Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

No.  And in general, while I do not consider making comments or behaving in ways that are negative about someone's ethnic heritage, skin color, sexual preference or whatever to be acceptable, I'm sick and tired of the excessive political correctness that is running amok in this country.  In the case of the Redskins, I'm certain that the name did not originate out of an intent to somehow degrade native Americans (i.e. indians), so ENOUGH ALREADY!  As much as I dislike Daniel Snyder, leave them alone about their name!

Only after the Fighting Irish get rid of their drunken little Irish guy looking for a fight as a mascot. 

 

Of the two, what one is more offensive and why?  A - The balding irish guy too drunk to put his hat on straight and trying to fight.   B - The Native american with overly red skin who appears to be deep in though.

It's not like we are talking about the CLE Indian's here. 

http://www.herbfm.com/uploads/9/5/1/1/9511736/6022208.png

Last edited by BrainDed

"I'm certain that the name did not originate out of an intent to somehow degrade native Americans (i.e. indians),"

Certain?

 

"Redskin" is neither descriptive nor complimentary. If meant to pay tribute to the fierce , brave and relentless abo fighters, there are several commonly used names that match well with the logo (which is among my favorites). As it stands, it says the only remarkable feature of pre-Columbian Americans is their complexion.

 

Given the makeup of the NFL, another name suggests itself.

"Nigger" is, after all, only a regional corruption of a clinical term for the most common pre-colonial phenotype found in sub-Saharan Africa. A term which derives from Latin for "black".

 

IMO, It's a term that would still be in common usage were black Americans only 1% of the population, like the aboriginals.

 

The absurdity of this idea shows the absurdity of clinging to "Redskins" because of tradition.

 

Originally Posted by Stevie:

No.  And in general, while I do not consider making comments or behaving in ways that are negative about someone's ethnic heritage, skin color, sexual preference or whatever to be acceptable, I'm sick and tired of the excessive political correctness that is running amok in this country.  In the case of the Redskins, I'm certain that the name did not originate out of an intent to somehow degrade native Americans (i.e. indians), so ENOUGH ALREADY!  As much as I dislike Daniel Snyder, leave them alone about their name!

 

The Al contingent has spoken.  

 

Can't we all just get back to religious white dullards laying out the truth of things? 

 

 

I'm good with, "Chiefs", "Braves" and "Indians"...

 

"Redskins" is, um, kind of pretty offensive.

 

I'm torn, however, because the loudest support for change seems to come from feel-good, guilty-for-being-white-folk.

 

Florida State bought off the Seminole Nation------maybe Danny can do the same. Perhaps buy the Indians some fire water?

Originally Posted by Blair Kiel:

I'm good with, "Chiefs", "Braves" and "Indians"...

 

"Redskins" is, um, kind of pretty offensive.

 

I'm torn, however, because the loudest support for change seems to come from feel-good, guilty-for-being-white-folk.

 

Florida State bought off the Seminole Nation------maybe Danny can do the same. Perhaps buy the Indians some fire water?

 

That's what the Oneida nation thinks too.  Silly red niggers.

Originally Posted by ChilliJon:

Washington Apache's? It keeps the theme in place. It's not specifically stereotypical AND it's a US militarily funded death machine. Everyone wins except Cowboy fans in Afghanistan.

I like the concept, but I'd just go with Washington Drunks With Junked Cars Piled Up In The Front Yard.  That's slightly less racist than Redskins.  And it's catchy.  Win-win.

Originally Posted by grignon:

"I'm certain that the name did not originate out of an intent to somehow degrade native Americans (i.e. indians),"

Certain?

 

"Redskin" is neither descriptive nor complimentary. If meant to pay tribute to the fierce , brave and relentless abo fighters, there are several commonly used names that match well with the logo (which is among my favorites). As it stands, it says the only remarkable feature of pre-Columbian Americans is their complexion.

 

Given the makeup of the NFL, another name suggests itself.

"Nigger" is, after all, only a regional corruption of a clinical term for the most common pre-colonial phenotype found in sub-Saharan Africa. A term which derives from Latin for "black".

 

IMO, It's a term that would still be in common usage were black Americans only 1% of the population, like the aboriginals.

 

The absurdity of this idea shows the absurdity of clinging to "Redskins" because of tradition.

 

I think you need to quit making crap up and actually look up the real and original meaning of the word "nigger".

a small hint, it has nothing to do with color.

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×