Skip to main content

Was at the game today and am not going to post my thoughts on anything until tomorrow except I've got to ask those who watched it on TV, was Jake Ryan really as bad as he looked to those of us sitting near midfield behind the Packer bench?

I mean the way Cardinals rookie RB David Johnson ran by him, shed his tackles, and faked him out of his jock (on a play down by the 15-yard line), it looked like A.J. Hawk on one his worst days. I also saw Ryan just getting swallowed up by Cardinal lineman over and over again.

Overall, the D was not terrible today and not the primary reason we lost, but Ryan's poor play really stood out and if he looks this unathletic as a rookie, I have serious doubts if he is ever going to be one of the answers at ILBer.

Then again, perhaps I was seeing things that were not really there during the most craptastic Packer game I've ever attended -- and that includes the playoff loss in S.F. after the 98' season, so let me know of Jake looked as bad as I thought he did.

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

It seems all the ILBs we have had except for Bishop and Clay have all played the exact same way...read/react, don't attack, tackle 5 yards down field, etc. I'm guessing it's a Winston Moss issue, but who knows. Could be that's the kind of ILB Capers wants. Could be the kind of ILB that TT wants. I would be okay if we had an ILB like Clay who attacked all the team, even if he doesn't make the play every time. If you're gonna miss, miss big. All these guys seem to not only miss, but miss even when they're standing there waiting for the ball carrier to come to them. An attacking ILB who can hit would make a huge difference on this team.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×