Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Yes, the Ginats were beatable.  Just like the Eagles and now the upcoming Vikings.  MM did not have the team as ready as they should have been yesterday.  The Ginats never seemed to lose control of the game, although the Packers may have made a comeback had that second INT not happened.  But even then there was a sense that the Packers lacked determination to fight back and take the lead and hold on to it.

 

Like Bad Bob said in his game summary, "Almost no one elevated their game play yesterday...coaches included."

 

It is kinda embarrassing, to see how mightily the Packers have struggled the last 3 weeks just because they lost one player.  Albeit one very important player.   You would like to think though, that at least the "D" could have stepped up more than they have done so far.

But in these types f games, MM has to come with a better game plan. He is too predictable. Just as everybody knew last year that GB was going to pass, this year teams are putting 7 or even 8 in the box. What does MM do? Exactly what everybody expects.

That approach is not going to cut it, at all.

Hope Barclay is back this week. He is a big part in the running game but MM please, try something different and i am not talking about fake punts!!!

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×