Skip to main content

lovepack posted:

Seattle's starters played a lot this preseason. MM doesn't think that's important. Our guys barely had a handful of reps together. I worry the Hawks could catch the Pack in their "pre-November" malaise that is so typical of MM teams. Hope we come out firing. But this could be a sloppy loss. Then, 0-2 is really looking us in the face.

Ideally, your next post could lay out the path to 0-16?  not too much to ask I hope.

lovepack posted:

Seattle's starters played a lot this preseason. MM doesn't think that's important. Our guys barely had a handful of reps together. I worry the Hawks could catch the Pack in their "pre-November" malaise that is so typical of MM teams. Hope we come out firing. But this could be a sloppy loss. Then, 0-2 is really looking us in the face.

Glass half-empty as per usual.

Thank-god you're not my hurricane evacuation companion....."We're all gonna die!!!!!!!"  

pablopackerfan posted:
lovepack posted:

Seattle's starters played a lot this preseason. MM doesn't think that's important. Our guys barely had a handful of reps together. I worry the Hawks could catch the Pack in their "pre-November" malaise that is so typical of MM teams. Hope we come out firing. But this could be a sloppy loss. Then, 0-2 is really looking us in the face.

Ideally, your next post could lay out the path to 0-16?  not too much to ask I hope.

Hello Pot? There's a kettle on line one. They say it's regarding black and that you should definitely take the call. 

The Heckler posted:

I also think the best way to attack the Hags D is to spread them out.  As Chilijon said, I don't think there is going to be many rushing yards going at their DL.  Their D needs to be spread out and when passing the ball get the short passing game going (which really is a running game) to keep the DL off of AR.  This in turn might get a little room to run the ball.  I don't see a ton of points for the Pack against that D but I don't see a ton of points for Seattle either.  I just am not that impressed with their offense especially the OL.

Anyhow, the first two games (Seattle and @Atlanta) are so important since the Packers cant afford a slow start.

Yup..  high probability that we are competing against those two teams for home field advantage.  

lovepack posted:

Hey all I'm saying is this is a very tough two games to open the season, and we can't afford to come out flat in week one. MM didn't see fit to play the starters much at all, and Seattle played a ton. That's all I'm saying.

week 3 and 4 is tough too. I can't see how we're not 0-4 since MM didn't see fit to risk his starters (much at all) 

ChilliJon posted:
pablopackerfan posted:
lovepack posted:

Seattle's starters played a lot this preseason. MM doesn't think that's important. Our guys barely had a handful of reps together. I worry the Hawks could catch the Pack in their "pre-November" malaise that is so typical of MM teams. Hope we come out firing. But this could be a sloppy loss. Then, 0-2 is really looking us in the face.

Ideally, your next post could lay out the path to 0-16?  not too much to ask I hope.

Hello Pot? There's a kettle on line one. They say it's regarding black and that you should definitely take the call. 

wtf are you talking about?  

lovepack posted:

MM didn't see fit to play the starters much at all, and Seattle played a ton. That's all I'm saying.

This is true.  Personally I am grateful MM did it that way.  There is nothing worse than a season-ending injury in pre-season.  

The risk on offense is, the timing may be off between the blockers and the RB's, and between the QB and the WR's.  Overall though it's worth the risk.  We have Aaron Rodgers:  He can find an open TE in his sleep.  I expect a big game from Bennett.

On defense, ALL of the starters are healthy.  How often do we get to say that?  

Pack - 26  , Chickenhawks - 20

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×