There has been a lot of discussion about scoring being down due to more defenses playing 2 high and not giving up the big play, but I listened to a podcast the other day where a high school coach talked about some of the new techniques, defensive fronts, teams are using to combat the zone blocking scheme that may also be contributing. I believe he called it a "tight front" and it's concept is to not let the o-lineman to be able to combo block and get to ILBers. While the concept is nothing new, he said the way they are doing it is. The host of the podcast said that by his count 13 current teams have coaches from the "Shannahan tree" and employ the scheme. Said that when he looked at these offenses using the criteria of ; yards gained, points scored, turnovers committed, and averaged them, they would rank 18th in the NFL compared to the stats of the 32 teams. The coach said the way to combat the defensive front was to run traps and pull o-lineman. He said he saw the Packers pull Myers once last week and we gained 5 yards, but never went back to it. Some interesting discussion about whether the league has caught up to this style of offense.
Replies sorted oldest to newest
MLF's offense, first year OC, first year OL coach, first year WR coach...NFL is about adjustments...if your first year position coaches aren't making them, it's up to the HC to figure it out.
adapt or die
Sounds like it's time for the return of "The Packer Sweep" as run by Kramer, Thurston and Hornung.
Does an Offensive coordinator really do much with Lafleur? He should spend more time with the line and get that part functional
X X X X X X
O O O O O O
”You put a hat on a hat” - John Madden
”You live by the pass, you die by the pass.” - My Dad
I think it's simple. IMO we had a great O-Line coach that is now a mediocre Offensive Coordinator. I think we are missing him when it comes to coaching the line and I don't think he is as good helping with schemes (of course this is all a guess on my part). Sometimes it's better not to promote people because they are best staying where they are.
People tend to get promoted to their highest level of incompetency.
@Shadow posted:Sometimes it's better not to promote people because they are best staying where they are.People tend to get promoted to their highest level of incompetency.
Nathaniel Hackett is a prime example of someone who should have stayed where he was in the same position.
I think it is a failure to recognize the different skill set needed for a head coach .... successful coordinators don't need (but may have) the same skill set of leadership that a head coach has to have.