Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Just thinking about the season postmortem.  Compared to 2023, the defense, in general, was better this year.  We definitely had a better kicker. Our running game was better.  But the passing game clearly took a major step back and that’s why there’s a sour taste.  Was it mainly Love? The receivers? Probably both, and the coaches really need to figure it out over the next few months if the team is going to take the next step.

Doubs needs to look at his long term health. He may be done as a football player.  Not sure if Watson is just unlucky or is really made of glass.  Just can't depend on him.

Hopefully Marshawn Lloyd can get healthy. Looking forward to what he can do next season.  And if you are not going to throw to Musgrave you might as well trade him for D improvement.

@Tschmack posted:

Gute is going to have to have a hell of an offseason.  We clearly need more talent at corner and receiver and linebacker.  Also need to consider DL.  

This team is closer to 8 wins (average) than 12+ (contender).

Pack went 4-0 against the awful AFC South and 4-0 against the surprisingly bad NFC West in 2024 (including the Rams without Nacua and Kupp).

Got to think playing the AFC North and NFC East will be a bit more difficult in 2025.

@SteveLuke posted:

Pack went 4-0 against the awful AFC South and 4-0 against the surprisingly bad NFC West in 2024 (including the Rams without Nacua and Kupp).

Got to think playing the AFC North and NFC East will be a bit more difficult in 2025.

Steelers and Browns are not exactly powerhouses and the Giants are likely to be terrible.

If Love plays to his contract, it won't matter who will they play. If we've seen the best of him already, it also won't matter who they play.

@lovepack posted:

Maybe a rep or two in the preseason would help.

Yep. Plus this year he needs to be taking reps in camp on day 1.  He couldn’t do that with the contract situation this past year.

I still have some hope Love has another level he can hit.  That said, if we don’t see him step it up a notch next year, he probably never will.

I don't think Doubs is a Tua-type guy. He seems much more introspective and has a better grasp on what's important in life, given how it appears his family means so much to him. He had the special cap on, didn't hit that hard, it was on grass, and he still suffered what looks to be a major concussion.  It wouldn't surprise me one bit if he walks away from the game after today.

GB is stuck with Love for a few years.  He needs to be better than average going forward.  I'm not sure he has it in him though.  His decision-making and accuracy are both questionable at best.  

GB needs to find a goto WR in the draft, FA or via trade.  Reed is the best of the bunch but he's a slot guy.  Everybody else is either injury prone or a JAG.  

Just a thought... but maybe, just maybe, MLF should consider throwing the football to the two young stud TEs.  

Morgan has to pan out as a #1 pick and find a home on the OL.  I'd look to upgrade at center as well.

The pass rush is horrible.  Gary is a try-hard guy with a great motor but he is being paid to be a difference-maker.  He isn't.  LVN sucks.  Need help at DE for sure.

GB has a mess at CB.  You can't trust Jaire to stay on the field but he has a ton of talent.  I think GB has to keep him.  I'd try to keep Stokes as well.  He played pretty well during the second half of the season.  CB should be a priority in the off season.  

Cooper is a stud at LB.  I'd stick with Walker as well.  No idea what GB has in Hopper but I'd look to improve that position.  

Good at safety.  

Resign the kicker.

MLF will be back next season but it might be his last if this team underperforms again.  His teams aren't prepared in big moments far too many times, his play calling can be sketchy and his in-game management (Clock) is horrid. This year's version of the Green Bay Packers is worse than last years.  That's a pretty damning statement about MLF and his staff because it's obvious the team has regressed.  And can somebody fix the Special Teams?  Dear God...

Last edited by Pakrz

The Packers can't rely on the draft to plug in starters. They'd be lucky to get one, maybe two from the draft (as starters in their rookie years). As MichiganPackers2 stated above, they don't have any significant contract they need to do in the offseason.  QB is taken care of as is anyone on the roster worth keeping moving forward.  They have plenty of cap room to sign a couple of starters. And I hope Gute does so. I also wouldn't mind trading a high pick or two for an established player(s). Some of us act as if draft picks are gold, unfortunately, they're often fools gold.

@Pakrz posted:

GB is stuck with Love for a few years.  He needs to be better than average going forward.  I'm not sure he has it in him though.  His decision-making and accuracy are both questionable at best.  

GB needs to find a goto WR in the draft, FA or via trade.  Reed is the best of the bunch but he's a slot guy.  Everybody else is either injury prone or a JAG.  



Love will get much better if he has receivers that don't drop the ball 3-4 times a game and can stay healthy.  IMHO I really don't think the issue is Love its the receiving group. Watson has had some unfortunate bad luck with injuries and Doubs has started to miss some time with the bad concussions.

Receiver has to be addressed in FA or the draft and if they can get a couple of guys who can get open and catch the ball Love will be just fine.

I wonder if LaFleur will look for a new WR coach and/or passing game coordinator.  Jason Vrable was the WR coach in 2023 and helped those guys come together as a unit toward the end of the year.  Ryan Mahaffey was promoted to WR in 2024 and we all saw the lack of progression/regression.  Love said it in his press conference after the Eagles game, Tom Brady mentioned it in the broadcast and others have said the passing game is lacking the "details".  I have not heard this explained, but I think this gets down to coaching.  Guys not running routes/spacing correctly, not being where they are supposed to be, etc.  Funny enough, Vrable was the passing game coordinator for 2023 and 2024.

The last two seasons feel like MLF will need to "do something," to quell the criticism of falling short.

On the table...firing Bisaccia to just show he can be a tough guy...and ST have had their issues since RB has been the guy...although vastly improved over the Mo Dray years.

Firing various meaningless position coaches.

Relinquishing play calling so he can "focus more on the entire team," though I am not sure Steno is really an upgrade...definitely a coordinator in name only.

@Pakrz posted:

I'd be okay with Gute signing Stokes to a new contract if it's reasonable.  Stokes played better this season.

5-6 million a year for an average veteran corner is fine. He's a decent #2 corner and a good #3.

I'm guessing someone will give him more than that and he'll be gone.

Good thing we got Tyron Hopper for the Rasul Douglas pick. I hope I can type that sentence without being sarcastic next year at this time.

First job for the organization is to fix the dysfunctional passing offense.

Wood sounds like he was reading my posts about Love not having a #1WR.  All the elite QB's have at least one.  Some have more than one.  Also on adding vets in the offseason.   

A lot of what they said you could have found on this board last week.  If it's that obvious to all of us one would think it's also obvious to Gute.

Last edited by DH13
@The Heckler posted:

Love will get much better if he has receivers that don't drop the ball 3-4 times a game and can stay healthy.  IMHO I really don't think the issue is Love its the receiving group. Watson has had some unfortunate bad luck with injuries and Doubs has started to miss some time with the bad concussions.

Receiver has to be addressed in FA or the draft and if they can get a couple of guys who can get open and catch the ball Love will be just fine.

The issue with changing out the WRs is that it takes guys a lot of reps to get on the same page, and all of their WRs have been here about the same amount of time. They are also all relatively cheap. So, if you clear out the WR room to try to get better, you'll have a pretty steep learning curve.

Watson isn't going to be a factor, and Doubs should probably retire at this point. Reed was disappointing in many respects, but he has a role as a #3 or #4 WR. Wicks will probably stay. Heath and Melton showed why they were UDFAs last night. A great QB can make those guys look better, but Love was not great this year. Heath coming down out of bounds on that 4th down throw wouldn't have happened with a better pass from Love, but most starting caliber NFL WRs (or even #3 WRs) make that catch easily and we don't even notice that throw. The final interception was thrown into triple coverage, but they were under the 2 minute warning down two TDs and they had to take a risk (instead of dinking and dunking the ball for another 90 seconds to maybe score a TD with about 15 seconds left and then need an onside kick and another TD with no timeouts left). Melton was probably interfered with, but he really made a minimal attempt to come back for the ball and just allowed himself to be slow walked out of the play. If he fights back harder and the LB actually knocks him down, maybe they get a call. Doubs or even Watson (who has improved in that aspect) fight back harder to try for the ball. Jefferson, Chase, or D. Adams probably get their hands on that ball.

I don't think it was that Heath and Melton didn't know what to do, it's probably that they just aren't capable of it. They don't have the body control to tap their feet down inbounds or to chance direction and come back for the ball.

They need either need a QB that plays much better than Love did this year. If Love is only ever going to have average accuracy at best, then they need an entirely different WR room next year other than Reed (Watson would be fine too but he might not be back at all).

@Herschel posted:

Always ascending, never peaking isn’t exactly the recipe for winning it all. Always ascending is code for “we drafted slightly less shitty players to replace our previous shitty draft picks who weren’t worth a second contract.”

Even given the difference in the sports given the salary cap in baseball, the Packers are a lot like the Brewers. Both have put a premium on being competitive every year without ever selling out to win in a single year.

The Packers drafted their future QB (Love) using a 1st and a 4th round pick, a RB to replace their RBs that might leave the next year (Dillon - Jones/Williams), and used their 3rd rounder on a bust (DeGuara) in 2020 when they were one win away from the Super Bowl. They are better now with Love than they would have been with a castoff journeyman (Fields, Russell Wilson, Mariota, Winston) for 2 years, but Tee Higgins or Michael Pittman (who would have probably been their choices and they stayed put at 30th overall might have put them over the top in 2020 or 2021.

The incentives for Gute and MLF are the same for most other coaches. A team that will probably win between 7 and 11 games every year gives you job security. A team that may win 13 or 14 for 1-2 years and then bottoms out with 4-6 wins for 2-3 years after that generally gets you fired in Year 5.

The issue with changing out the WRs is that it takes guys a lot of reps to get on the same page, and all of their WRs have been here about the same amount of time. They are also all relatively cheap. So, if you clear out the WR room to try to get better, you'll have a pretty steep learning curve.



They're not going to clear out the WR room.  It made sense after 2022 considering what they had on that roster but there is too much draft capital invested there now.

I think they need 2 guys; an upper tier FA, which will be costly, and another reliable vet #2/3 WR.  The remaining guys can fill out the rest and probably do well if the new guys can draw more attention.

I don't think anyone at 1265 believes Love's accuracy isn't or won't be better than what it was last night.  They are kind of stuck having to believe he can be as good as he showed late last year.  Task #1 is getting him back there and keeping him there.

But Silverstein had a really good point.  They need to figure out what they want to be on offense.  They need to find a legit passing attack and they need to figure out how to fit that passing attack with Josh Jacobs's role.  I'm not sure what that means for the WR room but his suggestion to look at BAL as a precedent was interesting.

Last edited by DH13

Silverstein made a point that I have been thinking about. MLF seems to be conflicted as to what he wants the offense to be. Last year it was spread people out and then when you saw a light box, run Jones. This year it has been more condensed formations and establish Jacobs. I just don't know if that is the best approach for MLF's offense. I think back to his year as OC at the Titans with Derrick Henry, something like 28th in the league in offense. Logic says we should be a smash-mouth team with Jacobs, but we really don't have that type of offensive line.

@FLPACKER posted:

Silverstein made a point that I have been thinking about. MLF seems to be conflicted as to what he wants the offense to be. Last year it was spread people out and then when you saw a light box, run Jones. This year it has been more condensed formations and establish Jacobs. I just don't know if that is the best approach for MLF's offense. I think back to his year as OC at the Titans with Derrick Henry, something like 28th in the league in offense. Logic says we should be a smash-mouth team with Jacobs, but we really don't have that type of offensive line.

The issue with changing out the WRs is that it takes guys a lot of reps to get on the same page, and........

Your full post was pretty good, solid points. But the snippet above is the first sentence in your post, and I don't really agree with it at all.  At least not regarding really good WRs/WR 1. And that's what the Packers need - a veteran, really good WR.  Love has shown he's good enough to play QB in the NFL at a high level (IMO). He would need training camp and preseason reps "to get on the same page" with a really solid WR. I don't see why it would (automatically) take longer.  Plenty of WRs and TEs go to new teams and have immediate impacts.

I think Gute's #1 priority in the offseason would be targeting a true #1 via FA or trade.

Adios Key..

Doubs, man, hang 'em up.  the brain can only take so much.

Talk radio ripped on Jalen Hurts for holding the ball too long.  I think that is bullshit, GB left him alone all day, why not hold the ball.  I think the corners did a good job so it was mostly dink and dunk, but no pass rush with all that investment on the DL is embarrassing.  Need Dean Lowry back. 

As for GB not having an identity on offence... I also think that is bullshit.  Jacobs can be my RB any day.  Great offenses have great passing and great running.  Build for that. 

Agree we need to throw to the TE more.  And more rushing attempts. 

I think GB spends some money this offseason

Can't argue with him not wanting to do KOs; it should be a younger, speedier guy. (and I wonder if they'll even keep the new KO rules) But, I'd also argue that Jaire is your CB1 when healthy and Nixon is 2. But if this is how Nixon handles business -- through the press -- that's not good either. What he said is something you talk to the coaches about privately first, not by opening your yap in public.



As for GB not having an identity on offence... I also think that is bullshit.  Jacobs can be my RB any day.  Great offenses have great passing and great running.  Build for that.



That's what the comment about identity meant.  I don't think being better in one facet means you can't be good in both.  The point Silverstein was making in that video was MLF needs to figure out how to get the passing game working again but also getting it to work with what JJ does best.  That is not as easy as it sounds.

Jacobs is not a third down back that can come in cold and get you 5-6yds or run a precise route as a receiver.  He can catch the ball but his value is in running the ball on a consistent basis.  It's not as easy for your QB to get in rhythm if you're not throwing on a consistent basis.  They need to find the right balance for both to work and make each other better.

Last edited by DH13

I think the current offense is more  condensed is that IHMO  it fits Jacobs style better and because they are forced to run more because  they didn't have Watson for any solid amount of time and Doubs as well.  Those two (and Reed) are the closest thing they have  to receivers the opponents have  to account for. 

I don't  think you need to empty or blow up the receiver room what they need is an influx of talent, a veteran, and mandatory jugs catching passes.

@DH13 posted:

That's what the comment about identity meant.  I don't think being better in one facet means you can't be good in both.  The point Silverstein was making in that video was MLF needs to figure out how to get the passing game working again but also getting it to work with what JJ does best.  That is not as easy as it sounds.

Jacobs is not a third down back that can come in cold and get you 5-6yds or run a precise route as a receiver.  He can catch the ball but his value is in running the ball on a consistent basis.  It's not as easy for your QB to get in rhythm if you're not throwing on a consistent basis.  They need to find the right balance for both to work and make each other better.

Thank you, DH. This is what I have been saying about a "herky-jerky" offense. MLF has not been able to find a good flow in his playcalls between Jacobs' running and Love's passing. If he gets one going, the other sinks. I think Love plays better if he has to throw a lot, and MLF seems to do a better job calling a variety of pass plays than running plays. But he cannot ignore what Jacobs brings to this offense, and he deserves his touches, too. Something has to give or MLF has to figure out how to keep everyone happy because something's not right.

First time poster.... long time lurker....

I would love to see Love more under center.  Play action can make even less than stellar QB's look good.  Defenses will have to guess if it is a run or a pass.... and with Josh Jacobs running style that a real weapon.  We need to invest in o-line and D-line...  and of course corners.  We can take a flyer on a speedy wide out  to help displace the loss of Watson.  Just need to get someone who can catch the ball if it is near them.  With the other receivers we have they can mix up the short to intermediate routes....   But please get some plays for 2 of our most dangerous weapons (Kraft- my fav... and Musgrave)  Musgrave was lost for most of the year... but Kraft should have been used so much more.... and he can be used if we have Love under center and play action....  of course ...the #1 priority is getting a young, fast, bendy... pass rusher... someone that people have to plan for .....  Just my 2 cents....

FWIW, this is how I view the Love/Heath incompletion:
Love is being payed $20+M; Heath's salary is about 2% of that.
It's much more incumbent on the QB to deliver an accurate throw than it is for a depth receiver to make an acrobatic catch.

I noticed a play the Rams ran last night that looked amazingly similar to the Heath attempt; same route, they both made their break from right-to-left, etc., but their receiver was much closer to the numbers as opposed to the sideline.
That makes me wonder if Heath didn't run a route correctly, since McVay's and MLF's offenses are supposed to be similar.

See it at :22 here

Last edited by Timmy!

@RobDemovsky:   First bit of news from Packers coach Matt LaFleur’s season-ending press conference:

Long-time QB coach Tom Clements is retiring. He’s the only guy who’s worked with Brett Favre, Aaron Rodgers and Jordan Love.

LaFleur on Clements: "It's been a cool ride with him for the last three years. ... I know he's meant a lot to this organization, I can't say enough great things about him."

Last edited by ilcuqui
@Timmy! posted:

FWIW, this is how I view the Love/Heath incompletion:
Love is being payed $20+M; Heath's salary is about 2% of that.
It's much more incumbent on the QB to deliver an accurate throw than it is for a depth receiver to make an acrobatic catch.

I noticed a play the Rams ran last night that looked amazingly similar to the Heath attempt; same route, they both made their break from right-to-left, etc., but their receiver was much closer to the numbers as opposed to the sideline.
That makes me wonder if Heath didn't run a route correctly, since McVay's and MLF's offenses are supposed to be similar.

See it at :22 here

It was a C- level throw and a D+ level catch. If that throw goes to a starting caliber WR, it's a catch and we don't even remember it. Yes, you can convincingly argue that a better throw needs to be made so even a practice squad receiver can catch it easily, but you have to have some margin for error. Maybe they can get Lazard back on the minimum for those types of situations (and he's a very good blocking WR).

Darnold was terrible last night, but the TD pass to Hockenson was a terrible throw and Hockenson adjusted like it was nothing.

If the Packers want to lure Tae back, one sure fire way to do it is hire Keith Williams as WR coach. He is part of the outgoing Saints staff. He is the one who found Tae in HS and recruited him to Fresno State. Also found James Jones at San Jose State. Worked with both extensively in the off-season when they were in their first few years in the league.

Whether they want Tae or not, Williams would be a phenomenal hire given how many young WR we have.

@Timmy! posted:

If Davante wanted to play with Carr in LV, why wouldn't he want to play with him in NO?

He did...but the Saints didn't have interest in meeting the Raiders price.

Packers would have to meet the Jets price, but all things being equal, Dub (Williams) gives you the edge. Also, whether Tae comes or not isn't the biggest benefit of this...it's getting a quality WR coach to coach the dropped balls out of our corps.

After watching the LaFleur press conference, it seems pretty clear to me that both the OL and DL need revamping.  Hafley couldn't play the defense he was brought in for given the player talent he had.  LaFleur couldn't run the offense he wanted either. 

Myers was really a weak link on the OL.  Rhyan is adequate, hopefully he continues to get better.  Jenkins is really the only plus interior OL they have currently.  If you want the pass game (protection) and run game to improve, it has to start there.  The tackles are good enough.  Tom had a bad game against the Eagles, but overall a great season and is going to get paid.  Walker had a good end to the season.  He needs to play consistent all the way through.

@50k Club posted:

After watching the LaFleur press conference, it seems pretty clear to me that both the OL and DL need revamping.  Hafley couldn't play the defense he was brought in for given the player talent he had.  LaFleur couldn't run the offense he wanted either.

Myers was really a weak link on the OL.  Rhyan is adequate, hopefully he continues to get better.  Jenkins is really the only plus interior OL they have currently.  If you want the pass game (protection) and run game to improve, it has to start there.  The tackles are good enough.  Tom had a bad game against the Eagles, but overall a great season and is going to get paid.  Walker had a good end to the season.  He needs to play consistent all the way through.

Myers likely coming back if the Packers have anything to say about it. He's best FA center under 30. Not a great year for C in the draft...I'll address that in the draft thread.

@WesHod:  Brian Gutekunst says Christian Watson is the only #Packers player who will have a preexisting injury that'll linger into 2025. Hasn't had surgery yet (which I think everyone is aware of)

@RobDemovsky:  Packers GM Brian Gutekunst insisted there is no disconnect between Jaire Alexander and the team.

“There’s frustration from both sides that he can’t get out there.”

Gutekunst said his contract isn’t prohibitive on a return but “we’ll work through that.”

@WesHod:  @mattschneidman asks #Packers GM Brian Gutekunst about if he'd like to bring back Brandon McManus: "We would. I had a good conversation with him before he left."

Adds that he'd like to keep that specialist core together.

Last edited by ilcuqui
@The Heckler posted:

Love will get much better if he has receivers that don't drop the ball 3-4 times a game and can stay healthy.  IMHO I really don't think the issue is Love its the receiving group. Watson has had some unfortunate bad luck with injuries and Doubs has started to miss some time with the bad concussions.

Receiver has to be addressed in FA or the draft and if they can get a couple of guys who can get open and catch the ball Love will be just fine.

The drops were ridiculous this year.

how do we fix that?

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×