Skip to main content

I love the new definition of questionable as I'm pretty sure MM was a key consultant. Right up there with "has a knee".

NFL drops “probable” from injury report, redefines “questionable” and “doubtful

571007-madden9206

It’s definite that “probable” no longer will be part of the NFL injury lexicon.

As first noted (as best we can tell) by Armando Salguero of the Miami Herald and as the league office confirms, the widely-misconstrued P-word has been dumped from the injury reporting procedures.

“The ‘Probable’ category was eliminated from the Game Status Report because approximately 95 percent of the players who were listed as ‘Probable’ in prior years did in fact play in the game,” the league explained.

There was a reason for that high percentage of participation. Although many believed that “probable” suggested a 75-percent likelihood of playing, it actually meant that the player was virtually certain to be available for normal duty. After the Falcons scratched quarterback Mike Vick, who had been listed as probable with a knee injury, from a 2005 game against New England, the league reminded teams of the true meaning of “probable,” and it began routinely investigating situations in which a player listed as “probable” did not actually play.

The NFL also has changed the meaning of “questionable” and “doubtful”; previously, the “questionable” category reflected a 50-50 likelihood of playing, and “doubtful” meant a 75-percent chance the player wouldn’t play. Now, “questionable” simply means that “it is uncertain as to whether the player will play in the game,” and “doubtful” means that “it is unlikely the player will participate.”

So, basically, any player whose chances of playing are less than 100 percent is “questionable,” and any player whose chances of playing are 49.9999 percent of less is “doubtful.” While these changes streamline the process, they create a much broader range for “questionable,” allowing visiting teams to keep the truly injured players under wraps until they head to the site of the game and leave the injured players behind. For home teams, the question of whether a “questionable” player will play won’t be finally resolved until the list of inactive players is filed 90 minutes prior to kickoff.

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

First person you gotta think of is Billy B. 

He's the one coach that has the biggest problem with the injury report.

No surprise in a GAME VS. the PATRIOTS....Vick was "Probable" then scratched.

I'm certain Billy B didn't make a stink about that!

No you know why Tom Brady is routinely on the injury report with a "Questionable" designation when everyone on the planet KNOWS he's playing.

The more I hear.....I'm liking the game less & less.....

GiveAFMeter

Attachments

Images (1)
  • GiveAFMeter

This is dumb and only serves to appease fantasy football. I like this aspect of the pregame strategy, it forces the opponent to waste time preparing for a different scenario, even if it's almost certain that player will play. Think about how different defensive game plans were when Jordy went down vs. what they did in 2014. If you could keep defenses or offenses guessing all week, why wouldn't you? 

I have to think the Hoodie loves this. He might list his entire roster as questionable every Wednesday.  

I haven't played fantasy football in years but I have to think this is going to piss off those that do play. You may be setting rosters a few minutes before kickoff.  

Last edited by ChilliJon

Is probable...is questionable.....is doubtful..

It depends on what your definition of is ,is.

Its all subjective I think, but I am probably wrong, at least I question my facts and I doubt they are 100%

Sheese 

Last edited by PackerPatrick

I think this impacts the fantasy folks more than the actual teams.



Think about how different defensive game plans were when Jordy went down vs. what they did in 2014.

Teams really didn't adjust to Jordy's absence though until a few weeks into the season. #blueprint

Don't see how this "cracks down" on anything.

Now, “questionable” simply means that “it is uncertain as to whether the player will play in the game,” and “doubtful” means that “it is unlikely the player will participate.”



Time will tell...

Maybe, maybe not...

Dr. Chao at NFP weighs in:

http://www.nationalfootballpos...ill-cause-confusion/

A new cottage industry will be created. Information on the “questionable” players will be at even more of a premium. The 90-minute inactive list release will take on higher importance. Perhaps the real motivation of this is to create ratings for the pregame shows."

NFLFU, what a bunch of asswipes

The injury report has always existed to acquiesce Vegas. It is used to help them set lines. If teams liberally apply "questionable" up to the release of active lists and it has an adverse effect on Vegas' ability to effectively set lines the NFL is going to have a problem. 

If Vegas starts accumulating some bad beats over last minute roster surprises do they stop taking bets on NFL games?

If bettors that strictly follow the NFL based on betting (it's a big number) start accumulating bad beats over last minute roster surprises do they walk away from NFL action entirely? 

Either way it appears this could backfire on the NFL. 

If Vegas starts accumulating some bad beats over last minute roster surprises do they stop taking bets on NFL games?

It's no worse than the 11-10 game.  (I actually got in trouble here for my comments on that game.)

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×