Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Tdog:

heck, if the doc's are good with it and he wants to sign off on a bunch of waivers to protect the GBP from any possible resulting damages who are we to deny a man gainful employment. 

 

Terrance Murphy offered precisely that within his contract to the Packers. They still said no. Murphys agent then went onto every other team in the league and offered the same deal. They all said no.

 

I think for the NFL, the thought of Collins going down again in a heap after getting hit laying motionless on the field knowing his medical history is about all the PR nightmare they need to conjure up to realize: BAD IDEA.

 

Even if Collins held GB or X team harmless to a lawsuit, if the above happened you would have talking heads going off left and right that the NFL doesn't care about players, that Collins should have never been allowed back, etc etc.

 

I just can't see any team taking that risk.

PR concerns aside, there's no player, no matter how much he wanted back on the field, that would accept a deal that said the Packers don't have to pay at all if the player ends up on IR. That's the only way a team would sign Collins and that's why no team would sign Terrance Murphy. The injury risk is so high and they don't want to pay someone who will likely end up on IR for nothing. Even if it's vet minimum (which for Collins would be pretty high) that's a very risky gamble with precious cap space. From my understanding the injury wavers only protect the team from being sued by the player if he's re-injured, not from the balance of his contract if he ends up on IR. The team can tout all they want about how they're only thinking about what's best for Nick, but that's what it comes down to and I don't blame them. 

Money always plays a role, but given the immense lip service the league is paying to player safety, I think pboi's comments on the potential PR nightmare were a big part of the decision

No doubt the lawyers weighed in on liability too, irregardless of the contract language

 

In a league where they hire guys to stand on the sidelines to make sure your socks are at the correct height... the NFL Image and Shield will always be protected over any one player. The need$$ of the many outweigh the needs of the few, especially with concussion & injury settlements still being disputed in the courts

 

Originally Posted by Satori:

...No doubt the lawyers weighed in on liability too, irregardless of the contract language...

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

This. Just because he signs off any liability to the Packers, that doesn't guarantee GB of any wrongdoing if they are sued by Collins in the future.

Last edited by missingU92

Sometimes players need to be protected from themselves. It's not like this is a bad knee or even an eye we are talking about...this is is neck...this is an instant away from lifetime paralysis or death. You can make the argument that this can happen on any given play, but the odds are exponentially greater for someone like Collins.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×