Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

What are you not buying? It's a seam throw. The same throw Tom Brady & Rodgers practice & do regularly.

Rodgers mentioned early in his career he spoke with Tom about that specific play & improving his seam throwing.

I get Hundley is no Rodgers or Brady....however....you aren't going to have a WR any more WIDE OPEN than that in the NFL.

He's not good. He's a career backup. I hope he improves & I'm wrong but 3 years invested in a career backup just isn't very good coaching or personnel evaluation. 

Brainwashed Boris posted:

What are you not buying? It's a seam throw. The same throw Tom Brady & Rodgers practice & do regularly.

Rodgers mentioned early in his career he spoke with Tom about that specific play & improving his seam throwing.

I get Hundley is no Rodgers or Brady....however....you aren't going to have a WR any more WIDE OPEN than that in the NFL.

He's not good. He's a career backup. I hope he improves & I'm wrong but 3 years invested in a career backup just isn't very good coaching or personnel evaluation. 

I don't even think he's a career backup. A career backup is a guy who makes the "easy" throws within the scheme but doesn't necessarily have the talent to execute difficult plays. Matt Flynn makes that throw to Nelson, steps up in the pocket, or throws the wheel route to the back. Matt Flynn didn't have the arm strength to drop a ball in small windows on out routes or in the seam. That's why he wasn't a starter elsewhere. Hundley isn't making many of the easy reads and he isn't physically talented in the way that someone like Michael Vick was who can get away with just relying on athleticism. He's a poor man's Vince Young.

I would say let the Joe Callahan era begin, but I know MM has too much of the old P'burgh 'Cho stored up to willingly admit any sort of defeat. The Sons of the Monongahela ain't built that way.

Pulling Hundley is a lose-lose proposition. On hand, it admits he was rong about him. On the other, if Callahan fails, then he was rong about him too, and there is no plan C.

Brett Hundley Draft Thread

WEAKNESSES: Poor pocket awareness and presence, struggling to decipher and recognize pressures...drops his eyes early and allows defenders to disrupt his tempo, struggling to manage the pocket and stare down the gun barrel, especially with interior pressures...too easily rattled and doesn't play with consistent confidence in the pocket...needs to develop his internal clock, holding the ball too long and allowing the pocket to swallow him up.

What we're seeing from Hundley was the knock on him coming out of UCLA.

Hundley did exactly what NFL teams would hope a backup quarterback would do in his situation on Monday night.  86.0 quarterback rating, 0 interceptions, 0 fumbles.  Worst number was 3 sacks but on 2 of them he was moving forward so the three sacks only totaled a loss of 12 yards.  He missed some reads but still completed nearly 70% of his passes and was responsible for zero turnovers.  That's decent backup quarterback stuff there.  Manage the game and don't completely screw it up.  The reason the Packers could play .500 football with Matt Flynn a few years ago wasn't because Flynn was a great quarterback, but because he was a solid backup quarterback with a good surrounding cast.  That's not the case with Hundley.  His running backs aren't as good, the offensive line isn't as good, and the defense can't defend the pass at all (can't cover and can't create pressure, they are just awful).  Maybe the Packers could have out-gunned the Lions with the league's best talent at quarterback, but even with an average starting NFL quarterback the Packers had very little chance of winning this game.  If the Packers started putting up points then Caldwell would have likely just said "forget the running game" and would have let Stafford/Jones/Tate bomb this defense.  Stafford had a QB rating of 132.4 in this ballgame, and there is little doubt the Lions probably could have hung 40+ on the Packers if they would have wanted too.

Also hate the way McCarthy started the game with 4 Aaron Jones runs in the first 11 plays and 8 of those 11 snaps were taken with Hundley under center.  The team went down the field and botched the field goal, no fault of the offense.  But Jones' fourth carry was as 8:48 of the first quarter.  The next time a running back got a handoff (not counting the gadgets to Davis/Cobb) was a Montgomery carry with 2:04 left in the second quarter.  So with the backup quarterback in, McCarthy somehow made the decision to go 21+ minutes in the first half without a "traditional" running play.  Also, after the first drive Hundley was in the shotgun on 20 of the next 25 plays.  Great way to help out a backup quarterback, abandon the running game and completely telegraph to the defense that you want to pass, pass, pass.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×