@D J posted:
Seems like a bit of a dumdum YouTuber... not that he's entirely wrong, in fact I'd say the Bills did get screwed on those calls.
Anyway, first off on the 4th down call... on the preceding 3rd down it looked like the guy might have just outright gotten the first. It's hard to tell on my YTTV as there's no frame-by-frame, the play/pause is unresponsive, and it's very hard to tell when/if his elbow hits. The initial spot from the ref looks reasonably fair, literally an inch or two short. Then for no reason in particular it seems like the actual spot of the ball ends up being pushed back some inches. Then the center of course moves it up to about where it was initially spotted anyways. Not clear but I think he maybe made it. Bills go fast for the fourth down so there's no replay and the play is quickly forgotten. 1st and 2nd down spots looked good to me.
On fourth down in the reverse angle replay, he may have gotten it on his first effort, but pretty clearly got it on the second effort. That's also the angle the official who spotted what looked like a first down initially had... but he weirdly shifted backwards as he navigated the players as he ran in. And then yeah I guess officials often average out their spots... but this wasn't that kind of spot. Allen's body was completely obscuring the ball to one side. The guy at the top of the screen should have indicated first down right away. He saw it. And the marker is right on the 40. There's no ambiguity, it's an easy call.
As far as the Worthy "catch", I guess I should explain my dumdum comment... the guy completely ignores that there was a declined defensive call on the play that would have resulted in a first down. So, he sounds dumb acting like it prevented a fourth down and extended the possession.
And then he messes up the verbiage when talking about the catch. Granted lots and lots of people do that but it's annoying (Romo does it here too). People keep saying "possession" when they should say "control". Control of the ball, along with getting your feet down for example, is an element of establishing possession. No idea why that's so complicated. The refs always talk about "control" e.g. "did not maintain control." If you didn't maintain "possession" well that's a fumble innit? Pretty distinct concepts.
Anywho, Worthy slams the ball into the ground with one hand kind of guiding it down while pinned to the BUF guy's arm... it definitely moves a bit and most importantly the ground pretty obviously is what lets him get "control", which is the exact thing the ground can't do even under the tyranny of the Bert Emanuel rule. Great work Bert, because you couldn't do the simple job of keeping the ball from hitting the ground we get to deal with this extra bit of BS judgment call idiocy apparently till at least the end of our natural lives.
But fighting a player for control as the ball hits the ground is clearly not control. What are we even talking about here?