Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I know that we haven't won every road game in Detroit that Rodgers was starting QB, but it feels like we've won almost all of them when he was in there.  The only one I remember NOT winning with Rodgers as the starter was in 2010 when he got a concussion and Matt Flynn had to finish.

If it wasn't for Aaron Rodgers, I'd expect a Lions win, but the bottom line is, as long as Rodgers is out there and not completely paralyzed, the Lions aren't going to win.  Hell, just 3 years ago the Lions mostly outplayed the Packers for about 59 minutes and 59 seconds but that last second didn't work out for them so well (Rodgers threw the greatest Hail Mary pass I have ever seen) and the Lions still found a way to lose.

Edit:  I do see the Lions beat the Pack fair and square in Detroit in 2014 with Rodgers as a starter.  I think this was just before he told us all to "relax". 

This will be a tougher test for the defense, that's for sure.

Here's how the 2 teams compare statistically speaking (offensively):

 Rush AttemptsRush YardsRush TDsYards/AttPass Comp/AttPass YardsPass TDs
Detroit8639214.6114/17111708
Green Bay9140814.5103/16410767

 

Detroit's defense have given up 114 points, while the Packers defense have given up 83.

So far, the 2 offenses look similar, while the Packers defense fared quite a bit better as far as giving up points.

I need to find the link again but I think the Lions defense is giving up something like 170 yards a game on the ground per game.   I would love to see the Packers turn loose Jones in the running game and use some play action to loosen things up for the rookie receivers.   Offensively, I bet we see when they do pass the really quick passes.   

Thunderbird posted:

According to the stats on NFL.com (where I got the stats from my previous post), the lions are giving up 157.8 yards per game.

Packers are giving up 107.8

That is correct for RUSHING yards on a per game basis defensive stats only. 

But when both passing & rushing are combined, GB has given up 326.2 yards per game, and the Lions have given up 329.5 yards per game.  Not much difference.  I used nfl.com too.  

watching their game last week, big weeks should be in the slot for gb, te across the middle for gb and the deep ball.  they are ok against the run, even though 21 gashed them.  our defense needs to watch the wr's - tate is really shifty - i can also see him goading 23 into a penalty or 2.  overall, since i will be there, packers 43, loins 13.  mark it down.

Ghost of Lambeau posted:

My prediction:

Somehow AR coaxes 5 TDs out of this offense (which GB will need) (and to solidify his HOF credentials)  as the Packers win 35-28.  Crosby will be limited to extra points.  

This. It’s a nice change for the Packers D to step it up when the offense sputters like they did last week, but I don’t think AR much cares for his offense being outshined by the D.  I expect a big game from him. Hopefully the D can hold up their end again this week. 

Only real concern is WR for this week, every other position should be at full strength. We may get a chance to see if this is our deepest position group as most thought coming out of camp. Too bad Kumerow is out, he may have gotten some opportunities this week. Lions have some injuries of their own most notably to guard TJ Lang (concussion), which will result in a backup having to block Daniels / Clark. 

BrainDed posted:

Actually in the jsonline article it said that Monty practices with the WR group a little bit every week. 

That contradicts what Wilde mentioned on the radio earlier this week. Also, McCarthy has commented that Ty is a RB, and that's the position he practices and plays. 

This came up last year when they drafted 3RBs and let Jordy go. McCarthy then said Ty is a RB.



Could Ty play WR in a pinch? Sure. But McStubborn likes the plan he sets in the summer and does not knee jerk change. 

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×