JerMichael Finley is scheduled to make $7 million in 2013. It's all but a foregone conclusion that Greg Jennings will be leaving Green Bay.
As somebody that's not overly familiar with how the financials work out in the NFL, I will ask for some opinions here.
Finley, though he was better in the second half, is being paid as a top 5 tight end in the NFL, and his performance does not equal his pay. And I'm not sure if he'll ever return to the player he was before the injury. Greg Jennings, though he has been injured much of the last season, showed in the last game of the regular season that he was still a receiver to contend with.
Would the Packers not be better off keeping Jennings, using some of Finley's money to pay him? It's been discussed that Randall Cobb can do the exact same thing that Jennings has done, but I'm not ready to make Cobb into a pure possession receiver. He offers too much as a "wildcat" option, so to speak, and he's at his most dangerous when he's utilized in several different positions. Part of Cobb's appeal is that he's a match up nightmare for other teams.
If we cut Finley, kept Jennings, and made DJ Williams (who I think will ultimately be the starting tight end) the starter now, would that not also free up a little bit more cap room to help resign somebody like BJ Raji, or perhaps pursue a middle linebacker in free agency?
Original Post