I think it's a legit question. If its been covered to death, then lock her up.
The popular choice would be Rodgers. Without his talent, leadership, and toughness there's no way we would have utilized all the talent on this offense. Not many QB's could lose their main go-to guy and still excel at the level he did this year.
Clay III was hugely missed in the 2nd half of the Washington game and all of the Miami game. He has been GB's only consistent pass rush for the entire season, and has become the face of the defense. They're quite simply a completely different unit with him in there.
Starks came on late in the year and provided the Packers with a legitimate running game that defenses needed to at least pay attention to. This opened up options in the passing game and made their play action that much more effective. Do you think we really would have made the run we did in the post season without this threat?
The play of Williams and Shields can't be overlooked as well. Can we forget how quality QB's torched GB in 2009 with Williams playing half the year and still coming on and Shields still in college? The play of these two guys has allowed Capers to be more aggressive with his blitz packages, and made other defenders on the team thrive.
There are probably others you could bring up, but this is at least a starting point for conversation. Team chemistry and coaching has been just as, if not more, important with this team too.
Add Reaction
ðŊâĪïļððððĪððđððâïļððŧððŋðĒðĪŠðĪĢâ
ððĪ·ðĨðððĪŊOriginal Post