Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Henry posted:

I'm curious to see how the Chefs scheme Dalvin Cook after their Aaron Jones schooling.

Cook 29 receptions for 239 yards

jones 34 receptions for 355 yards

The packers use the fullback and the halfback as passing targets a lot more than the Vikings do.  It wasnโ€™t the rushing yards that jones had in the last game that killed the Chiefs, it was the passing yards (bubble screen espically).  That passing versatility which kept the defense guessing was the dagger....

Hopefully the chiefs will have back some of their injured D lineman for this game to help them against cook.

 

Last edited by Geaux-Packers
Henry posted:

I don' think that defense is good enough.  I would focus on Cook and spooking SpuzzCuz as much as possible.  Then Diggs can go pout some more.

I think the other side of this game the chiefs High powered offense even without Mahomes.  They have sooooo many offensive weapons that the chiefs defense hopefully only has to โ€œhold serveโ€ against the Vikings.  I think a high scoring game by both teams would be an advantage to the chiefs.  Diggs and theilen are good but they arenโ€™t tyrek hill.  Cousins is about as good as KCโ€™s backup....  advantage KC...

Henry posted:
Geaux-Packers posted:

I would favor a bears win, they contribute twice to our strength of victory percentage, eagles donโ€™t at all.  Itโ€™s a tiebreaker.  We want the lions and bears to win as much as possible so we have an tiebreaker over other teams.

Except if they win so much one of them wins the division.  That's a bit more important.

The bears and lions have about a 5% chance of winning the division at this point (combined).  But I take your point.  We want our opponents (KC included) to have as many wins as possible in case we are tied with New Orleans at the end... 

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×