Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by Henry:
You find a cure for one type of cancer you find it for all.


Not quite. Actually "cancer" includes hundreds of diseases, not just one. The difficulty is that different cancers are caused by different things, so no one strategy can prevent them all, and different cancers respond to different treatments so no one treatment can cure them all.

Also there is a baking soda treatment for cancer that has shown remarkable success but the doctor who discovered and administered it had his medical license revoked. Cancer is a very political dis-ease.

But if pink towels etc lead to prevention or early detection I'll get over how silly it looks.
quote:
Originally posted by SanDiegoPackFan:
quote:
Originally posted by Iowacheese:
lighten up dum dums....love the pink


well...I love the pink...that's not the problem...the problem is that they do it all month and it loses its purpose (IMHO)



I think they're doing it all month so that there's many game worn pink items to be auctioned off, proceeds going to brast cancer research
I'm all for raising awareness to a disease that kills, moms, wives, and sisters, but I think they can achieve that more efficiently. Think of the size of the check the NFL could cut for breast cancer research if they simply took all that money they spent on pink cleats, gloves, towels, wristbands, shirts and caps and donated it to research. At the same time, painting a simple pink ribbon on the field at each stadium would keep the promotion front and center.
quote:
Originally posted by RochNyFan:
I'm all for raising awareness to a disease that kills, moms, wives, and sisters, but I think they can achieve that more efficiently. Think of the size of the check the NFL could cut for breast cancer research if they simply took all that money they spent on pink cleats, gloves, towels, wristbands, shirts and caps and donated it to research. At the same time, painting a simple pink ribbon on the field at each stadium would keep the promotion front and center.


The NFL could easily cut the check, but it is pretty rare for a huge organization/corporation to do so. By doing it like this, the NFL puts out a little money for the pink gear (maybe a $.99 towel? I think they can afford it) and then makes fans pony up by bidding. The returns on the auction are probably far greater than the NFL pays for the special gear (which they probably get a big discount on anyway), the NFL doesn't have to cut a check to charity, and the NFL looks good -- for less money.

Despite being a woman and seeing the affects of the disease in several friends and the loss of friends, I do think a whole month is too long. I think they should call it something like "cancer awareness month," split it in half with two weeks devoted to breast cancer and two to prostrate cancer. Easy -- pink gear for two, blue gear for two. Smiler
Fandame -

I respect what you are saying, but I don't think we are talking about just a little money, or .99 a towel. There are 45 guys who dress each game day, wearing pink cleats, pink gloves, pink wristbands, pink dew-rags, etc. Multiply that by 32 teams and that means you are outfitting nearly 1500 players....and we haven't even started talking about the hats and coaches' gear.
quote:
Originally posted by RochNyFan:
Fandame -

I respect what you are saying, but I don't think we are talking about just a little money, or .99 a towel. There are 45 guys who dress each game day, wearing pink cleats, pink gloves, pink wristbands, pink dew-rags, etc. Multiply that by 32 teams and that means you are outfitting nearly 1500 players....and we haven't even started talking about the hats and coaches' gear.


Hey, in the big scheme of things, it's a drop in the bucket for the NFL. And while I don't know for sure, it would be interesting to find out if the teams have to pony up for all/some of their players' gear. If I'm not mistaken, I think it's the teams that buy and supply gear for their individual players. So, do the teams have to pay for some of the pink gear or is it all NFL? Either way, it's such a huge promotional thing -- and a way to try to hook/keep more female fans -- that I think the NFL can easily afford it.
The NFL is reaching out to women, this is one way to do it and get credit for supporting a worthy cause. I read some place the Packers figure about 30% of their fan base are women. That make sense to me, I remember every Sunday the Packers played the whole extended family came together to watch the game. Lots of food, lots of grandmother, aunts, and girl cousins at those get together. While many of my female relationship may not have been as much into the games as my male family members they sure enjoyed having the family together.
quote:
Originally posted by RochNyFan:
Not saying the NFL can't afford it...rather, it would be better spent going directly to research instead of being wasted on pink gear. Promoting awareness can be done much more efficiently.


Pink gear adds exposure to how "concerned" the NFL is. It's all PR. A month of pink gear is worth a whole lot more than is a two-minute grip-and-grin with dudes/dames in suits holding a fake check. I agree it is a bit inefficient, but on the other hand, look how much discussion it's generated here! Big Grin
quote:
Also there is a baking soda treatment for cancer that has shown remarkable success but the doctor who discovered and administered it had his medical license revoked. Cancer is a very political dis-ease.

Then there is Vitamin B17. A carbon in the molecule contains four groups. Two are sugars, one is a cyanide, and one a benzaldehyde.

The cyanide and benzaldehyde are toxic, but not if the bond linking them to the carbon is not broken. Taken together, there is a synergy effect (read: much more toxic). Cancer cells contain an enzyme that breaks the bond. And so if folks merely had Vitamin B17 in their diet, no cancer. Analogous to no scurvy if people get Vitamin C. (No other cell in the body contains the enzyme.)

A family pracitioner (now deceased) who was once a skeptic, wrote a book on his treatment of patients. He cured patients who even had metastatic cancer. Book available on-line.

http://www.whale.to/m/binzel.html

Then you got Royal Rife...


They do not want a cure.

sigh
quote:
Originally posted by Iowacheese:
sigh
Typical knee-jerk response.

Keep taking the blue pills. They love you for it.


When I was in Dallas, as I didn't know anyone, I joined a tennis meetup (internet utility). Some dude email's me and asks me if I want to play.

Sure.

During a break, we somehow discussed this topic and he tells me, don't bother. I apologize to which he replies, "No, you don't understand. I know all about it."

He was like 55 years old. At 18, he was sent home to die (incurable cancer). Lifts up his shirt and shows me this huge scar running up from waist to almost neck.

Says he was at the cancer clinic in Tijuana (Contreras). Was healed. Says he saw Steve McQueen there and said he died cuz he didn't follow the protocol.

I guess the above guy is famous as I mentioned the story to friends who know of him. I don't remember his name.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×