Skip to main content

Grave Digger posted:

Thanks PBoi, that's about what I expected for the Arizona game. Barclay was out of his element in the worst possible way. After Calais Campbell had sack 2 or 3, the Packers needed to get the ball out faster. That's what the Cardinals did when Palmer had been sacked for the second time. They were getting it out lightning fast. Can't wait for routes to develop when you only have 2 seconds to throw it.

Out of his element by playing the position he was kept on the roster to play.

Great take.  

Look, nobody is expecting him to perform as well as the starter but we do expect a certain level of competency in his craft.  Since preseason many of us have been saying he isn't reaching that level and isn't the answer. 

Ran across this when looking for other Packer left tackle information

http://espn.go.com/blog/green-...t-tackle-for-packers

and now am really trying to figure out why Barclay was starting at left tackle?  Did the wear-and-tear on Bulaga since August keep the Packers from even trying it?

W/ Bakhtiari out the move of Bulaga to LT would mean 2 position moves. Putting Barclay at LT was probably looked at as the least disruptive. Of course, Barclay at LT was very disruptive.

I hope Lacy, Starks, Kuhn, Crockett, Ripkowski combine for about 50 carries Sunday night, and about 6 more touches on screens.

Boris posted:

There's only 53 roster spots.

Please explain how we're supposed to stockpile 15 All-Pro O-Linemen in the event all 5 of our starters go down?

    Jees...Boss. Was that a trick question? 

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×