Timmy! posted:I hate to say it, but will anyway:
Chase Daniels showed exactly what Hundley should've done for us last year.
Not just Daniels but a HC/OC that can put together a game plan that will work for the backup QB. We have a guy that thinks his offense works if you plug any QB into it.
michiganjoe posted:Stafford doing Stafford things.
Stafford and Cousins--separated at birth??
Stafford has more talent but they are pretty equal in important games.
Vegas was off 4.5 points *COMBINED* in all three games yesterday. pic.twitter.com/spLqcm2HID
— John Ekdahl (@JohnEkdahl) November 23, 2018
Was nice to see Ha Ha impact the game. Redskin fans got to see what he brings, athletic guy who plays like he's going through the motions. Game changing poor angle and missed tackle.
4th rounder looks like robbery right now.
Haha sure looks like he's lost all interest in things football. Can't see how ANYONE will give him a decent contract offer next year.
Letting Micah Hyde and Casey Hayward go was very upsetting - after the fact, seeing their success. How could GB be so wrong about these players?
Seeing Ha Ha and Damarious Randall gone - now I have a whole lot more confidence in the personnel decision making.
Micah Hyde and Taysom Hill compete in the X4 man love competition.
PackerHawk posted:Timmy! posted:I hate to say it, but will anyway:
Chase Daniels showed exactly what Hundley should've done for us last year.Not just Daniels but a HC/OC that can put together a game plan that will work for the backup QB. We have a guy that thinks his offense works if you plug any QB into it.
It did with Flynn, but that was in 2011 with Nelson, Jennings, Jones, Cobb, and Finley in their primes.
Why couldn't our brain trust see the talents of Hill?
For the same reason they don't seem to see the talents of Jones?
I was trying to be positive about the direction of our personnel decisions. We let two guys go, then they go on to become pro-bowlers. Bummer.
Now we trade two guys, and it is like addition by subtraction. Things are looking up!
Aaron Jones may be under-utilized, but at least he is still a Packer, right?!
I'll be more positive if they can McCarthy.
bvan posted:Why couldn't our brain trust see the talents of Hill?
That would require being able to come up with ideas on how to use said talent that's different from standard expectations.
Herschel posted:bvan posted:Why couldn't our brain trust see the talents of Hill?
That would require being able to come up with ideas on how to use said talent that's different from standard expectations.
Taysom Hill is a decent player, but he's a backup role player. Yes, they should have kept him instead of a useless Joe Callahan who they didn't even trust to play instead of Brett Hundley last year. But Taysom Hill looks good because the defense has to defend about 4 other weapons before him.
There are 5 Taysom Hills on every roster.
If you watch Saints games Taysom Hill is actually taking plays away from guys like Kamara. The Saints are easier to defend when Taysom Hill is playing QB.
Hill has 174 yds rushing and 65 yds passing this year. And he gets a shit load of snaps. That takes away from actual playmakers.
Seriously. Why the **** is anyone talking about Taysom Hill?
Was Callahan truly worthless, or did MM have his head so far up his ass that he couldn't bothered to find out what he had even after the Packers were mathematically eliminated?
Waiting until the two-minute warning of the final game to put Callahan in was a giant middle finger to the fans.
I'm good with this over Chris Weinke.
Getting Boyle probably worked out for the best, but sticking with an obviously failed Hundley for so long was a deeply unsatisfying way to get there.
It sure exposed a huge weakness on this team, Aaron Rodgers.
Fedya posted:Getting Boyle probably worked out for the best, but sticking with an obviously failed Hundley for so long was a deeply unsatisfying way to get there.
Graham Harrell. Hundley wasn't an isolated incident of the QB guru seeing what he wanted to see in a player rather than what was actually there.
YATittle posted:Haha sure looks like he's lost all interest in things football. Can't see how ANYONE will give him a decent contract offer next year.
If HAHa isn't careful, He'll be selling used mobile homes in Alabama next year!
MichiganPacker2 posted:Herschel posted:bvan posted:Why couldn't our brain trust see the talents of Hill?
That would require being able to come up with ideas on how to use said talent that's different from standard expectations.
Taysom Hill is a decent player, but he's a backup role player. Yes, they should have kept him instead of a useless Joe Callahan who they didn't even trust to play instead of Brett Hundley last year. But Taysom Hill looks good because the defense has to defend about 4 other weapons before him.
He's a toy, for sure, but the Saints created actual plays to make him a productive part of the team rather than a clipboard holder who offers basically nothing for his roster spot unless/until your season is shot.
Hill is a GREAT athlete no matter what position he plays. He's working on special teams. Tell me why MM couldn't see that when he had him in camp?
Coaching malpractice.
A 30 year old special teams player, what was there to see?
My guess is the Saints are 10 and one without him and the Packers are about 4, 5 and 1 with him.
Pretty much sums it up.
