Skip to main content

quote:
The Packers' 10-3 win means the Eagles, with one of the worst pass defenses in the NFL, an unsettled situation at right cornerback, and a rookie seventh-round pick starting at safety, will begin the playoffs against a potent passing attack led by quarterback Aaron Rodgers.

"He's one of the best quarterbacks in the league, so we've got our work cut out for us," Eagles defensive coordinator Sean McDermott said Sunday. McDermott had already been scouting the Packers, who controlled their destiny and punched their ticket to Philadelphia despite playing the Bears' starters for the entire game

SNIP-

Instead of facing the mistake-prone Giants or inexperienced Buccaneers, the Eagles will play a team with a ferocious pass rush and excellent quarterback. Rodgers finished the regular season with 28 passing touchdowns (sixth most before the Sunday night game) against 11 interceptions. He had a 101.2 passer rating, third-best in the NFL.

"He's elusive. He's accurate. He throws the ball on time. He knows where everyone is," said linebacker Stewart Bradley, who is expected to be back Sunday, matching wits with Rodgers as the defensive signal-caller. "He's obviously a cerebral guy. He's definitely a tough quarterback to play against."

Facing any talented quarterback, the Eagles have the same approach: Get in his face and knock him down. But there are two problems with that philosophy against Rodgers. The Eagles' pass rush slowed down late in the season, and Rodgers, according to McDermott, has fared even better against the blitz than not.

Packers quarterbacks have been sacked 38 times, tied for 11th in the NFL. That includes 17 sacks in the last five games. The Eagles, though, have not recorded more than two sacks in a game since facing the Bears Nov. 28. Their best pass rusher, Trent Cole, has just one sack in the last four games he's played, and the defensive-line rotation is thinner with Brandon Graham out for the year.

Read more http://www.philly.com/philly/s...s.html#ixzz1A0utScFL
Watch sports videos you won't find anywhere else


On Bradley, the Eagles chief signal caller, Reid calls it "a strech" he'll be able to play on Sunday.

Also from ESPNs Mosley (who covers the Eagles):

3 things to watch against the Packers

quote:

3.
The Eagles' secondary is about to encounter perhaps the best group of receivers in the league.

The Packers' receivers do a tremendous job of running after the catch, as the Giants learned last week. If Rodgers gets in a groove early, the Eagles could be in trouble. The Eagles have given up 31 passing touchdowns this season, which ranks them right behind the Cowboys in terms of worst in the NFC. Rodgers thrives on finding his receivers on crossing routes and watching them add 20 or 30 yards to the play. The Eagles' defensive backs must do a much better job tackling against this group. The Eagles have the offensive firepower to keep up in a shootout, but Reid doesn't want it to come to that. Philadelphia's biggest flaw is its defense, and the Packers have the weapons to expose it. Fortunately for the Eagles, the Packers' offensive tackles have struggled at times. This is the type game when defensive end Trent Cole's ability to get leverage will help in a big way. And the Eagles must figure out a way to keep defensive end Juqua Parker from playing too many snaps. D-end Darryl Tapp made some nice plays against the Cowboys on Sunday and the Eagles need him to continue his strong play. But I can't imagine a better first-round matchup than this. If you can think of the last No. 6 seed that looked this scary, let me know.

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfceast


Always interesting to see how the opposing teams media outlets see GB.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Bradley isn't expected to play -that's a big loss for the Eagles if he doesn't come back.

Vick isn't "100" percent per Reid and Vick himself but is expected to play and be ok by game time. Without a doubt he'll play. How mobile will he be? Im sure his week off helped.

Jackson has a foot injury but is also expected to play.

They also have some banged up O-line guys.

Samuel should be fine.
http://www.philadelphiaeagles....&module=HP_headlines

"Vick used the week to heal his injured quad and get some much needed rest before the playoff run. While he's not quite 100 percent, he's a lot closer to full speed than he would have been had the team needed him to play Sunday afternoon.

"I feel a lot better just having the opportunity to rehab and focus on getting my leg better," Vick said. "Taking it one day at a time has been great for me. The time off has been great and I took full advantage of it."
"
BAldinger on NFL Network said the PAckers wont be able to contend with the speed of Vick, Maclin, Jackson and McCoy on the new playing surface just installed at the Linc.

thoughts? How do we deal with this so called speed on defense?



One problem Id like to see corrected is catching the frikkin ball, both by the WR and the DBs. cant be dropping first downs and interceptions at the rate we appear to be.
Hopefully the ST keeps it going into the playoffs. It is very evident the impact a good punt/coverage can have on the D. It's a great time for them to be peaking, if that is possible.

Masthay has been nas-tay.
quote:
Originally posted by WolfPack:
BAldinger on NFL Network said the PAckers wont be able to contend with the speed of Vick, Maclin, Jackson and McCoy on the new playing surface just installed at the Linc.

thoughts? How do we deal with this so called speed on defense?


Unless they recarpeted the stadium in the last 6 days, it's the same playing surface on which the Vikings chased Vick up one side of the field and down the other last week. We've got a much better defense than they do, so if they were able to manage it, I don't see why we can't, too.
quote:
Originally posted by Salmon Dave:
quote:
Originally posted by WolfPack:
BAldinger on NFL Network said the PAckers wont be able to contend with the speed of Vick, Maclin, Jackson and McCoy on the new playing surface just installed at the Linc.

thoughts? How do we deal with this so called speed on defense?


Unless they recarpeted the stadium in the last 6 days, it's the same playing surface on which the Vikings chased Vick up one side of the field and down the other last week. We've got a much better defense than they do, so if they were able to manage it, I don't see why we can't, too.


Baldy said they did just re-carpet.
quote:
BAldinger on NFL Network said the PAckers wont be able to contend with the speed of Vick, Maclin, Jackson and McCoy on the new playing surface just installed at the Linc.

thoughts? How do we deal with this so called speed on defense?



Thoughts? Yea... Baldinger can take a sweet suck of my ass for making such a stupid comment.
So the Packers won't be running on the same surface? Like they have anyone to cover the Packers receivers?

When morons like Bald dinger start making assanine comments like this, forgetting the Packers have Clay Matthews who ran around the whole Beagles OL the first game, it makes guys like Colin Cowsquirts look semi-intelligent.

Why even bother having dumb asses like this joker doing any coverage?
quote:
Originally posted by artis:

Baldy said they did just re-carpet.


Since last Tuesday? That's not a 5 or 6 day job. That's got to be the same field they played on last week.

But regardless of what field they're playing on, we have the personnel to match up with them. If the Vikings can handle their speed, we can handle their speed. I don't see this is a major issue.

Edit: And jeez, I almost forgot - it's the same damned field we beat them on 4 months ago. They didn't get any faster since September, and I doubt we got that much slower.
quote:
Originally posted by Salmon Dave:
Since last Tuesday? That's not a 5 or 6 day job. That's got to be the same field they played on last week.


I have no idea WTF Baldinger is talking about. There is no news piece that I could find about that field getting redone. Closest that may have happened is parts of the field got a redo because of the snow and weather they had a week ago.

But as you've pointed out and especially in January there isn't a way you could lie down an entirely new surface and have it take in such little time.

And the field was in it's "fastest" shape in September and our defense handled it. See Clay Matthews that game.
He's nothing more than a blowhard that never had anything good to say when he did Packers' game working for FOX. I hope the Packers use this to fire them up for the game.

I think Raji is going to make the middle of the field an issue for Philly too. They have a banged up Center with their starter knocked out earlier in the year. Their guards have been hurt too.
Eagles gave up a franchise record 31 TD passes and 50 sacks this year (most since 1998). 50 sacks allowed tied for 2nd worst in NFL. Packers threw 31 TD passes and had 47 sacks this year. 47 sacks were tied for 2nd most in NFL.
quote:
Originally posted by Timmy!:
quote:
Originally posted by Blair Kiel:
My wife just re-carpeted.

Brazilian.


I don't believe you at all, BK.
I think we need pictures for a bona fide.
Anxiously awaiting your reply.


She's a history buff:

Philly seems to have a lot of guys banged up

Wasn't aware that Graham was out for the year. He's a good pass rusher. Also didn't know that Bradley was dinged up.

It seems to me that it's key for the Packers to come out aggressive and go after the Eagles right away. Since the Eagles blitz a lot Rodgers will have some opportunities to hit big plays downfield. The WRs need to make the most of those plays.
quote:
Originally posted by TD:
I've done a bunch of searches on Lincoln Financial Field amd I could find nothing. Does Baldwanger have some secret knowledge that no one else does?


http://www.philadelphiaeagles....id=10226&play_clip=y

I couldnt find anything either, but on NFL Network he said it plain as day.

In the above interview he mentions it as well.

who knows wtf hes talking about
Carpet aside, these are not the same two teams that played each other in week one.

Offensively, we had Grant for part of the game. And we also tried to force the ball to Finley to much in my estimation. Especially since he was double covered a lot. It was also a game Clifton was having his issues trying to keep up and the talk at the time was that he looked old. Tauscher played that game as well and now we have Bulaga playing there. For the Eagles, yes we faced a healthy Vick. But has gotten dinged up a bit since then too.

Defensively, we had a rookie starting his first NFL game at safety. We also had a rookie starting his first NFL game at the nickel back position. One is out for the year and the other has gotten experience since. Factor in all the other defensive changes, only Matthews will look familiar to them come game time. You could argue that Capers and his staff did more with less. And with the changes came improvement. The Eagle defense and how it has changed was discussed in the opening post in this thread.

So we will see how these changes affect the up coming game. In a way, I'm glad we won't be facing the Bears for a second week in a row.
Yeah, because I don't know if our D could handle everything the Bears offense would throw at them in a matchup ...

According to 670-Score radio this evening, the Bears played vanilla offense so as not to show anything new.

Ooooooo, that offense is so scarewee .....
FYI - on NFLN Coaches corner, Billick and Mora both picked the Eagles over GB. Kurt Warner did as well. Everyone predicted a great game though. Billick called it a game worthy of an NFC Championship.
quote:
Originally posted by trump:
...According to 670-Score radio this evening, the Bears played vanilla offense so as not to show anything new...



There's been many posts about the Bears (as one example) not 'showing' this and that, supposedly saving all their bells and whistles for the upcoming playoffs.
Wouldn't the same apply to the Packers as well?
quote:
Originally posted by Satori:
Did Baldy also mention that the Packers practice field is covered with the exact same turf ?


Wait. Matthews, Hawk and Bishop really struggle with faster turf.

BTW, I know it's a surprise but the Packers offense is a finesse offense. Only the Eagles can benefit from that surface.
The Eagles arent as fast as the Bears, and they blitz so much more than the Bears, who rely heavily on that Cover 2. We should have chances against their D in single coverage.

I am so glad the Packers went to the 3-4. It's like night and day. I think the 4-3 is going out.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×