When he said that the Packers are predictable. They are. On both sides of the ball. There was a time when it didn't matter on the offensive side. That's no longer the case. The Packers are just as mediocre there as they have been on defense. The Lions, yes, the Detroit Lions lined up and did something defensively that MM had suggested few teams outside of the Bronco's could do. You press the WR's, who have all the speed and agility I possess after a 3 pc. all white and jumbo drink, you make a frustrated Rodgers hold the ball. There's been more than adequate time to throw in a few of the games. Nobody gets open. Rodgers has started relying on rolling out of the pocket way too often just to get an open receiver. Lots of holding penalties on the OL as a result because the blocking angles change. Minimal gains when he runs because the vertically challenged receivers aren't making db's and linebackers vacate the area. They just play the receiver one on one until it's long yardage. And the running game is non-existent in large part because they won't really commit to it.
Somebody said that the Packers defense played well Sunday. Somebody else claimed they've improved this season. I can't agree on either of those points. They played better than the offense against a Lions team that had shown no running game. Until the offense finally scored that is. Watching Hayward chasing Matt Stafford on that back breaking 3rd and 9 and not being able to catch him before the diving tackle attempt was particularly distressing.