Skip to main content

Aaron Rodgers, with today’s win over the Detroit Lions, is now having the 3rd greatest passing season in the history of the NFL. His Rating has been 100+ in 11 of 12 games this season, with only the Buccaneer game a red mark on an otherwise stellar 2020 campaign.

The stats are absolutely eye popping:

312 for 448 passes (70% completion percentage), 3,685 yards passing, 39 TD passes, 4 INT. 119.5 QB rating. And he has three games to play.

Let me repeat that. His 119.5 QB rating is the third highest, all-time, behind Peyton Manning’s 121.1 in 2004, and Rodgers’ own 122.5 in 2011, his first MVP season.

If there was any question as to who the greatest quarterback in NFL history was before this year (with the media continually gushing about Tom Brady), I think this season has answered that. A 37 year old Rodgers is playing at a level only he and Manning (who played at least half his games in a dome every year) have ever reached. He has passed 400 passing touchdowns, and still has only 88 career INT. He was the first to ever go over 300 with less than 100 INT.

The last ten years, including today? 316 TD passes and 56 INT. He hasn’t had double digit interceptions since 2010, when he and the Packers won their fourth Super Bowl-they haven’t made it back since, and that should in no way be a black mark on Aaron Rodgers.

Super Bowls are team accomplishments. The 2020 season crystallizes what #12 has had to deal with every season, save one. He will never have Tom Brady’s 6 rings. He’ll also never have the team and coaching Brady did. A top ten scoring defense in 16 of 19 years helps a passer win a whole lot of games. Rodgers hasn’t had that. In 2010, the Packers finished second in points allowed, and Rodgers schooled the best scoring defense in the game in beating Pittsburgh. Last year marked the first time since 2010 where Rodgers had benefited from a top ten scoring defense, but then they proceeded to get gashed by a backup 49ers running back. And again this year, the defense, despite having some real talent, is middle of the road. Again.

Russell Wilson, the guy behind him in all-time passer rating (sorry, I’m not including Mahomes and Watson. 1,500 attempts is three years of playing, only)? This is where his Seahawks defense ranked in the NFL in points allowed in his first five seasons:

2012, 1st

2013, 1st

2014, 1st

2015, 1st,

2016, 3rd

And he won only one Super Bowl, with inarguably one of the greatest defenses the game has ever seen. And the new “Golden Boy”, Patrick Mahomes? His Chiefs defense is 6th in the NFL in points allowed. And they were seventh last year. I like Mahomes a lot. But does any quarterback in the NFL have more offensive talent around them than Mahomes?

We need to appreciate just what we are seeing, because we’ll never see it again. And, it’s only a cruel twist of fate that Aaron Rodgers hasn’t had the team behind him many other contemporaries have had.

I’ll take Rodgers, now, over Brady, Montana, Brees, Unitas, Young, Manning, Tarkenton, Graham, Mahomes (he hasn’t played long enough, or faced any adversity), Wilson, or even the guy that I considered the best ever prior to this season, Dan Marino. Marino, like Rodgers, never had the team around him some of the other greats have had. He didn’t have a single 1,000 yard running back until Karim Abdul Jabbar broke that 1,000 yard barrier in 1996, Marino’s 14th season.

Rodgers is the best to ever do it. Of that, I’m now convinced. And I’m so thankful I’ve been able to watch in him a green and gold uniform. He’s been a joy to watch.

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

It’s sometimes hard to truly appreciate just how great something or someone is until it’s over, then all you can do is look back wistfully, as you remember how amazing it was to be able to experience that thing, or person, whatever the case may be. I don’t take any of 12’s amazing plays for granted. It really is a gift for Packers (and all true football) fans that we have gotten to see the very best there ever was (and still is). Aaron Rodgers is the Da Vinci or Mozart of the American game of football.

A bit more context. I remember well the hoopla surrounding Bert like most of us do. Much of it was Madden style smoke up the ass, but just as much was watching the guy establish new norms for the league as a whole. 1995-1997, Favre put up an astounding 110 TD passes compared to a "paltry" 40 INTs. Nearly a 3/1 ratio which at the time was stellar. Bert won the MVP each of those 3 seasons, sharing the last one with Barry Sanders.

The prospect of AR and a TD/INT ratio of 4/1 for his CAREER is off the charts incredible. Maintaining such numbers at 37 years old only further shows Rodgers consistency of high level play, and it's extremely rarified air this guy shares. It was great to witness #4, but having watched Favre has only made this guy more special and enjoyable.

@artis posted:

A bit more context. I remember well the hoopla surrounding Bert like most of us do. Much of it was Madden style smoke up the ass, but just as much was watching the guy establish new norms for the league as a whole. 1995-1997, Favre put up an astounding 110 TD passes compared to a "paltry" 40 INTs. Nearly a 3/1 ratio which at the time was stellar. Bert won the MVP each of those 3 seasons, sharing the last one with Barry Sanders.

The prospect of AR and a TD/INT ratio of 4/1 for his CAREER is off the charts incredible. Maintaining such numbers at 37 years old only further shows Rodgers consistency of high level play, and it's extremely rarified air this guy shares. It was great to witness #4, but having watched Favre has only made this guy more special and enjoyable.

And we have Jordan Love waiting in the wings.

All bitching aside, let's assume smarter people than us saw/see something in Love...how valuable will it ultimately be for him to have sat behind Rodgers learning and absorbing?

Maybe we'll have a top 10 QB in 2025 if that is the case.

Call me Mr. Seashells and Sunshine

@Blair Kiel posted:

All bitching aside, let's assume smarter people than us saw/see something in Love...how valuable will it ultimately be for him to have sat behind Rodgers learning and absorbing?

Maybe we'll have a top 10 QB in 2025 if that is the case.

Call me Mr. Seashells and Sunshine

That may very well be. Four years in the future, the wisdom of the draft picks that we had in 2020 may be revealed. Having a great quarterback, and a great running back to balance the offense, certainly can make a team dangerous. I hope that Gutey is proven to be a genius down the road. I hope that he’s proven a genius after Rodgers has retired with two or three Super Bowl rings in his safe. Because, if Aaron retires with only the one ring, it’s going to reflect rather poorly in the front office and organization.

I’ve said it before. The quarterback position in the NFL, bar none, is the hardest to find a truly transformative talent. Look at the Bears and Vikings. They’ve been looking for a most of my life. The Browns haven’t had a bonafide star since...Brian Sipe? Or, maybe Bernie Kosar was close. I don’t remember his play too well, only that John Elway always beat him.

For the Packers to have had two top tier, Hall of Fame quarterbacks with five (possibly six) MVPs between them, and only win two Super Bowls-one, each, in 26 years-that has to be looked at as a massive failing. Green Bay’s defense seems to be the same bend don’t break, hope for the best unit, every year, despite a ridiculous amount of draft capitol and free agency money spent (Amos, the Smith brothers).

Aaron’s historical place is secure, no matter what he does. Anybody that understands the game, and has an appropriate command of the game’s history, can clearly see his greatness. He’s second or third in playoff career passer rating. Brady’s 15th. Yet 6 rings=GOAT in the eyes of the dumbed down masses, even though many of those rings came about because the rest of the team lifted him up. Brady got his first ring doing absolutely nothing in the playoffs, and they should have been out of the playoffs, losing to the Raiders. We all know how the league bailed them out.

Remember when Majik was the next franchise guy? This level of qb play for 28 years is unheard of. Part astute roster moves, part good fortune, part luck. When it ends, people will be ecstatic and vindictive and giddy to rub it in the faces of Packer fans. And that will make it all the sweeter...

@artis posted:

Remember when Majik was the next franchise guy? This level of qb play for 28 years is unheard of. Part astute roster moves, part good fortune, part luck. When it ends, people will be ecstatic and vindictive and giddy to rub it in the faces of Packer fans. And that will make it all the sweeter...



Oh man do I remember that year well.  1989 was so freaking exciting because not only were the Packers winning (something as a fan I hadn't really experienced to much) but it looked like we finally had our QB.  Dickey was pretty good and i liked him but Majik seemed like the guy we would have for 15 years.

I totally agree that sometimes it is a perfect storm of great moves and just dumb luck.  I think we got very lucky with Rodgers with everyone passing on him and falling down to us.  Every week when I watch the Packers play I just sit back and go damn that guy is great just absolutely great.

@The Heckler posted:

Oh man do I remember that year well.  1989 was so freaking exciting because not only were the Packers winning (something as a fan I hadn't really experienced to much) but it looked like we finally had our QB.  Dickey was pretty good and i liked him but Majik seemed like the guy we would have for 15 years.

I totally agree that sometimes it is a perfect storm of great moves and just dumb luck.  I think we got very lucky with Rodgers with everyone passing on him and falling down to us.  Every week when I watch the Packers play I just sit back and go damn that guy is great just absolutely great.

And we felt the same about #4. I used to tell my stepson how we need to appreciate watching this guy because he won't be around forever. Rodgers has exceeded that for this fan. It's cool to listen to AR talk about what he learned by watching Bert, and then see it in action, minus all the bonehead plays and int's. For all the headaches and cardiac arrests this team regularly dispenses, it's been a remarkable run that none of us could have foreseen nearly 30 years ago.

@bvan posted:

Does anyone have the stats that show the years of two QB's (Favre/Rodgers) compared to the number of QB's the rest of the NFCN went through?

Probably, but you'll need several pages to list them all.

Super Bowl wins will always be a significant component for many in what constitutes greatness at the position. He's easily the most talented player at the position I've seen (Mahomes is right up there as well) and I suspect most of the Brady is #1 crowd would agree that in terms of just talent it's not that close a call.

It seems as Brady fades to retirement people are beginning to forget how good he once was.  He was never mobile but he was the most clutch QB I have ever seen.  AR surely more talented overall but Brady was money pretty much any time he needed to be and with the lack of talent he had around him on offense, that was often.   I'm surprised he never got the nickname "Dr." for how surgical he could be.  All the benefits of playing for BB and having a real D helped him get the wins and rings but he brought a ton to the table.  Any lesser QB, even with all that help, would not have 6 rings.  Not saying that's the only measure but it should mean a lot.  That's all that needs to be said about Brady.

Last edited by DH13
@DH13 posted:

It seems as Brady fades to retirement people are beginning to forget how good he once was.  He was never mobile but he was the most clutch QB I have ever seen.  AR surely more talented overall but Brady was money pretty much any time he needed to be and with the lack of talent he had around him on offense, that was often.   I'm surprised he never got the nickname "Dr." for how surgical he could be.  All the benefits of playing for BB and having a real D helped him get the wins and rings but he brought a ton to the table.  Any lesser QB, even with all that help, would not have 6 rings.  Not saying that's the only measure but it should mean a lot.  That's all that needs to be said about Brady.

Brady has been underrated for most of his career. This goes back to college when he was forced to platoon with Drew Henson because Henson had the stronger arm and was more athletic.

As good as Brady has been, the best way to think about comparing him with other QBs is what would have happened if these other QBs were put in the positions he was in New England. Would NE have fewer titles had they had Rodgers, Brees, or P. Manning instead of Brady? I would say no, but the list of guys who would have done as well as Brady is very short. On the other hand, if you replaced Rodgers with Brady on the Packers since 2008 would the Packers have done as well? I would say no.

The other consideration of Brady is how much his willingness to take less money over the years has allowed the Patriots to get over the top in some years. It's admirable that he did this, but the fact his wife is worth 400 million dollars makes it an easier decision for him. That extra 5-10 million in some years allowed the Patriots to sign a few more stop-gap veterans every year. Having the money to sign a decent ILB would have really helped Rodgers the last couple of years or to be able to sign a good, veteran corner would have been nice in 2016 when the got to the NFC title game with Randall and Rollins as key guys in the backfield.

The other consideration of Brady is how much his willingness to take less money over the years has allowed the Patriots to get over the top in some years. It's admirable that he did this, but the fact his wife is worth 400 million dollars makes it an easier decision for him. That extra 5-10 million in some years allowed the Patriots to sign a few more stop-gap veterans every year. Having the money to sign a decent ILB would have really helped Rodgers the last couple of years or to be able to sign a good, veteran corner would have been nice in 2016 when the got to the NFC title game with Randall and Rollins as key guys in the backfield.

Brady's willingness to take less $ was matched by a New England front office that signed and traded for veteran players like almost no other in order to win Super Bowls.

Green Bay took the exact opposite approach with GM Ted Thompson boasting about how few players there were on the roster who came from other teams as if that was in and of itself some sort of achievement. Thus, it is doubtful GB would have "sign[ed] a good, veteran corner" or anyone else from outside the organization prior to Gutey's arrival even if Rodgers had been making less $.

Indeed, nothing actually prohibited Thompson from trying to upgrade over LaDarius Gunter as a starting CB on the 2016 team that Rodgers' carried to a NFC Championship game blowout by Atlanta other than his stubborn approach to roster building.

The GREATNESS in New England over the past 2 decades resulted from the combination of a great front office (when it came to veteran talent acquisition not the draft), a great head coach, and a great QB.

When it comes to the Packers front office, head coach, and QB over the past 13 years, the GREATNESS begins and ends with QB Aaron Rodgers.

Last edited by SteveLuke
@YATittle posted:

Aaron Rodgers has more touchdown passes (39) than JK Scott has punts (38) in 2020, and Mason Crosby has only attempted 15 field goals.

50 TD's and 15 FG's. That's a damn good team ratio. A typical McCarthy season saw Mason with 30+ FG attempts.

At least as rare as a dominant QB is an owner/GM/coaching triumvirate that shares an outsized ability to construct a team. Not only by recognizing unsung talents but also getting them under contracts that don't cripple the team over the long term. Kraft/Belichek are, of course, the standard bearers for this.

I think the Packers are pretty good in this regard. They have 4 players that are in the argument for best at their position league wide (AR, Davantae,  Bahk and Alexander) plus high performers (starters for most other teams) in A Jones, Elgton, K Clark, M Crosby.

If depth has suffered, well, that's just the way it plays in the salary cap era.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×