Skip to main content

After the Flynn debacle in Seattle, Oakland and Buffaloโ€ฆโ€ฆI donโ€™t think teams are going to be trading for another Packers backup QB anytime soon.  Much like how Rodgers suffered b/c of the โ€œTedford QBโ€ stigma, backup QBs on the Packers have to deal with Flynnโ€™s failure and the stigma that Packerโ€™s QBs look good in MMโ€™s system and thatโ€™s it. 

 

Also, I would not be comfortable with Hundley as the top backup this year.  Iโ€™d rather Bulaga at LT and Barclay/Tretter at RT than I would Hundley instead of Tolzien.  

Originally Posted by Trophies:

How many here would trade Scott Tolzien for a starting calibre LT?

 

Oddly enough, both BUF and NYJ are QB needy teams. Desperately so. I like Tolzien a lot. The guy is performing very well. Might be an opportunity to get a nice bit of compensation for QB development, while adding an insurance policy to protect Aaron's blindside with Bakhtiari having some knee issues. That would harken back to the Ron Wolf days a bit. Legit backup QB who can start for a legit backup LT who can start.

 

Not even the Jets are that hard up for a QB

 

Originally Posted by Thunderbird:
Originally Posted by Pack-Man:
Originally Posted by heyward:

No team is going to give up anything of value for Starks. Besides, the Packers can't afford to let him go. For all we know, Neal, Harris and Crockett are Sutton, Lumpkin and Nance.

No Herbert "Whisper" Goodman?

Samkon Gado says "Hi"

So does Tony Fisher 

 

Originally Posted by Boris:
Originally Posted by turnip blood:

There is one possible trade the Packers may make at the end of preseason, perhaps they  move a corner, perhaps even Haywood.  

Haywood Jablowme

 

Not a chance....DB's are at a premium

I doubt the Packers would do such a trade, but trading Haywood or another Corner is the most likely trade the Packer might make.  Then again at he last cut they may trade a corner. In short what do I know.

Last edited by turnip blood

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×