Skip to main content

From the NYP.


ATLANTA — N.F.L. owners made thigh and knee pads mandatory for the 2013 season, although the players union could raise an objection in another indication of the fractured relationship between the two sides.

The league said it was “common sense” that the pads would make players safer from thigh contusions and knee bruises. Commissioner Roger Goodell said he was recently told by a Nike executive that N.B.A. players wear more padding below the waist than N.F.L. players.

“Some of us felt we were remiss that we took it out of the rule book — high school and college makes it mandatory — and in our mind that is how it should be and will be in 2013,” said the Atlanta Falcons president Rich McKay, the chairman of the competition committee.

The league made clear it believes it could apply the rule unilaterally as long as it gives the union the opportunity to review it. The league has discussed the addition of padding for years with union leadership and said it would talk to them again.


Players, particularly those at speed positions like receiver and cornerback, have long resisted wearing additional padding because they fear it will slow them down. But league officials said they want N.F.L. players to set the example for younger players, who already are required to wear knee and thigh pads. The one-year wait for the rule to be enacted is to allow equipment makers and players to work on refining equipment. The latest generation of equipment uses high-tech material and has pads built in to “girdles.”
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

It's ironic that the skill guys on O think a little padding slows them down... it's the same padding the skill guys on D have to wear. They're both slower.

Hopefully this will prevent some of those nagging knee and thigh bruises that inhibit guys. I guess if my livelihood depended on my legs, I'd make sure they were well protected no matter how it made me look. It didn't hurt Erik Dickerson's speed, and he often commented how he wore every pad he could.
This is beyond stupid in my opinion. If players want to not wear pads then they're taking the risk that they're going to get bruised thighs and knees and they all seem fine with that. Some wear pads, many don't. They're not making the game any safer, they're just pissing everyone off so they can keep up the appearance that they're working hard to make the game safer. It's not giving the appearance they're trying to protect the players though, it appears as if they're making arbitrary decisions based on ignorance.
if the players want a choice in the matter, then they also have to accept the consequences that come with that choice

So long as they sign a full waiver, stating that they freely made an informed choice to not wear the protective pads - then everybody should be fine.

And they also have to give up the right to sue the league about it ever again.

Choices have consequences, even for elite athletes
Maybe the players should sign a contract that they would give up any salary for games missed due to knee or thigh bruises that would not have happened or been lessened if wearing standard issue pads...

Yes, it may be an appearance of safety for appearance's sake, but I get tired of a guy being out two or three weeks with a bruise because they landed on a totally uncovered knee. Many players state that the only reason they don't wear them is because of looks, they know it protects them but they like the "sleek" look. Well, look dumpier, play safer.
quote:
Originally posted by Fandame:
Maybe the players should sign a contract that they would give up any salary for games missed due to knee or thigh bruises that would not have happened or been lessened if wearing standard issue pads...


This.
My initial thought when this became 'news' was this is a way for owners (teams)to reduce their costs related to injury and rehab, while still paying that player's salary.

It also remined me of an auto-repair company I used to work for way back when. One payday, everyone had their check affixed to a box. Inside the box were safety glasses, and a letter explaining that they had furnished EVERYBODY a new pair of these glasses, and from that day forward, they would not pay another worker's comp claim for debris in the eyes.
It made good sense from their standpoint, and I see a similar circumstance happening with this pad rule.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×