Skip to main content

Brees' pursuit of Unitas revealing of both men
sportsillustrated.cnn.com

by Peter King on Friday, October 5th, 2012
quote:


1. I'm amazed it lasted this long -- 52 years -- and I'm amazed Unitas went 47 games (one game shy of four full regular seasons in those days) throwing at least one touchdown pass between 1957 and 1960. Unitas' streak lasted until 1960. The best offense in the Western Conference that year (Green Bay) completed 137 passes with nine touchdown throws.

2. In Unitas' 47 games, he threw 102 touchdown passes. In Brees' 47, he threw 114. That shows how ahead of his time Unitas was.

3. To illustrate what a different era Unitas played in, just look at some of the passing lines he had during the streak. On Nov. 3, 1957, in a home loss to Pittsburgh, Unitas completed two-of-nine passes. One was a five-yard touchdown toss to Raymond Berry. Against Green Bay in 1958, Unitas completed five balls all day, but two were for touchdowns.

The Unitas family, through son Joe, sent a classy letter to Brees this week, wishing him well as he plays to break the record.

"The way Dad was,'' said Joe Unitas from his home in Las Vegas, "he felt records were made to be broken. I remember his saying once about this, 'I didn't know I was setting any record, and I didn't care. All I cared about was 'Did we win the game?' continue


Knowing the way the game was played back then and the way it's played now I thought Ross Tucker's Tweet was spot on
quote:
RossTuckerNFL
Not that impressed by Brees tying Unitas consecutive TD record. VERY impressed Johnny U pulled that off in his era


The Profootball Hall of Fame made a video to commemorate Unitas's amazing accomplishment.

quote:
Two Minutes of Pro Football History: From Sandlots to Hall of Fame
Johnny Unitas went from the semi-pro sandlots to stringing together one of the NFL's seemingly untouchable records.


I know this isn't Packer related, besides the fact that two Packer QBs held the record before Unitas, but anytime an old record is broken it's a nice opportunity to ask the older generations about players the younger generations never had a chance to see.

Any older folks have memories of Unitas?
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Only saw him at the very end of his career. Two things I remember was that he was as tough as the old, black high-tops he wore, and the respect he commanded just by walking onto the field.

Another thing to remember about Johnny U's record is that it came before receivers were treated as glass. Receivers then had guys draped all over them as the ball was coming, they were bumped off routes all the way down the field, etc. Today they can run free and the QB just has to find them. Unitas had to wedge the ball in or find a wide open guy. He also had to take a beating compared to QBs today. If you watch the first video, you'll see him get cracked upside the head -- the old head slap that was legal back then. Unitas took shot after shot long after he let the ball go. Today those plays would result in penalties and lots of fines.

We all know the players today are faster and quicker, but I think in Unitas' day they were bare-knuckle tougher. When you look at the rules, the fewer number of games, and just the very style of football back then... well, Unitas' record remains an incredible feat. There was only one Johnny U., and he deserved all the accolades he got then and still gets today.

I bet Brees' record -- no matter how long it goes -- is broken a whole lot sooner. It's just the nature of today's game is so different when compared to the '50s and '60s.
As a kid in the 60's the big QB debate was Johnny U. versus Bart Starr. It was sort of like the Peyton Manning versus Tom Brady debates of the 2000's. Manning rolled up the big numbers, while all Brady did was win.

Pundits of the time were in awe of Unitas. Starr didn't really get his due until the 4th and 5th titles in 1966 and 1967. Unitas deserves the plaudits he gets, no question, but I still think Starr is underrated. Best big game QB ever.

Something not mentioned yet, those were the days when QB's called their own plays. If you watch the Colts-Giants world championship game from the late 1950's, "the greatest game ever played" that put the NFL on the map, you can see Unitas' control over the game. It was masterful. Only superceded by Bart's playcalling on the drive that won the Ice Bowl.
quote:
Originally posted by cuqui:
As a kid in the 60's the big QB debate was Johnny U. versus Bart Starr. It was sort of like the Peyton Manning versus Tom Brady debates of the 2000's. Manning rolled up the big numbers, while all Brady did was win.

Pundits of the time were in awe of Unitas. Starr didn't really get his due until the 4th and 5th titles in 1966 and 1967. Unitas deserves the plaudits he gets, no question, but I still think Starr is underrated. Best big game QB ever.

Something not mentioned yet, those were the days when QB's called their own plays. If you watch the Colts-Giants world championship game from the late 1950's, "the greatest game ever played" that put the NFL on the map, you can see Unitas' control over the game. It was masterful. Only superceded by Bart's playcalling on the drive that won the Ice Bowl.


This.

The Starr/Unitas duels of the 1960's were sights to behold.

...especially since Bart won most of them (major exception the 13-10 loss in the last seconds in 1967. However, Bart's consolation prize that season was a Super Bowl trophy and a Super Bowl MVP award).
I always remember that Johnny always seemed slightly hunched forward and his delivery, while accurate, was not very smooth.

One factor few seem aware of is that the NFL used a fatter ball back then, and the AFL adopted a slightly skinnier one; I think until the merger each played with its own ball, but the AFL ball became standard after that. The AFL ball was easier to throw.
quote:
Originally posted by ammo:
Man bvan, you must be older than Hauser!! And he's older than dirt.


LOL, when I was young dirt was still a rock!
I'm 68 and grew up three blocks from old City Stadium. It was very easy to sneak into and the beer bellied off duty cops didn't expend very much effort in trying to catch us.
In 1954 I started sneaking in as a 10 yr. old.

My friend in high school, Tom Mueller, was a Colts fan just because of Unitas. Johnny was tough as nails, destroyed his body with his career, to the point he couldn't even straighten his arm after retiring. I saw a documentary on him a couple years ago. He was a bit bitter in his later years about the way the NFL treated the legends who built the game into what it was, but I'm certain he was in demand at autograph shows. Like Jim Brown, Butkus, Starr and Nitschke, he was a larger than life character.
quote:
Originally posted by YATittle:
Johnny was tough as nails, destroyed his body with his career, to the point he couldn't even straighten his arm after retiring.


He was a wreck. He could hardly walk, and his hands were in a permanent clench from all the damage they absorbed.

The guy couldn't even get a break when he died -- it was on the first anniversary of 9/11, so Unitas's death was barely noticed.
I think it was $6 a game playing semi-pro ball on weekends after he was cut by the Steelers. Apparently the coach said he wasn't smart enough to play pro ball and never let him throw a pass in training camp (this from the team that had Terry Bradshaw with his famous "good ol' dumb southern boy" image). Yup, that was a smart decision by the coach. Unitas became famous, I think the coach became unemployed.
quote:
Originally posted by Hungry5:
quote:
Originally posted by FLPACKER:
QB stats of that era make Starr's low interception rate even more impressive

I'm a huge Starr fan... but he had 152 TDs with 138 INTs for his career. Unitas had similar %...


It was a way different era.
Defense had all the rules in their favor.

If a QB of that period could maintain a better than 50% completion average, he was a happy QB!
quote:
Originally posted by Hungry5:
quote:
Originally posted by FLPACKER:
QB stats of that era make Starr's low interception rate even more impressive

I'm a huge Starr fan... but he had 152 TDs with 138 INTs for his career. Unitas had similar %...



....Starr had a 4.4 INT % , Unitas 4.9% fairly similar. Not comparing Starr to Unitas, but rather to the norm of the era. They were both well below the average in this category

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×