Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I'm not sure if Lopez would have helped. The Pacers probably shot 2 dozen 3s with no one within 4 feet. Lopez wouldn't have helped that.

I guess I’m just struggling to understand how this could happen, MP. You get a 2.5 game lead in the conference with 14 games left, and you’re playing at home against a team with nothing to play for, missing one of its top players.

This should have been a gimmie, and for a half, the Bucks were out in front. The entire team just laid an egg in the second half. I mean 84 points. Really?

I guess I’m just struggling to understand how this could happen, MP. You get a 2.5 game lead in the conference with 14 games left, and you’re playing at home against a team with nothing to play for, missing one of its top players.

This should have been a gimmie, and for a half, the Bucks were out in front. The entire team just laid an egg in the second half. I mean 84 points. Really?

I watched the whole thing.

A lot of it was Giannis got in foul trouble and then basically quit playing any defense so he could stay in the game. The Bucks basically played with 4 defenders in the second half when Giannis was on the floor. TJ McConnell drove on him 3 times for layups in crunch time.

The other part was going under screens to allow wide-open 3s and letting corner 3s happen over and over.

Connaughton and Carter got their asses handed to them by Nwora and Hill.

It was a lot of things, but if Giannis shows up like he usually does, he drops 45 and actually plays defense and they win. He was terrible tonight, in large part because of the foul trouble.

It’s the NBA, so needless to say we shouldn’t be surprised.

For everyone piling on the Bucks for getting worked by a bad Indiana team, have you also followed Boston and Philadelphia?    They’ve both had some awful losses to bad teams.  It happens.

What concerns me is Pat C hasn’t looked the same since coming back from his last injury.  Middleton is still playing mediocre ball.  And 4Q defense at times this year has been a problem.  

The Bucks have had about 3 embarrassing performances this year where they have been run out of the gym. There were some other losses that were frustrating, but were due to 1-2 miscues or bad breaks at the end of a game (Giannis throwing away in inbounds pass against the Bulls, Holiday dribbling out of bounds against the Warriors, Harden hitting a 32 foot 3 pointer with less than a minute left against the Sixers).

But there were three games that they didn't show up even with Giannis playing.

1. Charlotte hung about 50 on them in the first quarter of that game in Milwaukee.

2. Another where Memphis lead them by 45 after the third quarter and put 47 up in the third.

3. Last night's 49 point Pacer quarter.

The common denominator is that all 3 losses were to teams that the Bucks were old and slow and wouldn't want to run with teams they know they could beat. Those 3 were shameful defensive performances. Those 3 just ran even after made baskets and beat the Bucks down the floor for layups or wide open corner 3s and just ran them off the floor.

I think whoever the Bucks play in Round 1 of the playoffs is going to try to do this against them. If the Bucks are a 1 or 2 seed, some of their possible matchups will be the Pacers, Bulls, Wizards, Hawks, and Raptors. I think the only chance those teams will have is to do that, so the Bucks better decide to make more of an effort against those types of tactics.

I think something to consider is in the playoffs the pace slows down and it becomes more of a half court game.  

Ironically, up until 2020 the Bucks were run and gun not unlike teams like Charlotte and Indiana.  It got them nowhere until they understood how to adapt to the more deliberate, physical style of play and obviously adding Holiday made a huge difference.

Last edited by Tschmack
@Tschmack posted:

I think something to consider is in the playoffs the pace slows down and it becomes more of a half court game.  

Ironically, up until 2020 the Bucks were run and gun not unlike teams like Charlotte and Indiana.  It got them nowhere until they understood how to adapt to the more deliberate, physical style of play and obviously adding Holiday made a huge difference.

I think a series against Boston, Philly, or Cleveland (and probably Miami or Toronto) will become a half court slogfest.

But, the Bucks may give one of these run and gun teams a punchers chance to steal a series if they don't get more serious about these types of games. Maybe a team can't do this to win 4 of 7, but you want to minimize the stress of that first round series before you get into a slugfest.

When the NBA went to a best of 7 format for round 1 it basically eliminated or greatly reduced the odds of the underdog stealing a series.  

As we’ve seen with the Bucks, it’s possible for one of those teams like Chicago to win a game or two just by shooting the lights out.   The problem is if you don’t stress defense and rebounding - or have the players to do it- you won’t have much of a chance against teams like Milwaukee or Boston that will bludgeon you to death.  Not to mention those two teams specifically have a lot of guys that can match the other team in terms of shooting and scoring.  

My earlier point was all of the contenders in the East have had a number of ugly losses this year.   Boston has more of them than Milwaukee.  

Yes it’s frustrating to watch but IMO this is where the league either has to extend out the regular season to avoid back to backs and load management, or they need to reduce games.   There is no reason they need to play 82 games when most teams really only play hard for about 60 of them.  

Last edited by Tschmack

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×