...sorry, if you feel this belongs in the other thread...but I think it warrants its own discussion.
I just listened to the crew on ESPN's Around the Horn. Then listened a few minutes to NFL talk on XM radio. I have to say, all these talking heads (OK most of these) are missing a huge point.
I agree it was not a face-mask penalty on Rodgers, after having seen the slow motion, close-up replay. But, I have to believe that 95% of the impartial people watching that play would have called it a face-mask in real time. And guess what, that is when the officials have to make the call.
There has to be a line somewhere. Do they really want every penalty reviewed? What's next after that, every penalty that is not called reviewed? We would be talking chaos of Biblical proportion.
You can't say the officials got it wrong, when every single aspect of the play, as it unfolds in real time, makes it appear that it was a face-mask. Maybe Rodgers pulled a fast one (more power to him if he did) or maybe it was just an amazing set of circumstances or maybe it was actually a face-mask. It doesn't matter, in live time, it looked like it and that is how you have to call it.
As a Badger fan, I just sat through the exact opposite with the non-catch in the Badger game. It looked like a catch, but was ruled to not be a catch. I understand Lion fans' anger, but it just can't be done any other way. I don't understand Viking fans anger, but it just doesn't matter.