Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Mr.Yuck:

Gotta love homers....Listening to KC sports radio 810 WHB this morning. They did a very quick comparison of the two teams roster this morning.....Other then QB, the Chiefs are at worst a wash against the Pack at WR and O-line and better at the Pack when it comes to D-line, RB, TE, Linebacker, Safety and potentially CB. 

 

So based on that.... Chefs 56-Don't have a chance Packers 3

So what did you take issue with? Jamal Charles is a better all around back than a banged up Lacy, and maybe better than a healthy Lacy.

 

Maclin is at least the equal of Cobb. The rest are a toss up. 

 

The OL as a group is about even with Bulaga out. 

 

DL has to go to KC.

 

LBs has to go to KC.

 

DBs would be a slight KC advantage if they were healthy so I'd give a slight edge to GB.

 

Depth certainly goes to GB. They can run all sorts of guys onto the field and they get performance from them. KC doesn't have that and it showed.

 

Then the QB goes to GB. The QB tips the field. The other guys do not.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×