Skip to main content

Just pissing a bit here.  From another thread talking about Jordy and I wish there was a site with diagrams for all the plays to see which routes he ran during the game.  How hard can it be to put something like that together? It should be part of the game book.  The NFL is still horrible with a couple things: 

  • Developing more meaningful visuals.  They seem to put no effort into this.  Drive charts are nice, but there should be a way to see a schematic of how each play developed.   
  • Not allowing content on youtube. The league with the best youtube policy is the nhl. Every highlight is up and posted by the NHL.  There's no problem sharing the plays with other fans during a discussion and they don't go after fan posted videos.  There's no way to embed an NFL .com or packer.com video here or anywhere.
  • The mess of a celebration that is the awarding of the Super Bowl trophy.  They really need to stop the press from storming the field. Allow the teams to shake hands.  Allow the winners to share the moment with their team mates instead of being mobbed by every yahoo with a microphone or a camera.  Once they get the trophy then let the families come onto the field.  Could care less if the press gets access to the players while they're still on the field.  I can't remember one quote from the field the last time the packers won the Super Bowl.  Only thing I remember is Jennings' daughter saying what a mess all the confetti was.         

/rant

 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Good post.

 

JMO in order.

 

  • I think the NFL thinks 75 plus % of their fan base wouldn't understand a cover two from a single high and simply wants QB ratings and give away/take away stats as the ceiling of what they're ready to digest.  I'm guessing fans that dive into advanced stats and information is pretty small. I'm sure the NFL has run plenty of ROI analysis and decided loudly yammering on about nothing in particular still draws a crowd. Shame they don't devote a few hours of programing / content to fans that want more though.
  • No idea. Fans are going to share the info one way or another. Should make it easier.
  • Like your Youtube comment, the NHL has it all over every other major sport in America. Nothing beats the NHL post game handshake and trophy presentation. I used to love the NFL commissioner getting an Olympia Beer / Champagne shower in the SB winning team locker room growing up while Don Criqui consoled a despondent Bud Grant outside the silent losers locker room.... The "everything has to be staged and presented within a carefully structured media friendly platform driven to portray inclusiveness while embracing NFL heritage" is getting old because if there's anything that NEEDS to break away from a cookie cutter staged approach to sameness it should be the wildly random and irrational response of handing a trophy to 53 guys that just spent 7 months sacrificing everything for the other 53 guys.  

A big thing for me is show the starters for the SECOND half.  Guys get benched or hurt and  it's hard to tell who is on the field sometimes.

 

Also, I love it when they play classic rock or cool music as they head into a comercial break.

 

No scrolls on the bottom of the screen!  We all have internet, very distracting and unnecessary.

I could go for a lot more x's and o's between plays and a lot less 'dramatic' sideline shots of coaches/players/owners in their boxes.

Rusty had the right idea about the announcers. Play-by-play is a holdover from the golden age of radio, and is useless in today's world. Graphics can provide any info needed on a particular play, and other stats should be an interactive feature.

quote:
Also, I love it when they play classic rock or cool music as they head into a comercial break.

To be honest, I could do without this.  And I could really do without the music video-style highlights presentation we increasingly seem to get roughly after the third quarter.  Although that's more sports broadcasting in general, not just the NFL.

I've thought this forever and I know they experimented with it for one game---but broadcasting the game without announcers.....even the most novice fans don't need to have the constant droning on about whatever.

I'm guessing--different transmissions with alternative audio feed could be done as easily as turning closed caption on and off...but it will never happen because they have the announcers hocking so many products...

I love the crowd noise, but have watched many a game in silence because of the announcers

Originally Posted by Johnson:

I've thought this forever and I know they experimented with it for one game---but broadcasting the game without announcers.....

Personally, I would hate this, but that said, maybe they should include this sort of option with their Sunday Ticket.  You can have a choice to either watch the games with announcers or without announcers yet still hear the sounds of the fans in the stadium, etc. 

 

I seem to remember that experiment was done back in the '80s and I personally preferred having announcers.  That said, there are some announcers that are just awful out there and there don't seem to be as many great ones like there were in the past like Gowdy, Summerall, etc. 

Originally Posted by Pikes Peak:

Get more interesting, viable teams.  Check this weeks schedule and other than the Monday nite game which one is must see football?  

Indeed. That's why the push for an 18 game season is so ridiculous. We don't need more crappy games. And we already have an 18 game season.

Its called "the playoffs. "

I'd be interested in having the local radio call married to the broadcast. TVs are all equipped with SAP ( Secondary Audio Program) to allow for Spanish broadcasts so it would be fairly simple to set that up. Then I don't have to listen to the network guys and can hear the local call with Wayne and Larry instead. Right now, I hit the mute button 50 times a game

 

I'd also like to see the networks fined massively every time they come back late from a commercial, missing actual football action. That egregious

 

from Larsee's linked article above:

At one point, I walked up to Goodell and tried to ask how much safer he believed football could actually be made. Instead of answering, he looked away and a burly member of his security detail inserted himself between us and said "No questions."

typical

They did try the no-commentators on a game once and it fully bombed.  But today you could use a lot more available live audiot than they had access to back then.  Especially interesting would be helmet communications on both sides of the ball and calls at the line.  But I do like the radio/tv sync idea.  Not techy enough to have set that up yet.  Dealing with the delay is the bugger for me.

Originally Posted by Fedya:
quote:
Have bare breasted cheerleaders, wearing lacy panties, dance on the field in between plays.

Just make certain they're female.

 

We already have the male equivalent.  

 

Priceless SJ.

I will forever be thankful for Buck's comment to Aikmen after Aikmen was jabbering about a certain player getting "blasted in the chin".

 

"And you definitely know a lot about getting blasted in the chin". 

Originally Posted by ChilliJon:

Good post.

 

JMO in order.

 

  • I think the NFL thinks 75 plus % of their fan base wouldn't understand a cover two from a single high and simply wants QB ratings and give away/take away stats as the ceiling of what they're ready to digest.  I'm guessing fans that dive into advanced stats and information is pretty small. I'm sure the NFL has run plenty of ROI analysis and decided loudly yammering on about nothing in particular still draws a crowd. Shame they don't devote a few hours of programing / content to fans that want more though.

The networks are the ones who choose how each game is shown.  I don't think the NFL could dictate to the networks to cut out the yappy announcers who single out praise for the three or four players whose names they bothered to learn that week.   I am not sure if the current TV deal would allow it, but it would be nice if the networks could simulcast their game into two options - the regular game for casual fans and an X's and O's game for the hardcore viewers.  Each network already has multiple sports channels at their disposal (even if CBS has to use TruTV).

Now that AM620 is streaming the broadcast, I take the time to sync the 'radio' stream with the TV.  Of course when I am watching a stream I am stuck with the announcers, but getting the pleasure to listen to Larry and Wayne, even if it means fiddling with the DVR every other commercial or so..

 

IT. IS. SO. WORTH. IT.!!!!!!111 one 111!!!!!

Not allowing content on youtube.

You can breathe easy....From what I hear, once Sunday Ticket isn't exclusive on DTV anymore....Look for Google (youtube) to have the contract on a per game basis. They're going where-ever the money is

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×