Replies sorted oldest to newest
IB4T
So now Gunt is taking credit for Rodgers' decisions?
Gutekunst is gonna Gutekunst.
And, Henry is gonna Henry.
Suck is a bad word?
The lack of comment from Henry is disturbing. He's preparing to piss in our cereal big time.
Steely-eyed assassin.
@Pakrz posted:Suck is a bad word?
Not in my house
I'm devastated.
I think they forgot to mention Gunt trying to get rid of the one guy that's the entire reason he'd even be considered executive of the year.
Whoopsie!
Why don't you and the other traitor go play some rub and tug with a generous slathering of apple flavored horse paste.
But keep those "packerhistory.com" articles coming.
@Henry posted:I think they forgot to mention Gunt trying to get rid of the one guy that's the entire reason he'd even be considered executive of the year.
If Gutekunst wanted to get rid of Rodgers, Rodgers would've been gone.
If Rodgers hated the FO and wanted out, he'd be out.
It's. That. Simple.
prefaced?
Foreplay
@H5 posted:If Gutekunst wanted to get rid of Rodgers, Rodgers would've been gone.
If Rodgers hated the FO and wanted out, he'd be out.
It's. That. Simple.
You're wrong. It's never that simple and thinking otherwise is rather simple.
"Oh no! Our star QB that makes us lots of money and makes us look good thinks we're doodyheads. We should let him go".
Money and clout. There is nothing simple or logical about it.
See: American "capitalism"