Skip to main content

Goldie posted:

Reporter on the sideline was just saying Ha Ha Clinton Dix took less money to get on a “fun” team.    Really?  Green Bay wasn’t fun?  

I believe the reference was to the Redskins.  As little fun as 3-1 is, 0-4 is probably worse.

Tavis Smiley posted:

Let’s be honest, it would be swell to have a back-up able to do what Daniels is doing if our starting QB went out.

I hope we don't have to find out what our back up QBs can do.

On the KFAN pregame, the guys made the point that whoever loses the Bears Vikings game would be last in the division, but that if the Vikings win they have to be considered the favorites to win the division.  Uhh, what?

Tavis Smiley posted:

Let’s be honest, it would be swell to have a back-up able to do what Daniels is doing if our starting QB went out.

Let’s be really honest. Daniels might be the better starting QB. 

ChilliJon posted:
Tavis Smiley posted:

Let’s be honest, it would be swell to have a back-up able to do what Daniels is doing if our starting QB went out.

Let’s be really honest. Daniels might be the better starting QB. 

Let’s be honest, you’re correct.

mrtundra posted:
Tavis Smiley posted:

Let’s be honest, it would be swell to have a back-up able to do what Daniels is doing if our starting QB went out.

I hope we don't have to find out what our back up QBs can do.

If that back up tackle (Light) needs to play that may indeed happen.

Tavis Smiley posted:
ChilliJon posted:
Tavis Smiley posted:

Let’s be honest, it would be swell to have a back-up able to do what Daniels is doing if our starting QB went out.

Let’s be really honest. Daniels might be the better starting QB. 

Let’s be honest, you’re correct.

If all this means Daniels is better than Cousint's, then, honestly, I agree with that.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×