Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I'd be very happy to win 1 of the 2. 

The best development of the series so far hasn't been talked about much. It's how calm and collected Bledsoe was in Game 2. He had a terrible game 1 and then opened up game 2 with a really bad turnover. I thought "here we go again with him and the Celtics", but he stayed calm and collected and just took care of business. He's grown up a lot under Bud. 

Odd number games. They are everything in a series expected to be closely contested. Boston has game 1. Bucks HAVE to take back game 3. They really have to. Game 3 is their season. 

ChilliJon posted:

Odd number games. They are everything in a series expected to be closely contested. Boston has game 1. Bucks HAVE to take back game 3. They really have to. Game 3 is their season. 

I disagree. I think they HAVE to win either Game 3 or Game 4. Losing both makes it about 90% that they lose the Series in Boston in Game 6. 

I would say that if the Bucks win Game 3 the Celtics may fold. If you can get the "Kyrie's gone to New York" dynamic going, the Celtics could go into one of the spirals they went into during the year. 

If you want to win the series....win game 3 - not 100% necessary but must win one of the next 2 at a minimum. 

If Boston goes down 2-1 -- they're going to start panicking. 

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×