Skip to main content

Really long, but a really good read. It probably captures how superstar athletes struggle when they retire better than anything I've read. Montana supposedly took 15 years to recover from retiring and still gets upset now that the Niners wouldn't give his job back after he got hurt and they benched him for Steve Young. Some great interviews with Steve Young and Ronnie Lott. It talks about how bitter Montana is that Brady is now considered the GOAT.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story...acy-ahead-super-bowl

Bitterness is such a common affliction of once-great athletes that it's only noteworthy when absent. Ted Williams burned every family photo. Michael Jordan kept trying to get down to his playing weight of 218 years after his retirement. The story goes that Mickey Mantle used to go sit in his car during rainstorms, drunk and crying, because the water hitting the roof sounded like cheers. Joe and Jennifer's front door is just around the corner, maybe a three-minute walk, from the house DiMaggio bought for his parents with his first big check in 1937 and where he moved when he retired from baseball in 1951. He and Marilyn Monroe spent their wedding night there. The Marina remained full of memories for him. DiMaggio loved to sit alone there and stare out to sea as if looking for a returning vessel. The two Joes knew each other in the 1980s but weren't friends. DiMaggio was much closer to Joe's mother, who worked as a teller at the branch where the Yankee legend banked.

Last edited by MichiganPacker
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Montana and Brady had one thing in common.  If they were within striking distance of a winning score in the 4th quarter, both had an incredible ability to focus and play their best in those moments.

Montana possibly could have won a couple more titles if he stayed healthy but he just never was quite the same from 1990 until the end of his career.  And make no mistake, even beaten to a pulp and still past his prime he still was a fantastic player.  His body just couldn’t take as much punishment after that final Super Bowl win in early β€˜90.

@fightphoe93 posted:

Montana and Brady had one thing in common.  If they were within striking distance of a winning score in the 4th quarter, both had an incredible ability to focus and play their best in those moments.

Montana possibly could have won a couple more titlesif he stayed healthy but he just never was quite the same from 1990 until the end of his career.  And make no mistake, even beaten to a pulp and still past his prime he still was a fantastic player.  His body just couldn’t take as much punishment after that final Super Bowl win in early β€˜90.

I would imagine one of the reasons Montana "couldn't stay healthy" was because when he played, defenders didn't draw roughing calls for sacking the QB. Or for hitting the QB multiple times per game. 

Over the course of TB's career (and every other QB in that timeframe), pressuring/hitting the QB has become more and more archaic/impossible. 

Great article and thanks for posting.  After reading that I am reminded just how great Montana was and he did it in an era where defenders weren't flagged as frequently for roughing. 

To me Brady and Montana are the best QBs of all time they just have that cool factor that seemed to really come out in the 4th quarter with everything on the line.  Just imagine if he had stayed healthy how much more he would have won and I think his stats would have been even better.

What's crazy to me is that even with all the injuries he still threw for 40,000 yards and 273 TDs in an era where defenses could pretty much tee off on a QB without getting flagged like they do now.

@ammo posted:

I know we discussed this before as to whether Montana could have been a Packer or not.  But could imagine Starr, then Montana, then Favre and Rodgers as Packer QBs?  A hell of a lot more than 4 Super Bowl victories.

Having Montana would likely mean not getting Favre.  Too many things would have been changed by Montana.  But the question within that question is how successful would Montana have been in GB?

Last edited by DH13
@DH13 posted:

Having Montana would likely mean not getting Favre.  Too many things would have been changed by Montana.  But the question within that question is how successful would Montana have been in GB?

That is a great question.  It's fun to talk about but I honestly believe that any legendary QB could have changed the direction of the Packers franchise back then.  Sure they had some decent players but the franchise was a mess and I don't think they would have taken the next step.  Maybe he could have had a good season here and there but the Packers had terrible defenses back then and IMHO that would have kept them from winning Super Bowls. 

But, as DH13 said if he had been successful more than likely they would not have gotten Favre and perhaps even we would have not gotten Harlen to run the team.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×