OMG
Why didn't Russ just run it in one of these plays??
Wow, how do you not call a penalty on that?????
Defensive holding
Jesus this is close.
I think he's in.
Great. Packers miss the #1 seed by three inches.
What a finish
MichiganPacker2 posted:I think he's in.
No he's not.
Who does New York want to win? That's basically what this is.
Inches short.
lambeausouth posted:MichiganPacker2 posted:I think he's in.
No he's not.
I think you're right. You can't overturn that.
Explain to me how the NFL didn't review the prior play for obvious holding? Clear who the NFL wants as the #1 seed.
Because you can’t review holding penalties
He's not in. But they clearly missed the DPI/Holding on the previous play.
The interference call on 3rd down was awful. If you are not going to review that, why even have review.
Thanks for nothing, Seattle.
At least we get to see Saints kill the Suckqueens next weekend.
Kudos to the LB for stopping that play. Shades of the Rams/Titans SB years ago.
Short.
The Delay of Game penalty killed it... Lynch would've gotten that TD.
Blake Martinez woulda stopped him too.
I hope MN wins, but they won't. I would rather get the Eagles or Seahawks at Lambeau than the Saints.
#2 seed it is!
New Orleans... see you in 2 weeks! Pack your long johns.
Do you think Martinez sticks that tackle? Lol.
MichiganPacker2 posted:The interference call on 3rd down was awful. If you are not going to review that, why even have review.
Tomorrow morning, from the League office:
"We should have reviewed the second to last Seattle play. Our bad."
Sure seems like a lot of games are being decided by the refs. Stevie Wonder would have known to review that play. Somehow, the refs on the field, and the booth...they just must have all gone for coffee, or something.
Every scoring play is reviewed. Many of which don't need it. But when a critical play happens, and there's clear pass interference, and a whole season's worth of hard work hangs in the balance on the league not having their heads up their asses, "whoops, we're sorry. We'll get it right next time."
And the Saints fans BAWL!!
YooperPackfan posted:Because you can’t review holding penalties
Booth review.
Saints @ Lambeau, then hopefully GB @ SF. Never would've thought the Pack would be 13-3 this year following two 1980s seasons from hell, so even though the road looks difficult at best, I'll friggin take it.
The delay of game killer them, had Beast Mode in for the kill shot.
Great game. Seattle looked overmatched at times but gotta give them props....they never quit.
too bad on the obvious penalty on the 9ers....blown call or NFL preference ?
MichiganPacker2 posted:The interference call on 3rd down was awful. If you are not going to review that, why even have review.
Don't think it could be PI. There's was holding before the pass was thrown, and holding isn't reviewable.
Holding penalties aren't reviewed but the DPI should have been.
There was holding on the play by the defender, not PI. So it's not reviewable.
lambeausouth posted:Great. Packers miss the #1 seed by three inches.
Full disclosure.....I was rooting for the Niners.
To be the man.....you gotta beat the man!!
I'm hopeful the Pack & SF both win in 2 weeks!
YES, I want this Damn Packer team to have to go back to SF & win. If I have to die a decade sooner thanks to the Packer/Lion game - I want those green & gold a-holes to go back into SF. Get your ass back there until you win! Assholes!!
Next year (2020) regular season -- Packers have to play in SF. AGAIN!
bvan posted:YooperPackfan posted:Because you can’t review holding penalties
Booth review.
They still can’t review holding penalties, booth or coach
michiganjoe posted:Holding penalties aren't reviewed but the DPI should have been.
It was both. He held him both before the ball was thrown and while the ball was in the air.
BrainDed posted:Do you think Martinez sticks that tackle? Lol.
Without a doubt....about 2 yards deep in the EZ
When the ball is in the air the hold becomes a PI
MichiganPacker2 posted:michiganjoe posted:Holding penalties aren't reviewed but the DPI should have been.
It was both. He held him both before the ball was thrown and while the ball was in the air.
But you can't have both on the same play, not in that scenario anyway. Once the defender held the receiver before the ball was thrown, it's holding. Not PI. Not reviewable.