Skip to main content

FLPACKER posted:
I still maintain that it goes well beyond Rodgers.A QB does not all-of-a-sudden lose it. I have nothing to prove it but it almost seems like the Broncos figured out something about our receivers, be it their steps, body language, something that tipped off their routes & cuts. Coaches love to share effective techniques with other coaches. It just seems like it has more to do with scheme than players right now. MM seemed to have it figured out in first half of Lions & first quarter of Giants games, but he stopped using multiple formations & personnel groups, which resulted in below average passing attack. I think that plays that routinely resulted in receivers being open, all of a sudden resulted in no separation. When this happens, Rodgers begins to press, & then misses guys who are open.

Last year I noticed for the first time opposing DB's sometimes letting our receivers get a little bit ahead and then just following them. Looks like it kind nullifies the route tree thing: whichever way the receiver cuts, just follow him. It works on the slower receivers. DB's can just catch up to them after the cut.

Last edited by Pistol GB

A good excellent hitter in manny-ball fails 66% of the time.

Still though....Room for improvement.

"Gentlemen we are going to relentlessly chase perfection. Knowing full well we will not catch it because nothing is perfect. But we are going to relentlessly chase it. Because in the process we will catch excellence. I'm not even remotely interested in being just good."

Ghost of Lambeau posted:

The Packers have played 6 games against a top 10 defense (according to rankings in the week they played).  Only one of those were prior to the last 6 games.  5 of them were in the last six games.  It didn't look good considering how they played against worse defenses - but they came thru.  They persevered and won. 

Let me guess. The one good D they played before the streak was.... The Giants?

"Mister. The concentration period of a college student is 5 minutes. High school is 3 minutes. Kindergarten is 30 seconds. You don't even have that. So where does that put you?"

Vince to Jerry Kramer as a green kid after he jumped offsides in a scrimmage. 

Afterwards Vince walked through the locker room. Put his hand on the back of Jerrys head and said. "Son. One day you'll be the best guard in football". And walked away. 

There is nothing that beats the past, present, and future of the Green Bay Packers. 

Last edited by ChilliJon
YATittle posted:
Ghost of Lambeau posted:

The Packers have played 6 games against a top 10 defense (according to rankings in the week they played).  Only one of those were prior to the last 6 games.  5 of them were in the last six games.  It didn't look good considering how they played against worse defenses - but they came thru.  They persevered and won. 

Let me guess. The one good D they played before the streak was.... The Giants?

Good guess, but at the time they played the Giants defense was ranked 11th overall - in fact it probably would have been my guess.  It was Minnesota in the second game - they were ranked 10th at the time. 

Pikes Peak posted:

Amish women, when making a quilt, intentionally make a mistake or two because according to their belief only God is perfect.

When I make something I usually make an unintentional mistake which I always consider to be the uniqueness of the item.  And it provides entertainment afterward when you challenge people to find the mistake.

The title of the thread was originally about his getting the D to jump offsides for free plays but it makes more sense now in the bigger picture.  He's doing things QB's aren't supposed to be able to do.  Imagine an opposing D or DC scheming to stop him or slow him down only to have him do what he does.  At some point they're going to just throw their hands up and shake their heads mumbling "I hate my job".  

It does make his performance during that stretch between DEN 15 and IND 16 even more puzzling.

DH13 posted:

It does make his performance during that stretch between DEN 15 and IND 16 even more puzzling.

2015 - No Nelson. Hurt or missed games - Cobb, Adams, Montgomery. No TE threat, Phat Eddieâ„Ē.

2016 - Nelson not being Jordy! until about 6 or so games in. Cook working in to the Offense and then he goes down.

Hungry5 posted:
DH13 posted:

It does make his performance during that stretch between DEN 15 and IND 16 even more puzzling.

2015 - No Nelson. Hurt or missed games - Cobb, Adams, Montgomery. No TE threat, Phat Eddieâ„Ē.

2016 - Nelson not being Jordy! until about 6 or so games in. Cook working in to the Offense and then he goes down.

This has been hashed out ad infinitum and I'm the last one to want to resurrect it but those explanations don't explain him not seeing open receivers and missing them when they were open.  I'm sure there is a tipping point somewhere in the offense where once you have just the right guys and number of guys it all clicks but he really did look...average in that stretch.

I made the original comment as a non sequitur because at this point I don't care what the problem was.  I said good day!

Hungry5 posted:
DH13 posted:

It does make his performance during that stretch between DEN 15 and IND 16 even more puzzling.

2015 - No Nelson. Hurt or missed games - Cobb, Adams, Montgomery. No TE threat, Phat Eddieâ„Ē.

2016 - Nelson not being Jordy! until about 6 or so games in. Cook working in to the Offense and then he goes down.

That plus pressing too hard and letting his fundamentals slip. What I really like about how MM adjusted the offense mid-season is the huge number of easy (for Aaron) throws 12 gets to make now. Fast short throws in rhythm. A lot of those sideline flips or short wheel patterns/come backs are nothing more than long handoffs to good runners in space. Mike makes these adjustments; Aaron starts stacking successes, getting even more mojo back for him and the squad; the additions to the receiving corps and running game get healthy and/or acclimated... now we're seeing this aerial circus.

In another thread someone suggested maybe bringing Chip Kelly in as a consultant to spice up the offense. Why? MM is and has always been a terrific offensive innovator in Green Bay. Sure Aaron makes everything a little easier, but still. McCarthy has the whole fricking package as an HC, IMO.

Last edited by ilcuqui

I didn't say Chip could or should spice up the offense, but Chip's knowledge and perspective of the up-tempo style of offense is something that could add a different dynamic to this offense. McCarthy knows more about running an NFL offense than Chip ever will, but the up-tempo has been something they seemingly want to do more of. They don't seem able to quite make it as effective as it should be though. 

Up-tempo isn't just about getting to the line fast, reading the D and calling the play, it's about controlling the pace of the game to your advantage by varying the tempo of when the ball is snapped. It's a scheme that moves so fast it doesn't allow the D enough time to read the offense and properly communicate the defense. There's a lot that goes into that kind of package where you could be snapping the ball within 10 seconds of the ball being spotted or longer depending on how you're varying the tempo. You have to simplify the scheme on offense when you go into up-tempo mode, including the play calling and the offensive communication. When it's executed well, like New England has done with their Turbo package, it's really tough on defenses. I don't love Chip Kelly or this scheme, but I think both have a place in the NFL. It shouldn't be anyone's primary offense and Chip shouldn't be anyone's HC, but he has some ideas that I think could be valuable to a team with a smart QB like GB or New England. 

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×