Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Pos

+ Spreading the ball around in the passing game.  Reports of Bob’s demise were exaggerated.

+ 2nd half pass rush.  Keke, Lowry and Gary.

+ 4th down stops on D.

+ Punting game.   This dude is the best we’ve had in GB in a long time.

+ CBs played pretty well besides the TD on Stokes.  If he gets his head around sooner that’s a pick though  

Negatives

- Interior oline had a rough game.  Hopefully Bahk is back for AZ and we can get Jenkins back inside.

- No punts from Washington.   They moved the ball all day without a single punt.

+ Gary’s forced fumble, Sullivan’s INT, Keke’s sacks and pressures

+ Adams’ great sidelines catch. Tonyan and Lazard both played really well today.

+ Punter continues to impress. Not an exaggeration when I say he may be one of the top 2 or 3 Punters I can ever remember playing for the Pack.

- Offensive Line had worst game since the Saints game.  

- Pass rush was way too inconsistent

- Savage really has some brick hands.  The INT he missed was a tough catch so I’ll excuse him for that, but the attempted fumble recovery was pathetic.  No way in hell should he have let Washington recover that, but somehow he let a sure fire turnover for the Pack squirt away.  

- To commemorate the dedication of the Bart Starr Memorial Bridge, The OL did it's best impression in the first half  of the 1960's "Look Out!" blocks!



+ The Ghost of Brent Favor returned to Lambeau in the form of  Taylor Heinicke. complete with fumbles, picks, downfield blocking and the WTF just happened sideline looks. Only thing missing were dick pics and rocket balls

+ A NFC win

I was worried about a let down against a team that is not as good as GB but MLF had them ready to play

The defense.  Yes I actually said that.  WFT moved the ball pretty well but when they needed to make a play they did it.  Even with all the injuries on that side of the ball they are somehow holding their own

- interior of the OL had a bad day.  In fairness though the strongest part of the WFT might be their DL

+
ARod recently said this team reminded him of the 2010 team, and I agree with him in the context of when so many injuries occur, and it goes beyond "next man up" to "FIDO".

-
I'm afraid this team is closer to the 2016 team that miraculously made it to the NFCCG, only to have the DBs exposed for who they really were all along.

That team, and this one, defensively, are just good enough to compete against the weaker offenses, but I shudder to think what the Bradys and Staffords of the league could do to them.

@The Heckler posted:

+ A NFC win

I was worried about a let down against a team that is not as good as GB but MLF had them ready to play

The defense.  Yes I actually said that.  WFT moved the ball pretty well but when they needed to make a play they did it.  Even with all the injuries on that side of the ball they are somehow holding their own

- interior of the OL had a bad day.  In fairness though the strongest part of the WFT might be their DL

Although these 2 things didn’t happen we all know they should have.  All TH has to do was run the ball into the end zone…6 points.  All #17 had to do was make an easy catch of a ball that hit his hands while in the end zone…6 points.

Yes the D has looked better,  still a long way to go tho.

+++Our defensive front came alive! Especially Gary and Lowry! Campbell needs to be extended; Allen Lazard! Davante! Sullivan's INT and then giving that INT ball to his father, is pure Packer People! Tonyan played well.

---Dillon. Lack of run production, overall. Officials taking forever to make a call. Our LS allowing a WFT player to run through the A Gap, and block MC's FG attempt, as our LS watched the havoc unfold between his legs, post snap.

@Timmy! posted:

+
ARod recently said this team reminded him of the 2010 team, and I agree with him in the context of when so many injuries occur, and it goes beyond "next man up" to "FIDO".

-
I'm afraid this team is closer to the 2016 team that miraculously made it to the NFCCG, only to have the DBs exposed for who they really were all along.

That team, and this one, defensively, are just good enough to compete against the weaker offenses, but I shudder to think what the Bradys and Staffords of the league could do to them.

So much of it is individual match ups. Dean Lowry has looked great the last three weeks vs. back up guards, but how will he fare vs TB's starting RG? Same thing with our edge rushers. Most times when we say "boy, so and so is playing better!" it is really more about who he is matched against. Yes, with certain players we know they are typically going to win their match up no matter who it is against (Clark, Adams, Bak) but it is the others who really decide the game.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×