted just a decade ago, you could shave off a dozen TDs and the better part of 100 points from those totals). Even though I didn't like seeing the Seahawks win, I loved the final score of last year's Super Bowl. You just know that Goodell was fuming all game long watching the Broncos offense stink it up, in spite of all the tweaks they've made over the past ten years to make it easier for quarterbacks. It's worth noting that the first batch of increased emphasis on penalties against DBs came after another noteworthy Peyton Manning post-season meltdown.

Last edited by Pack-Man

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×