Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Bears are beatable.  So are the Rams.  We had the Rams beat.  We beat the Bears!

That is what is so frustrating about this season.  Watching the offense sustain drives against Atlanta, actually functioning like a unit and not a herky-jerky mess, kind of crystallized it.  This team should not be where they are right now.

There's 3 culprits, each bigger than the last: 1) That brain-dead ref in the opener; 2) Montgomery's bone-headed decision to throw the game away in LA, and 3) Mike McCarthy's offense grinding to a season-ending halt after the opening drive in Minneacrapnpiss. 

Turns out people blaming the rookie receivers for the offense becoming dysfunctional were dead solid wrong.  

I really doesn't matter what happened in WK1.  CHI and GB are currently two very different teams.  I hate to say it but the bears have a legitimate shot.  Pretty remarkable for a first year HC.  We can only hope 1265 can replicate that quick a turnaround.  

Rams and Bears are identical with the exception one is good on defense (wins championships) and the other offense.  Not that the Rams don't have a solid defense.  

Shitty teams for years on end collecting high 1st rounders and finally find a coach to put it together, at least for a year or two.  Bears defense will take them pretty far.

He's also surrounded by a lot of talent.

I think the LAR O is better than CHI.  Better QB, OL, RB.  They also have a lot of talent on D but aren't nearly as successful at CHI.  

Should come down to NO v CHI.  Take their uni's away and I'd pull for CHI.  Hard not to root for a D that can do what they're doing in this age of scoring.  Trubisky and Mack have to stay healthy. 

DH13 posted:

He's also surrounded by a lot of talent.

I think the LAR O is better than CHI.  Better QB, OL, RB.  They also have a lot of talent on D but aren't nearly as successful at CHI.  

Should come down to NO v CHI.  Take their uni's away and I'd pull for CHI.  Hard not to root for a D that can do what they're doing in this age of scoring.  Trubisky and Mack have to stay healthy. 

Yeah, have to admit seeing those defenses shutting it down was refreshing.  

DH13 posted:

I really doesn't matter what happened in WK1.  CHI and GB are currently two very different teams.  I hate to say it but the bears have a legitimate shot.  Pretty remarkable for a first year HC.  We can only hope 1265 can replicate that quick a turnaround.  

Disagree. These are essentially the same 2 rosters, minus some dead weight on our side.

Packers are actually better from Week 1.  Kiser won’t be lobbing pick 6 screen passes to linemen, for one thing.  I’m also thinking Philbin can put together a game plan that does NOT involve a heavy dose of slow-developing, “everybody go deep” 7-step dropbacks for Kahlil Mack to feast on.

Buck up DH13, it’s still Bears-Packers.  **** the Bears.  Slurp them when they actually go somewhere in the post-season.

Rams offense had like 93 yards into the 3rd quarter. The boy genius didn't look so smart against the Bears defense. Rams scored 6 points ??? That's impressive.

If the Bears had a good QB they would be lethal. Man, he threw some stink balls last night. 

Last edited by Packdog
Pistol GB posted:
DH13 posted:

I really doesn't matter what happened in WK1.  CHI and GB are currently two very different teams.  I hate to say it but the bears have a legitimate shot.  Pretty remarkable for a first year HC.  We can only hope 1265 can replicate that quick a turnaround.  

Disagree. These are essentially the same 2 rosters, minus some dead weight on our side.

Packers are actually better from Week 1.  Kiser won’t be lobbing pick 6 screen passes to linemen, for one thing.  I’m also thinking Philbin can put together a game plan that does NOT involve a heavy dose of slow-developing, “everybody go deep” 7-step dropbacks for Kahlil Mack to feast on.

Buck up DH13, it’s still Bears-Packers.  **** the Bears.  Slurp them when they actually go somewhere in the post-season.

You're stoned.  Packers can win, any given Sunday and all, but if you think the Bears playing together for several games gelling under the new system aren't better then that's your delusion.  Add in the shit ton of injuries and absolute garbage right side of the OL, which is actually worse than week 1 if that's possible, and a dinked up Bak.  Rodgers is working on his yips too.  

All the Bears need to do is run the ball effectively.  No Daniels, no Wilkerson, huge difference.

Last edited by Henry

Pretty much.  The one point I will agree with is CHI hasn't done anything yet but look good in the regular season.  I wouldn't have as much reservation about CHI because of their D as I would about LAR and KC in the post season.  As we saw last night it only takes one really good D to stop one of these high wire offenses.  CHI's challenge is still on O.  They have some really nice parts and Trubisky is up and down but they only scored 15 vs a less than shutdown LAR D.  That after 4 picks.

Yes Henry that is all they need to do is run the football. It’s also pretty much all they can do.

Coming off their biggest game of the year, hopefully heavily favored and riding high. I like our chances.

I’m not saying the Packers are better. I’m saying **** the Bears. **** them today, tomorrow and yesterday. 

 

Last edited by Pistol GB

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×