Skip to main content

link

 

The 2011 collective bargaining agreement says teams must spend 89% of the salary cap in cash over two distinct four-year periods (2013-16 and 2017-20).

 

Top spenders for the 2013 and '14 league years were: the Green Bay Packers ($296.9 million, 116% of the cap),

 

 

 

 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

http://www.jsonline.com/sports...688z1-292308221.html

 

"Some NFL organizations would not be able to trim their roster of two well-paid veterans like A.J. Hawk and Brad Jones without some kind of serious consequence to their 2015 salary cap.

 

Not the Green Bay Packers.

 

If they choose to jettison the two linebackers before the start of free agency March 10 — and why wouldn't they? — they will have at least $30 million of salary cap room to sign any number of their 11 unrestricted and three restricted free agents, including the two big ones, receiver Randall Cobb and tackle Bryan Bulaga"

 

 

Originally Posted by Hungry5:

It would be nice, if the guys in charge of my team, knew what the **** they were doing.

  

personnel ? They do fine

But the coaches are not running enough screen passes

 

Not the Green Bay Packers.

 

If they choose to jettison the two linebackers before the start of free agency March 10 — and why wouldn't they? — they will have at least $30 million of salary cap room to sign any number of their 11 unrestricted and three restricted free agents, including the two big ones, receiver Randall Cobb and tackle Bryan Bulaga"

 

 

Way to post facts. Now how in the hell am I supposed to tie my panties in a wad and because today's Fat Tuesday and we still haven't signed Cobb/Bulaga??!?

 

The tightwad charge has always just been a cheap shot from his critics who want him more involved in FA. He's always compensated his players very fairly, and in the case of Jones and Hawk he was way too generous.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×