Skip to main content

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I can see game playing out very similar to last week vs the Jets.
Yet another team we should be able to mop the floor with, but allowing them to look like a well-oiled machine at times. The lead will change a few times, any TOs would be huge factors, and we may pull out a win in the end by a last-minute TD or last-second FG.

Pettine has another week to put something on the field resembling a defense. Injuries have hit that side of the team hard, but I think he has responded well with adjustments and planning. It's less than ideal, to say the least, but some guys have really stepped up (Lowry, Lancaster, Breeland, and others) and they are playing hard. Clark's loss hurts, but Alexander's loss is a killer.

Yes, it would be nice for a higher draft position but if these last two games are a springboard for ironing out the bullshit from the last two seasons and everyone getting on the same page for next year, I'm good with a victory or at least a competitive game.  Defense always comes to play even if they are 5th stringers.  Pettine sucks. 

I believe it was Ben Fennell who posted that the Packers D is getting killed on first and second down, mostly on play action, and that comes down to the packages that Pettine is playing.  At the same time, the talent on the field on the D side of the ball being fielded right now is terrible.  There are no quick twitch DL or LBs, outside of Fackrell.  It is early, but the contributions from the rookie class outside of Alexander have been underwhelming (Jackson, Burks, Looney).  I'm hoping to see more from M. Adams this week, to see if he's actually starting to get it.  There are some positive signs.  

I actually really like what Adams has been doing the last couple weeks. He's been a mixed bag overall, but his good plays have looked really good. I think he has Kenny Clark potential. 

We talk a lot about which coaches suck, but Jerry Montgomery is freaking killing it with player development. Clark is an all-pro, Lowry and Lancaster are looking legit quality depth, and Adams is showing signs of life. With Daniels coming back and if they re-sign Mo Wilkerson, we will have the best and deepest DL group in the NFL. 

GrainBelt66 posted:

Even if it is Philbin that engineers it?

which would probably make him a top HC candidate after going 3-1 as Interim coach...

 

He would've beaten the Falcons, Jets and Lions and lost to the only good team (Bears). Other than the game against the Cards, that's exactly what MM did this season.

Grave Digger posted:

Clark is an all-pro, Lowry and Lancaster are looking legit quality depth, and Adams is showing signs of life. With Daniels coming back and if they re-sign Mo Wilkerson, we will have the best and deepest DL group in the NFL. 

that's voldermort there.  you can see it and realize it but you can't type it out or say it out loud or the Injurious Plaguemonsterous begins to stalk.

heyward posted:
GrainBelt66 posted:

Even if it is Philbin that engineers it?

which would probably make him a top HC candidate after going 3-1 as Interim coach...

 

He would've beaten the Falcons, Jets and Lions and lost to the only good team (Bears). Other than the game against the Cards, that's exactly what MM did this season.

Actually, no.

This means that they actually beat the teams they should. Other than the cards.

Something Mac's coaching was incapable of doing.

Last edited by GrainBelt66
GrainBelt66 posted:

Even if it is Philbin that engineers it?

which would probably make him a top HC candidate after going 3-1 as Interim coach...

 

Not if they're serious about taking the team in a different direction.  Unfortunately, that possibility can't be overlooked. 

michiganjoe posted:

I can't see how Spriggs lasts. Yes, I get he's a 2nd round pick and still under contract, but I have to think Gutenmeister has seen more then enough.

Pikes Peak posted:

His team beat the Niners and the Bills.  Crushed the Bills.

Needed a damn miracle to beat the Niners.

Lost to the Lions, Redskins and Cardinals. All teams they should have been able to beat. 

packerboi posted:

I can't see how Spriggs lasts. Yes, I get he's a 2nd round pick and still under contract, but I have to think Gutenmeister has seen more then enough.

Vince Biegel demonstrated that Gutey is more than willing to quickly pull the plug on a player when he views them as little more than a waste of roster space. Unfortunately, I think Spriggs may be a bit like Hawk in that the organization has a higher view of him than most fans.

My take is that Spriggs had to be kept this year because of depth concerns.
Put in the simplest terms, there was nobody else left to play T.
I think the team also hoped this would be the year he would break out, but if it's not clear by now that he's not going to.....

I'd like to see what a year in the system did to Kizer (not joking).  Clearly not ideal, throwing to (guys not named Adams), but did a year of "not being a Brown" have any effect on him?  

Strange announcers on TV. I wonder if they will actually report the game or bog us down with stupid stories which they know nothing about.

somebody needs to start a game thread.

Last edited by PackerPatrick
PackerPatrick posted:

Strange announcers on TV. I wonder if they will actually report the game or bog us down with stupid stories which they know nothing about.

somebody needs to start a game thread.

Did they just say that Williams was the third string RB?

bdplant posted:
PackerPatrick posted:

Strange announcers on TV. I wonder if they will actually report the game or bog us down with stupid stories which they know nothing about.

somebody needs to start a game thread.

Did they just say that Williams was the third string RB?

Jones and Montgomery started the year ahead of him

bdplant posted:
PackerPatrick posted:

Strange announcers on TV. I wonder if they will actually report the game or bog us down with stupid stories which they know nothing about.

somebody needs to start a game thread.

Did they just say that Williams was the third string RB?

Yes behind Jones and Rodgers.  

PackerHawk posted:
bdplant posted:
PackerPatrick posted:

Strange announcers on TV. I wonder if they will actually report the game or bog us down with stupid stories which they know nothing about.

somebody needs to start a game thread.

Did they just say that Williams was the third string RB?

Yes behind Jones and Rodgers.  

And at one time Ty

MichiganPacker2 posted:
bdplant posted:
PackerPatrick posted:

Strange announcers on TV. I wonder if they will actually report the game or bog us down with stupid stories which they know nothing about.

somebody needs to start a game thread.

Did they just say that Williams was the third string RB?

Jones and Montgomery started the year ahead of him

Jones missed the first two games and was 3rd string RB for a good number of games after that. Was 3rd in the rotation. 

Rodgers, Tramon, Crosby, M. Lewis, Graham, CM3, Kendricks, and Eddie Pleasant are all active and all 30 or over. The guys that are inactive or on IR are all under 30. 

Guess this means we should sign more old guys?

 

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×