Jesus, that was the easiest call ever. The ball was spinning around like Linda Blair's head in The Exorcist.
MM has to go. Seriously.
Lotta time boys, lotta time. We got the GOAT
Missed FG looming huge right now.
Not challenging a winnable challenge is a fire-able offense.
What a joke
You. Are. Kidding. Me. Again.
Well we are losing now so itâs 100% pass time.
Blair Kiel posted:Not challenging a winnable challenge is a fire-able offense.
Timeouts? Who needs em?
Herschel posted:Missed FG looming huge right now.
The whole offense being a cluster is looming huge right now.
PackerHawk posted:Well we are losing now so itâs 100% pass time.
As compared to
Think blowing timeouts early really hurt them on that drive.
If they end up losing, this is a coaching loss. Failed to challenge because you blew timeouts for no good reason.
5 1st and 10s at midfield or better and only a FG to show for it.
Our backups to the backups got beat. One time out left. But we have plenty of time. I wish we had some receivers to help Aaron.
Blair Kiel posted:Not challenging a winnable challenge is a fire-able offense.
They never showed it.
Can MM put together a balanced, creative drive? Can AR execute? Is that too much to ask of pros?
PackerHawk posted:Well we are losing now so itâs 100% pass time.
When did we last run the ball?
Grave Digger posted:ChilliJon posted:**** YOU MIKE MCCARTHY!!!!!!!
What are you talking about?!? Rodgers has Jones WIDE open and didnât even look at him. Jones would have walked in the end zone.
Play was never for Jones. Rodgers never looked that direction. Not once.
THATS THE ****ING PROBLEM. THE PLAY SHOULD HAVE ALWAYS BEEN TO JONES. ONLY TO JONES. ITS ALL ****ING BROKEN!!!!!!!!!!!
Pikes Peak posted:PackerHawk posted:Well we are losing now so itâs 100% pass time.
As compared to
Pass 99.5% of the time.
Blair Kiel posted:Not challenging a winnable challenge is a fire-able offense.
Ueah, but they never showed a clear replay until after Seattle ran a play. Then the replay where you could actually see the ball and could safely throw the flag. Itâs effing Seattle...
Blair Kiel posted:Not challenging a winnable challenge is a fire-able offense.
Could be, but my hunch is they wouldn't have overturned it. As much as Seattle does make big plays, they get big calls as well in this building.
Chongo posted:Blair Kiel posted:Not challenging a winnable challenge is a fire-able offense.
Timeouts? Who needs em?
That play called back was worth the time out risk.
Davis at least took the knee.
michiganjoe posted:Think blowing timeouts early really hurt them on that drive.
Yah but in Seattle we would not have got that overturned anyway.
Need to use time remaining and get the TD. We won't be able to stop them in crunch time. And I do NOT want an OT game in Seattle.
Pikes Peak posted:PackerHawk posted:Well we are losing now so itâs 100% pass time.
As compared to
90% pass.
Fukk this.
Four down territory.
MichiganPacker2 posted:5 1st and 10s at midfield or better and only a FG to show for it.
Totally on the offense here. The only time thereâs any rhythm is the 2 minute drill.
Now, no more long developing pass plays. Quick strikes and RTFB!
Ok thereâs one pass off the back foot. With Jones open.
WTF was that
This is the time for a good coach to put together a drive with underneath passes while Seahawks are protecting against being burned again but I doubt MM understand that, we will see at least one we screen probably first play
Here comes a 3 and out.
3rd and 2. So, we'll be looking to throw it 50 yards.
aR scramble for 1st
RTFB!
The worst part is the plays after the two timeouts were both worthless.
Timeout at 4:31 in 3rd quarter. A.Rodgers sacked at SEA 49 for -6 yards (sack split by A.Calitro and J.Reed)
Timeout at 10:31 in 4th quarter. 1st & 10 at SEA 17. A.Rodgers pass short left to A.Jones to SEA 16 for 1 yard
Lol.
This has to be a 5 min drive if we want to win. Thanks to injury and MM refusal to run the ball this half our d has nothing left.
Hungry5 posted:Here comes a 3 and out.
I hate you.