Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I thought Barnett was very good in 2007 on the run to the NFC Championship game. That said, 2007 was 6 years ago. He got dinged up in 2008 and 2010 and is now going into I think his 11th season.

I liked Barnett more than most here, but I totally agree that I'd be pretty hesitant to say he's anything better than what the Pack has right now. He's fairly close to done if not completely cooked.
quote:
Originally posted by trump:
No Sh?t ... Hawks' twin and Barnett was the "weak twin".


Barnett's always made more plays than Hawk, more sacks, picks, forced fumbles, TDs, passes defensed, more average tackles/season, etc. Hawk had one more sack this season, that's it, and no other big plays and this was Barnett's worst year for big plays.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/_/id/4487/nick-barnett
http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/_/id/9591/aj-hawk

I would have been curious to see a Bishop/Barnett combo but at this point Barnett's older also (though only two years older than Hawk who runs like he's teh elder by half a decade).
quote:
Originally posted by Herschel:
quote:
Originally posted by trump:
No Sh?t ... Hawks' twin and Barnett was the "weak twin".


Barnett's always made more plays than Hawk, more sacks, picks, forced fumbles, TDs, passes defensed, more average tackles/season, etc. Hawk had one more sack this season, that's it, and no other big plays and this was Barnett's worst year for big plays.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/_/id/4487/nick-barnett
http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/_/id/9591/aj-hawk

I would have been curious to see a Bishop/Barnett combo but at this point Barnett's older also (though only two years older than Hawk who runs like he's teh elder by half a decade).


Yeah. my bad ... they were both weak.JMO

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×