Hungry5 posted:Once again, Janis shows us why he's on the 53.
He used his 4.3 speed to run/walk horizontally 10 yards.
Hungry5 posted:Once again, Janis shows us why he's on the 53.
He used his 4.3 speed to run/walk horizontally 10 yards.
Almost every time MM calls a timeout at the end of the 1st half, it ends up backfiring. Yet he just keeps doing it.
Oh, and Capers sucks.
Down 3 why does it feel like they are down 30
Yes I know I'm the resident Nellie
time for more booze
Gsands posted:Watch for Mike to make halftime adjustments. Boy oh Boy are the Skins going to be surprised.
So will everyone else
Fandame posted:52 is becoming a one-trick pony. I am thinking he was much better inside than out.
He revitalized his career when he went inside last year. His sack numbers went up.
I thought he should have stayed there, but the whole world cried about his "natural position."
[**cough**(bull****)**cough, cough**]
Anyway with Ryan out I think he should go back.
Gsands posted:Watch for Mike to make halftime adjustments. Boy oh Boy are the Skins going to be surprised.
Mike: "Switch to Double Secret All-Barclay Plan!"
18 year old scotch with Triscuits? Yeah that's my literal interpretation of this team right now
Injuries or no, I expect a new contract for Lang next year.
Who's safe on this defense?
I'd say Daniels, Clark, Thomas, Ryan, Martinez, HaHa, Burnett ... Who else???
RoyalWulff posted:Who's safe on this defense?
I'd say Daniels, Clark, Thomas, Ryan, Martinez, HaHa, Burnett ... Who else???
T.S. Eliot.
Can't say I have a lot of confidence in the coaching staff to make the most of the windy game conditions.
RoyalWulff posted:Who's safe on this defense?
I'd say Daniels, Clark, Thomas, Ryan, Martinez, HaHa, Burnett ... Who else???
This keeps up TT won't be deciding
Need a stop.
PackerPatrick posted:Injuries or no, I expect a new contract for Lang next year.
He's done. Old, injured guard. Any money spent is a bad investment.
Christ Daniels. AGAIN??
btw I don't see contact to helmet there. BS call.
Kill me now.
Bull**** call
OK.
Time to force a TO. We need a strip fumble!
Weak call, but could be a game changer - prolonging a drive that could put them up 2 scores.
can we buy a turnover?
****!
wide open.
I think he was open
Whatever, I'm sick of drive- extending penalties on Mike Daniels.
The refs are right there. They know who is acting like what.
****ing sick of his act. That's two weeks in a row.
Now I get it. It isn't Capers' scheme that sucks. It's that our defense doesn't have an actual TE to practice against.
titmfatied posted:PackerPatrick posted:Injuries or no, I expect a new contract for Lang next year.
He's done. Old, injured guard. Any money spent is a bad investment.
I did not say a BIG contract...
It is beyond belief how open Reed was on that catch. Literally beyond belief.
here comes the flag
PEPPERS!!!
FINALLY!!! AGAIN!
Big ass stop!
Yay, lets all Suck Daniels dick over his "enthusiasm."
And bring back Wayne ****ing Simmons while we are at it.
Blair Kiel posted:It is beyond belief how open Reed was on that catch. Literally beyond belief.
Long time listener, first time watcher?
Capers scheme may suck, but they literally don't have any CBs - a bunch of young CBs got hurt. They don't have any real TEs, RBs, or backup OGs either - there's no excuse for that.
Ok. Fine.
Let's go get 7 and we have the lead.
CAPackFan95 posted:Blair Kiel posted:It is beyond belief how open Reed was on that catch. Literally beyond belief.
Long time listener, first time watcher?
Another guy was 20 yards from anyone in the end zone on that Peppers sack.
There's 3 points on #76
but he is what we need
Any time this defense holds a team to 3 should be counted as a big victory.
Another wide open receiver. Luckily Peppers got the sack.
Now lets see those great adjustments for our offense!!
MichiganPacker posted:Capers scheme may suck, but they literally don't have any CBs - a bunch of young CBs got hurt. They don't have any real TEs, RBs, or backup OGs either - there's no excuse for that.
Thanks Teddy