Here's another one today. Basically, saying that ownership went cheap because they didn't want to pay Brogdon. And that they chose poorly by paying Bledsoe about 75% of what they paid Brogdon.
https://www.theringer.com/nba/...bucks-indiana-pacers
Brogdon was a good player, but I don't think he was the piece to get them over the top - he didn't last year against the Raptors. In the 4 games in a row that they lost, he was 7-22 from 3 and 21 for 51 from the floor despite getting a lot of wide open looks.
More importantly, he was hurt for large stretches of both of the last two years.
Now Brogdon has played well for Indiana, but he's typical of a very good player that is now playing on a mediocre team that just gets more shots and handles the ball more. For all the buzz about how he is playing at an all-star level, here's some key differences (and a comparison to Bledsoe).
Last year he shot 43% from the 3 point line, this year he is shooting 31%. Bledsoe is shooting 30% this year.
Last year he shot 51% from the floor, this year he is shooting 46%. Bledsoe is at 47%.
His assist numbers are way up, and his assist to turnover ratio has only gone up from 2.3 last year to 2.8 this year. Bledsoe was at 2.6 last year and 2.3 this year. Basically, they are equivalent in a point guard role. AND Bledsoe was first team all-defense last year and isn't injury prone. Brogdon has already missed 3 games this year for a back injury (which is a bigger long-term concern than a freak injury like Middleton getting kicked in the thigh).
It seems to me the national media wants to find something to drive Giannis out of a small market and they seized on this. Because ownership didn't want to overpay Brogdon, that means they won't do what's necessary to win?