Skip to main content

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.c...per-bowl-week/1.html

If Bob McGinn's high on the future of these Packers, then we all should be.

There is no local beat man I respect more than Bob McGinn of the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel. He never falls in love with the Packers when the rest of the world does, and he's always suitably skeptical about the locals. Wish I could think of a few examples, but I'm always impressed with a local beat person who can be exhaustively good and thorough -- two traits McGinn shows consistently -- while resisting the temptation, even in the best of times, to pump up the team. But when he likes something, he won't hesitate to write it. And I don't recall him ever being as high on a Packers team as he is now, and I mean high about the long-term future.

A few excerpts from a column he wrote for the Journal-Sentinel over the weekend:

"One of the most annoying remarks in sports is when a coach or a player for some down-in-the-mouth team says his goal is to win championships. If any player, coach or scout for the current Packers failed to use the plural case to state his objective, he would be guilty of grossly underselling the capability of what has been built in Green Bay or not telling the truth. I'm spending my first non-football weekend in what seems like forever trying to make sense of a team whose future appears brighter than at any time since the Lombardi era. Get ready, Wisconsin. You ain't seen nothing yet. Think about the 68 players (69 with Johnny Jolly) under contract to the Packers. Consider the coaching, the personnel department, management, financial resources, facilities and fan support. In all areas, Green Bay basically is as good as it gets right now ...

"Look at the overwhelming strengths of this team. The only thing that can stop [quarterback Aaron] Rodgers would be concussions or major injury. Jermichael Finley, 23, will be back wanting his piece of the action, and coupled with three ace wideouts in their mid-20s and perhaps venerable Donald Driver the Packers will have almost an embarrassment of receiving riches.

"Bryan Bulaga, just 21, didn't play a terrible game all season and should do nothing but get better. Josh Sitton, 24, is a robust, high-caliber guard. Center Scott Wells does the job, too. The 24-year-old [Clay] Matthews played hurt most of the year yet still was exceptional. Desmond Bishop is entrenched inside, but either Nick Barnett or A.J. Hawk will have to go because neither deserves to sit and neither has the height or weight to play right outside in a 3-4. Tramon Williams ... played at a Pro Bowl level, and Sam Shields is able to outrun many of his mistakes and improve dramatically as the nickel back. Nick Collins plays safety as well as anyone in the NFC. Nick Barnett will return. Old pro Charles Woodson will fit somewhere. Tim Masthay has a chance to become the Packers' best punter since Craig Hentrich ...

"They will average 26.2 years per man and 27.4 years per starter on Super Sunday ... Unless Thompson should retire prematurely, the Packers should have him finding the players, Mike McCarthy coaching them and Rodgers leading a formidable roster for years to come. Late last February, a personnel man for one of the four playoff semifinalists walked up to Thompson and told him that after careful study he had evaluated the Packers as the best team in the 2009 playoff field. Arizona and Kurt Warner extinguished the Packers' chances 12 months ago. The worthy Steelers could do the same thing next Sunday. No matter what happens, the Packers will not be going away ...

"So think Super Bowls, and think championships ... Nothing should be beyond the realm of possibility for what the Packers have assembled.''
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by OSUpackerbacker:
Steeler may have to deal with their own "photogate" as PK has revealed that Goodell is quoted as saying not one single steeler spokin in defense of the rapist when he was conducting his investigation earlier this year.


yes...I had heard that, too.....my gosh...why would the commish talk about that NOW??

why now?

hmmmmm......I just don't get it.....

telling that none of his teammates supported him....what did Roth have to say about that in reply?
SDPF, I think that was something Peter King only revealed now. He's been following Goodell all year for an article and had been sitting on it. I'd think Ben is going to be put through the wringer tomorrow over his sexual assault as he should be. The media is going to have a field day tomorrow poking and prodding all the Steelers players to find out which guys talked to Goodell.
quote:
Originally posted by OSUpackerbacker:
Steeler may have to deal with their own "photogate" as PK has revealed that Goodell is quoted as saying not one single steeler spokin in defense of the rapist when he was conducting his investigation earlier this year.


Goodell corrected this overnight. It was not only Steelers he talked with but NFL players, so it looks like some players from other teams were included. He did not specify how many were Steelers.
thats not how it sounded when King was giving his version, sounded like it was specifically about Pitt players, but I digress on anything about Goodell ...

BTW, last summer still not sure why the visit and interview to Green Bay and a talk with the Green Bay fans that day on NFL Network, did Goodell do that all over the league and the fans of each team got to answer questions to Goodell?

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×