quote:Originally posted by packfanincolorado:
TT better be calling around for a trade for a back up qb.
10 4
10 4
10 4
haha anyone see Matthews with the ball boy?
I agree, I think OL depth has to be our biggest worry by a longshot.
Do we need to worry about Newhouse too? Couldn't watch the game but read some reactions.
that's a hard throw for coleman to make...could he have run there?
quote:Originally posted by titmfatied:
that's a hard throw for coleman to make...vould he have run there?
You German?
quote:Originally posted by titmfatied:
haha anyone see Matthews with the ball boy?
It's best we not know.
Trust me on that.
quote:Originally posted by Cavetoad:
I agree, I think OL depth has to be our biggest worry by a longshot.
Agreed. O line depth looks terrible. But if AR goes down there is nothing there.
guessing AJ Hawk doesnt make that play.
Latt must be pretty popular with his teammates.
Latt must be pretty popular with his teammates.
I've got sausage fingers (damn your quick)quote:Originally posted by Blair Kiel:quote:Originally posted by titmfatied:
that's a hard throw for coleman to make...vould he have run there?
You German?
Like I said in the chat room. Imagine Harrell working with #1 line and Ced carrying the load. He'll miss a few receivers, but it could work. The #2 OL sucks.
quote:Originally posted by Iowacheese:
guessing AJ Hawk doesnt make that play.
Latt must be pretty popular with his teammates.
I didn't notice AJ celebrating...
quote:Originally posted by Green Crustacean:
Like I said in the chat room. Imagine Harrell working with #1 line and Ced carrying the load. He'll miss a few receivers, but it could work. The #2 OL sucks.
Ced would have 40 carries per game and Harrell would still complete 50% of his passes. He's not good.
quote:Originally posted by macdaddy:quote:Originally posted by Cavetoad:
I agree, I think OL depth has to be our biggest worry by a longshot.
Agreed. O line depth looks terrible. But if AR goes down there is nothing there.
With as little time as GH has had, its really too hard to say, with top flight talant he may be able to be service-able.
But it gebbins with the OL and we could barely afford to lose 1 guy at this point. I sure hope to hell that Sherrod comes back soon, but the silence frightens me much.
quote:Originally posted by titmfatied:
I think the Packers are ok with harrell,.
quote:Originally posted by Cavetoad:
I agree, I think OL depth has to be our biggest worry by a longshot.
Harrell looks like hell but this is a bigger issue. Harrell will look better behind a starting oline. Let's hope none of those guys get hurt.
Hear ya toad. Completely agree.
Regarding #2 QB, I'm going to look at tape of Harrell from game 1 to game 3 again. I think he has progressed during that span. I agree with whomever said the Pack was rolling the dice at #2 QB this year. I think he's improving. I don't know if he's ready yet. MM certainly knows whether he has a player or not, doesn't he?
Regarding #2 QB, I'm going to look at tape of Harrell from game 1 to game 3 again. I think he has progressed during that span. I agree with whomever said the Pack was rolling the dice at #2 QB this year. I think he's improving. I don't know if he's ready yet. MM certainly knows whether he has a player or not, doesn't he?
by that I meant the Packers (MM and TT). It's near too late to do anything about it anyway.quote:Originally posted by PDXPackFan:
quote:Originally posted by titmfatied:
I think the Packers are ok with harrell,
Borisagrees with you.
quote:I've got sausage fingers (damn your quick)
Damn his quick what?
tried to edit my post from 'vould he have run there' to 'could he have run there'. Blair replied before I could tidy it up.
quote:Originally posted by justanotherpackerfan:
Eye sea what ewe did their.
FTFY
quote:TT better be calling around for a trade for a back up qb.
I seriously doubt this happens. Obtain and develop is the method. A guy fresh in off the street... it'd take him half the season to learn just the playbook. Pretty sure we'll stand pat with what we got.
Reading some of the MM quotes following the game it doesn't sound like he's going to do anything and Harrell is the backup QB for 2012.
and GH had this to deal with as well:
http://espnmilwaukee.com/commo...g&r=40&post_id=10331
quote:Crabtree’s injury hamstrung coach Mike McCarthy – and, in turn, backup quarterback Graham Harrell – when Taylor went out, leaving only Bostick at the position.
“Frankly, I don’t know if you people were aware of this, we had a lot of offense that went out the window in the second quarter (after Crabtree’s injury),” McCarthy said. “The offensive plan for the No. 2 group was minimized greatly by our tight end situation.”
Finley, meanwhile, was home in Green Bay spending time with his new son, Landon Dash.
“Jermichael came to me this morning, he got the phone call about his wife being in labor and so we got him the quickest flight that we could to get him home,” McCarthy said. “He’s where he should be right now.”
http://espnmilwaukee.com/commo...g&r=40&post_id=10331
quote:Originally posted by ammo:quote:Originally posted by titmfatied:
I think the Packers are ok with harrell,
Borisagrees with you.
This might be the first team in the history of the NFL to only roster 1 QB
We can use Cobb in the wildcat if the worst happens
Why sacrifice a roster spot for a guy that flat out can't play?
Imo the PACKER 2nd string OL has much poorer performance than most NFL teams,that said Harrell doesn't have much time to make a decision. His play is
substandard. The PACKER coach & staff have alot of time,money and effort invested in him. It would be difficult to admit at this point that they have wasted their efforts on him. I believe he'll be on the team after the final cut. If he still is struggling to play better after the last pre-season game I suspect the PACKERS will be scanning the waiver list for a vet QB.
substandard. The PACKER coach & staff have alot of time,money and effort invested in him. It would be difficult to admit at this point that they have wasted their efforts on him. I believe he'll be on the team after the final cut. If he still is struggling to play better after the last pre-season game I suspect the PACKERS will be scanning the waiver list for a vet QB.
From what I have seen of other teams this year, I think you can only say that the Packers 2nd string O-linemen have performed poorly. There are teams out there that can not field 5 quality O-Linemen.
I think many teams tried to fill the glamour positions and ignore the O-Line. Now they are paying for it. (Example Dallas)
and the jets
http://www.nationalfootballpos...de-for-a-tackle.html
I think many teams tried to fill the glamour positions and ignore the O-Line. Now they are paying for it. (Example Dallas)
and the jets
http://www.nationalfootballpos...de-for-a-tackle.html