@Fedya posted:Joe Barry and MLF let him do it. I had nothing to do with it.
God punished us because you were playing with yourself during the game. You share blame with Joe Barry.😊
How would you like to be a kicker with a week to think about that?
@Maxi54 posted:I have to give Purdy some credit. He had a terrible day but stayed poised and did what he had to do to give them a chance to win the game. Can't control a FG Kicker screwing up in crunch time.
Didn't hurt that CLE forgot how to tackle on that drive. Glad SF took the L though.
@Goalline posted:Timmy, do you want them to make Sunday Ticket available to all the cable services?
Wouldn't make any difference to me.
Actually, Sunday Ticket is just like cable in that you still have to buy the package, whether you use all of it or not.
There may be anywhere from 4-6 games every season that would be network broadcasts, thus no need for the Ticket. But you are still paying for it, and that just doesn't seem to be a good value.
A $99 buy-in would be a much better deal and worthy of consideration.
My preference would be to have it as a PPV event. That way, you will only pay for what you actually use. But it would still have to be priced for value. IOW, I'm a buyer at $9.99--maybe even $19.99.
At $39.95 or more, it's a pirate stream for me.
@Fedya posted:That's an oddly specific fetish you have.
Trying to join the 7th Day Adventists.😂
@Timmy! posted:Wouldn't make any difference to me.
Actually, Sunday Ticket is just like cable in that you still have to buy the package, whether you use all of it or not.
There may be anywhere from 4-6 games every season that would be network broadcasts, thus no need for the Ticket. But you are still paying for it, and that just doesn't seem to be a good value.
A $99 buy-in would be a much better deal and worthy of consideration.
My preference would be to have it as a PPV event. That way, you will only pay for what you actually use. But it would still have to be priced for value. IOW, I'm a buyer at $9.99--maybe even $19.99.
At $39.95 or more, it's a pirate stream for me.
100% agreed! Living in Wisconsin and being a Prime member I get every Packer game anyway, and other NFL games I can take it or leave it. At 10 bucks a game I would rent at least one game every week.
Jeebus! Refs gift a TD to the Eagles
I've never liked Carroll ever since his cheating BS at USC. Especially the way he cut and ran from that entire situation. Everything about him is slimy as hell. His antics just solidify that he has one of the most punchable faces in all of football. 😄
@ammo posted:Isn't Carroll like 80 years old?
He looks like he’s 32. Man is in amazing shape.
@Timmy! posted:A $99 buy-in would be a much better deal and worthy of consideration.
Something like $99 for 17 games of your choice (one game a week) or if you don't choose a game to watch it rolls over and you can watch (2) games in a week of your choice.
I'll bet they'd have triple the amount of subscriptions if they did it something like this. Pay per use.
I would pay for it at 150 bucks.
200 bucks if I didn’t have to add a cable service like YTTV.
I love how you guys are negotiating into a black hole. Press 1 to speak with an agent. 😀
Sheesh.....just spit balling. It's a suggestion not a negotiation.
Back to football....
Tyreek Hill can expect his letter from the league office.
TYREEK HILL. HUGE TOUCHDOWN.
— NFL (@NFL) October 15, 2023
📺: #CARvsMIA on CBS
📱: Stream on #NFLPlus https://t.co/B4mQvLOt8O pic.twitter.com/Uis2fkF3el
Garrett Wilson is the real deal. It would have been interesting watching the connection between him and AR this season.
Lazard lowered the boom on that block.
And got called for it. Lazard went in from his front.
@Blair Kiel posted:I love how you guys are negotiating into a black hole. Press 1 to speak with an agent. 😀
It helps to be prepared for the real thing, should any of our services be requested.
You prepare by training, training may include 'role play'...
Attachments
I'm not quite convinced that the Lions are ready for the big show yet, but they could make some noise in the playoffs this year. After sooooo many years of sucking hind teat they finally have a formidable team.
I'm most surprised by how well their D is playing after showing improvement last year.
This Lions team is similar to the Rams team that Goff was with in the Super Bowl. The defense isn't quite as good, but the RBs are better (if healthy).
@Maxi54 posted:I'm not quite convinced that the Lions are ready for the big show yet, but they could make some noise in the playoffs this year. After sooooo many years of sucking hind teat they finally have a formidable team.
I'm most surprised by how well their D is playing after showing improvement last year.
Totally agree with you. I knew the Lions were going to be good this year but they’re even better than I thought they would be. Jared Goff looks like he’s found the fountain of youth after a huge backslide in his career after that Super Bowl loss when he was with the Rams.
I think the Lion coaches understand that the key with Goff is don't put him into positions where he feels he has to play hero ball. Keep him comfortable in favorable situations and he can be pretty effective.
I'm not ready for it, and don't like the idea of the Packers having to look up at anybody in the weak Central Division, but if forced to make a choice, I'd rather it be the Lions than the $***head Bares or Queens.
Makes me nauseous even having to say that...
lol Jalen Hurts 3 picks today
Jets now lead, 20-14 with 1:46 left
Jets SHOULD NOT have scored a TD!
@Maxi54 posted:I'm not quite convinced that the Lions are ready for the big show yet, but they could make some noise in the playoffs this year. After sooooo many years of sucking hind teat they finally have a formidable team.
I'm most surprised by how well their D is playing after showing improvement last year.
I was thinking that I may have to admit the Loins are better than I want to give them credit for.
Or it may be that I have become conditioned to them sucking, and can't picture them as among the 'elite' teams.
Yet I still think they aren't that good, but they are good enough. They're having a lot of success in the middle of the field, creating 2nd/3rd-and-short situations they can easily convert.
That in turn creates the chance at the occasional big play downfield, but they are more lucky than good on those plays.
Agree. No proof that their short term success is sustainable yet, but they look like they're on the right track to me.
LaPorta was a big addition to their O. He's having a pretty good year so far for a rookie TE.
The entire league is lucky Rodgers got hurt.
@Blair Kiel posted:Jets SHOULD NOT have scored a TD!
If you watch the play, the Eagles let him score
@Maxi54 posted:I'm not ready for it, and don't like the idea of the Packers having to look up at anybody in the weak Central Division, but if forced to make a choice, I'd rather it be the Lions than the $***head Bares or Queens.
Makes me nauseous even having to say that...
It'll be easy to root for DET if they come up against a SF or Philly. They're a solid, well coached football team. Much sooner them than Bares or Queens, definitely.
I'm glad for Wilson.
He was getting more than his fair share of sh*t thrown at him from fans and media. He still may not be influencing the outcome of these games to a significant degree, but at least it quietens some of the media ass clowns.